Environmental Protection Agency awards $3.5M contract for remediation services to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,500,614 ($3.5M)

Contractor: Environmental Restoration LLC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2023-05-30

End Date: 2026-01-31

Contract Duration: 977 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: HOCKESSIN GW OU2

Place of Performance

Location: FENTON, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63026

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $3.5 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC for work described as: HOCKESSIN GW OU2 Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 3. The period of performance spans over two years, indicating a significant, ongoing need for these services. 4. The contractor, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC, has secured this award, suggesting a competitive capability in remediation. 5. The contract is for remediation services, a critical environmental function. 6. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.5 million over approximately two years for remediation services appears moderate. Without specific benchmarks for the scope of work (e.g., volume of material remediated, complexity of contamination), a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds compared to industry standards for similar environmental cleanup projects. The award amount of $3,583,000 is noted, but the actual spend will depend on hours and materials utilized.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' While this indicates an initial broad solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests specific criteria or prior relationships might have narrowed the field before the final award. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature implies multiple entities had the opportunity to compete, which generally supports price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process, even with exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through multiple offers. This approach helps prevent inflated pricing that might occur in less competitive scenarios.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its mission to protect human health and the environment. Services delivered include environmental remediation, likely involving the cleanup of contaminated sites. The geographic impact is specified as Missouri (MO), indicating the services are needed within that state. The contract supports the environmental services sector workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs for specialists in remediation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not diligently managed and monitored.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type requires further scrutiny to understand its impact on the breadth of competition.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the remediation efforts.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a full and open competition process, indicating an effort to solicit multiple bids.
The contract addresses a critical environmental need for the EPA.
The contractor, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC, has been selected, implying they met the necessary qualifications.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation services sector is a significant part of the broader environmental services industry, driven by regulatory compliance and the need to address historical contamination. This contract fits within the EPA's ongoing efforts to manage and clean up hazardous sites. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without detailed project scope, but federal spending in environmental services is substantial, supporting numerous contractors.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. The contractor, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides appears minimal, and subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on the prime contractor's strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Environmental Protection Agency's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Time and Materials contract, including monitoring of labor hours and material costs. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but detailed performance reports and cost breakdowns may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program (CERCLA)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) cleanups
Brownfields Program
Defense Environmental Remediation Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Ambiguity in 'exclusion of sources' clause requires further investigation into competition breadth.
Lack of publicly available performance metrics hinders effectiveness assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $3.5 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC. HOCKESSIN GW OU2

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-30. End: 2026-01-31.

What is the specific nature of the remediation services required under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Remediation Services' (NAICS code 562910) awarded to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). While the exact scope is not detailed, remediation services typically involve the cleanup of contaminated soil, water, or groundwater. This can include activities such as excavation, treatment, containment, monitoring, and disposal of hazardous substances. Given the EPA's involvement, the services likely pertain to sites regulated under federal environmental laws like CERCLA (Superfund) or RCRA, addressing environmental hazards to protect public health and ecosystems.

How does the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar environmental remediation projects?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not clearly defined or is expected to fluctuate, which can be common in remediation projects where unforeseen conditions may arise. However, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns compared to fixed-price contracts because the government pays for the actual labor hours and material costs incurred by the contractor, plus a fixed fee or fixed hourly rates. For well-defined remediation scopes, fixed-price contracts are generally preferred for better cost certainty. Effective oversight, including detailed tracking of hours, rates, and materials, is crucial to manage costs under a T&M agreement and ensure value for money.

What does 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' imply for the bidding process and potential cost savings?

The term 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests that while the initial solicitation was intended to be broadly competitive, certain sources were excluded based on specific criteria before the final award decision. This could be due to pre-qualification requirements, specific technical capabilities, or other factors defined in the solicitation. While 'full and open' competition generally promotes price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers, the 'exclusion of sources' element means the competition might have been narrower than a purely open solicitation. The extent of cost savings would depend on how many qualified bidders remained after the exclusions and the competitiveness of their proposals.

What is the track record of ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the EPA?

The provided data identifies ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC as the contractor for this specific award. To assess their track record, one would need to examine historical federal contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any past performance issues or successes. Without access to this broader contract history, it's difficult to definitively state their track record. However, securing a contract with the EPA, especially through a competitive process, suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and capabilities to perform environmental remediation services.

Are there any specific performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with this contract to measure success?

The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, such metrics would be detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). For environmental remediation, KPIs might include the percentage of contaminants removed, adherence to cleanup standards within specified timeframes, compliance with environmental regulations during the cleanup process, safety incident rates, and budget adherence. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it challenging to quantitatively assess the contractor's performance and the overall effectiveness of the remediation efforts.

How does the $3.5 million contract value compare to historical EPA spending on similar remediation services in Missouri?

Comparing this $3.5 million contract value to historical EPA spending on similar remediation services in Missouri requires access to detailed historical procurement data. Factors such as the specific type and scale of contamination, the complexity of the cleanup required, and the number of sites being addressed in a given period would influence spending levels. This contract appears to be a single delivery order, potentially part of a larger IDIQ or framework agreement. Without knowing the total value of the parent contract or the specific scope of work this delivery order covers, it's difficult to benchmark it against broader historical spending patterns for Missouri alone. However, $3.5 million represents a significant investment for a specific remediation effort.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1666 FABICK DR, FENTON, MO, 63026

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,500,614

Exercised Options: $3,500,614

Current Obligation: $3,500,614

Actual Outlays: $3,500,614

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0322D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline