EPA awards $49.4M for emergency response services, with Environmental Restoration LLC securing a significant delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $49,445,086 ($49.4M)

Contractor: Environmental Restoration LLC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-09-05

End Date: 2026-08-29

Contract Duration: 358 days

Daily Burn Rate: $138.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: REGION 6, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES V (ERRS V) - FOR THE SMITTY'S SUPPLY FIRE P00001 IS TO ADD FUNDING TO ALLOW RAPID MOBILIZATION OF EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES (ERRS)

Place of Performance

Location: DALLAS, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75270

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $49.4 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC for work described as: REGION 6, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES V (ERRS V) - FOR THE SMITTY'S SUPPLY FIRE P00001 IS TO ADD FUNDING TO ALLOW RAPID MOBILIZATION OF EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES (ERRS) Key points: 1. The contract focuses on rapid mobilization for emergency and environmental response, indicating a need for agile and immediate support. 2. Environmental Restoration LLC, the contractor, has been awarded a substantial delivery order under the ERRS V program. 3. The contract type, Time and Materials, suggests that costs will be based on labor hours and material expenses incurred. 4. The duration of the contract is approximately one year, aligning with the need for responsive, on-demand services. 5. The award is part of a larger indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, ERRS V, suggesting a framework for ongoing needs. 6. The geographic focus appears to be Region 6, which includes Texas, highlighting a specific area of operational concern.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $49.4 million for this delivery order appears to be within a reasonable range for emergency and rapid response services, especially considering the potential for unforeseen events and the need for immediate mobilization. Benchmarking against similar contracts within the ERRS V program or other federal emergency response vehicles would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and reflect actual effort and materials used.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies that while the initial contract vehicle (ERRS V) may have undergone full and open competition, this specific delivery order might have had certain sources excluded based on pre-defined criteria or capabilities. The number of bidders for this specific delivery order is not detailed, but the 'exclusion of sources' suggests a potentially narrowed field compared to a truly full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition for this delivery order could potentially lead to less aggressive pricing compared to a scenario with a broader range of bidders vying for the work. Taxpayers benefit from specialized capabilities being readily available, but the cost-effectiveness hinges on the justification for source exclusion.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are communities and the environment within EPA Region 6, particularly Texas, requiring rapid response to environmental incidents. The services delivered include emergency and rapid response, crucial for mitigating environmental damage and public health risks. The geographic impact is concentrated in EPA Region 6, with specific mention of Texas, indicating a focus on this area's environmental needs. Workforce implications include the need for skilled personnel capable of immediate deployment for environmental remediation and emergency services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants scrutiny to ensure it was justified and did not unduly limit competition.
Time and Materials contracts can be susceptible to cost overruns if not closely monitored for labor hours and material usage.
The specific nature of 'emergency and rapid response' can lead to unpredictable cost escalation due to the urgency and potential for unforeseen circumstances.

Positive Signals

The award is part of the ERRS V program, suggesting a pre-vetted and established framework for procuring these critical services.
The contract's focus on rapid mobilization indicates a proactive approach to environmental protection and incident management.
Environmental Restoration LLC's role in this delivery order signifies their recognized capability to provide essential emergency response services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a critical component of the broader environmental services industry. This sector is characterized by specialized firms capable of responding to a wide range of environmental hazards, from spills to hazardous waste cleanup. The market size for environmental remediation is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements, industrial activity, and the need for disaster recovery. This specific contract, as part of the ERRS V IDIQ, represents a significant portion of federal spending dedicated to ensuring rapid and effective environmental incident response across various EPA regions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific delivery order. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing specialized capabilities for emergency response, potentially favoring larger or more established firms with the necessary resources and certifications. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist within the execution of this contract, but they are not explicitly detailed in the provided information. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal for this particular award, as it does not appear to be a targeted small business initiative.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), given their role as the awarding agency. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards, delivery schedules, and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational reports may be less public. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Emergency Response Contracts
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts
EPA Region 6 Contracts
Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Justification for 'exclusion of sources' needs verification to ensure fair competition.
Effectiveness of rapid mobilization and response time needs continuous monitoring.
Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations during response operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $49.4 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC. REGION 6, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES V (ERRS V) - FOR THE SMITTY'S SUPPLY FIRE P00001 IS TO ADD FUNDING TO ALLOW RAPID MOBILIZATION OF EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES (ERRS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $49.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-05. End: 2026-08-29.

What is the historical spending pattern for Environmental Restoration LLC with the EPA, particularly under the ERRS V program?

Analyzing the historical spending for Environmental Restoration LLC with the EPA, specifically under the ERRS V program, is crucial for understanding their track record and the agency's reliance on their services. While this specific delivery order is for $49.4 million, a deeper dive into past awards, contract modifications, and performance reviews would reveal trends in their service delivery, cost management, and overall effectiveness. For instance, examining previous ERRS V awards to this contractor would indicate if this is a typical contract size or if there's an escalating trend. Furthermore, comparing their historical performance on similar emergency response contracts, both with the EPA and other federal agencies, can provide context on their reliability and value proposition. This historical data is essential for assessing whether the current award aligns with past performance and for identifying any potential risks associated with their established relationship with the agency.

How does the pricing structure (Time and Materials) for this delivery order compare to other similar emergency response contracts awarded by the EPA?

The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure for this $49.4 million delivery order requires careful comparison with similar emergency response contracts awarded by the EPA. T&M contracts offer flexibility, which is often necessary for the unpredictable nature of emergency response, but they can also lead to higher costs if not managed stringently. Benchmarking this contract against others that utilized T&M for comparable services (e.g., spill response, hazardous material cleanup) would reveal if the labor rates and material markups are competitive. It's also important to consider if other contracts for similar services employed fixed-price or cost-plus-incentive-fee structures, and why T&M was chosen here. A thorough analysis would involve examining the estimated hours, labor categories, and material costs associated with this award and comparing them to the average or median costs of similar contracts. This comparison helps determine if the EPA is achieving good value for money and if the chosen pricing model is appropriate for the scope of work.

What are the specific risks associated with the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type for this contract?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type for this $49.4 million delivery order presents specific risks that warrant careful consideration. While the initial contract vehicle (ERRS V) may have undergone full and open competition, the exclusion of certain sources for this particular delivery order implies a narrowed competitive landscape. The primary risk is that this exclusion might have limited the pool of potential offerors, potentially leading to higher prices than if a broader competition had been conducted. It's essential to understand the justification for excluding sources; if the exclusion was based on overly restrictive or subjective criteria, it could raise concerns about fairness and optimal price discovery. Furthermore, this award type could potentially limit the government's access to innovative solutions or specialized capabilities that might have been offered by the excluded firms. Ensuring that the exclusion criteria were clearly defined, justified, and consistently applied is paramount to mitigating these risks and assuring taxpayers that the best value was obtained.

What performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) are likely being used to evaluate Environmental Restoration LLC's effectiveness in delivering emergency and rapid response services?

Evaluating the effectiveness of Environmental Restoration LLC in delivering emergency and rapid response services under this $49.4 million contract hinges on specific performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Given the nature of the work, likely KPIs would include response time (e.g., time to mobilize personnel and equipment to a site), containment and cleanup effectiveness (measured by environmental sampling results and reduction of contaminants), adherence to safety protocols (e.g., incident-free workdays), compliance with regulatory standards, and overall cost control within the T&M framework. The EPA would likely track the successful completion of defined tasks, the efficiency of resource utilization, and the minimization of environmental impact. Regular performance reports from the contractor, coupled with government oversight and site inspections, would be used to monitor these KPIs. Failure to meet these metrics could result in contract remedies, including financial penalties or termination, underscoring the importance of robust performance management.

How does the $49.4 million award for ERRS V services fit into the EPA's overall budget and spending trends for environmental remediation and emergency response?

The $49.4 million award for Emergency and Rapid Response Services (ERRS V) to Environmental Restoration LLC represents a significant, albeit specific, allocation within the EPA's broader budget for environmental remediation and emergency response. To understand its context, one must examine the EPA's historical spending on similar IDIQ vehicles and individual delivery orders. The ERRS V program itself is designed to provide a flexible and readily available contracting mechanism for urgent environmental needs across multiple regions. This particular award's size should be compared to previous ERRS V awards and other EPA contracts for emergency response to gauge if it aligns with typical spending patterns or represents an increase in demand or scope. Factors influencing this award's size could include the number and severity of environmental incidents anticipated in EPA Region 6, the complexity of potential response actions, and the overall funding allocated to the EPA's emergency response programs. Analyzing this award in conjunction with the agency's total environmental cleanup and response budget provides insight into resource prioritization and the agency's capacity to address environmental emergencies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1666 FABICK DR, FENTON, MO, 63026

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,445,086

Exercised Options: $49,445,086

Current Obligation: $49,445,086

Actual Outlays: $33,567,692

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0422D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline