EPA awards $12.5M for Crossley Farm Superfund Site remediation, focusing on environmental services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,517,949 ($12.5M)

Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2022-09-27

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,191 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CROSSLEY FARM SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES)

Place of Performance

Location: BARTO, MONTGOMERY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19504

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $12.5 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: CROSSLEY FARM SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES) Key points: 1. Contract value of $12.5M for environmental remediation services. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration extends to December 2025, indicating a multi-year effort. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers some risk to the contractor. 5. Services are categorized under Remediation Services (NAICS 562910). 6. The award was made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 7. The work is located in Pennsylvania (SN: PENNSYLVANIA).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.5 million for environmental remediation services appears reasonable given the scope of a Superfund site cleanup. Without specific benchmarks for the Crossley Farm site's contamination levels and remediation complexity, direct comparison is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has priced the work to account for potential risks, which can be a sign of a well-defined scope and competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically leads to a more robust selection process and potentially better pricing due to market forces. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the open competition suggests a healthy level of interest from qualified firms in the environmental remediation sector.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring the most effective and cost-efficient cleanup of the Superfund site.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the local community and environment surrounding the Crossley Farm Superfund Site, through the cleanup of hazardous substances. Services delivered include the remediation of contaminated soil, groundwater, or other environmental media. The geographic impact is localized to the specific Superfund site in Pennsylvania. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for environmental scientists, engineers, technicians, and laborers involved in the remediation process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen contamination is discovered, despite the fixed-price contract.
Ensuring contractor compliance with stringent environmental regulations throughout the remediation process.
Long-term effectiveness of the chosen remediation technologies for the specific contaminants at the site.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Full and open competition likely resulted in selection of a highly qualified and competitive bidder.
EPA oversight is expected to ensure proper execution of the remediation plan.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation sector is a critical component of the broader environmental services industry, focused on cleaning up contaminated sites. Superfund sites, managed under the EPA's program, represent some of the most complex and costly cleanup projects. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address legacy pollution. This contract fits within the EPA's ongoing efforts to manage and remediate hazardous waste sites across the nation.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor is EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC, there is potential for subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within specialized areas of environmental remediation, depending on the prime contractor's strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms would include regular progress reports, site inspections, and performance reviews to ensure the contractor meets contractual obligations and environmental standards. Accountability is maintained through contractual terms and the potential for penalties or corrective actions if performance is deficient. Transparency is generally provided through public dockets and EPA reporting on Superfund site activities.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
Hazardous Waste Remediation
Environmental Consulting Services
Site Cleanup Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Ensuring long-term effectiveness of remediation technologies.
Contractor performance and adherence to strict environmental regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $12.5 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. CROSSLEY FARM SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-27. End: 2025-12-31.

What is the historical spending by the EPA on environmental remediation services, and how does this contract compare?

The EPA's Superfund program historically spends billions of dollars annually on site remediation. Specific figures fluctuate based on the number and complexity of sites undergoing cleanup. For instance, in recent fiscal years, the EPA has allocated significant portions of its budget towards Superfund activities, including site investigations, removal actions, and remedial design and construction. This $12.5 million contract for the Crossley Farm site represents a substantial but not extraordinary investment for a single Superfund site remediation, especially considering the long-term nature of such projects. The agency's overall spending reflects its commitment to addressing hazardous waste sites nationwide, with individual contracts like this being crucial components of that larger effort.

What specific remediation technologies are likely to be employed at the Crossley Farm Superfund Site?

The specific remediation technologies employed at the Crossley Farm Superfund Site would depend on the nature and extent of contamination, which includes soil and potentially groundwater. Common technologies for Superfund sites include excavation and off-site disposal, in-situ or ex-situ soil treatment (such as thermal desorption, stabilization, or bioremediation), and groundwater treatment systems (like pump-and-treat, air stripping, or activated carbon filtration). The selection of technologies is typically detailed in the Record of Decision (ROD) for the site, following extensive site investigation and feasibility studies. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC, as the contractor, will be responsible for implementing the chosen methods as outlined by the EPA.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type influence risk allocation and potential cost outcomes for this Superfund remediation?

A Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, like the one awarded for the Crossley Farm Superfund Site, shifts the primary risk of cost overruns to the contractor, EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC. The contractor agrees to perform the work for a predetermined price, regardless of their actual costs. This incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently and complete the project within budget. However, if unforeseen conditions arise that significantly increase costs beyond what was reasonably anticipated during bidding (e.g., discovery of more extensive contamination than initially assessed), the contractor bears that burden. Conversely, if the contractor can complete the work under budget, they retain the savings. For the EPA and taxpayers, FFP offers budget certainty, but it requires a well-defined scope of work during the bidding phase to ensure the price is fair and reflects the anticipated risks.

What is EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC's track record with EPA Superfund projects?

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC has a significant history of working with the EPA and other government agencies on environmental projects, including remediation services. Their portfolio often includes complex site cleanups, hazardous waste management, and environmental consulting. While specific performance details for every contract are not publicly detailed in this summary, their sustained presence and ability to win competitive bids for large-scale projects like this Superfund site remediation suggest a strong track record. Companies in this field are typically evaluated on their technical expertise, project management capabilities, safety record, and compliance history. EA's continued engagement in the federal contracting space, particularly with the EPA, indicates a level of competence and reliability in executing environmental remediation tasks.

What are the potential long-term environmental and community impacts of the Crossley Farm Superfund Site remediation?

The long-term impacts of the Crossley Farm Superfund Site remediation are expected to be overwhelmingly positive. Environmentally, the primary goal is to eliminate or significantly reduce the threat posed by hazardous substances to soil, groundwater, and local ecosystems, thereby restoring ecological balance. This can involve preventing further migration of contaminants and protecting natural resources. For the community, successful remediation leads to improved public health and safety by removing potential exposure pathways. It can also facilitate the redevelopment or beneficial reuse of the remediated land, potentially boosting local economic activity and property values. The EPA's Superfund program aims not just for cleanup but for the long-term protection of human health and the environment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HE0322R0012

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 SCHILLING CIR STE 400, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,517,949

Exercised Options: $12,517,949

Current Obligation: $12,517,949

Actual Outlays: $12,456,440

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 8

Total Subaward Amount: $17,020,046

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH19D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline