EPA Awards $47.15M Remediation Contract for Louisiana Superfund Site

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,150,577 ($47.2M)

Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2022-08-17

End Date: 2028-09-16

Contract Duration: 2,222 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REMEDIAL ACTION FRAMEWORK (RAF / REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES) TASK ORDER - U.S. EPA REGION 6 AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS INC. SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN WINNFIELD, LOUISIANA

Place of Performance

Location: WINNFIELD, WINN County, LOUISIANA, 71483

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $47.2 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: REMEDIAL ACTION FRAMEWORK (RAF / REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES) TASK ORDER - U.S. EPA REGION 6 AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS INC. SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN WINNFIELD, LOUISIANA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC for environmental remediation. 2. The contract is for the American Creosote Works Inc. Superfund Site in Winnfield, Louisiana. 3. This is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, indicating potential for cost overruns. 4. The sector is Environmental Services, a critical area for public health and safety.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking CPFF contracts in environmental remediation is challenging due to project variability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the CPFF structure means the final price is not fixed upfront, impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental cleanup, which is a necessary but potentially costly public service.

Public Impact

Addresses a Superfund site, indicating a need to mitigate environmental hazards. Remediation efforts aim to protect public health and the environment in Louisiana. Long-term contract duration suggests ongoing environmental challenges at the site. The use of CPFF could lead to costs exceeding initial estimates if not closely monitored.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
Long contract duration (over 4 years)

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized
Addresses critical environmental remediation need

Sector Analysis

Environmental remediation services are crucial for addressing hazardous waste sites and protecting public health. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on site complexity and remediation technology. This contract falls within the broader environmental consulting and remediation industry.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside. Therefore, it is unlikely that small businesses were specifically targeted for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. The CPFF structure necessitates robust oversight to ensure cost efficiency and prevent unnecessary expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to higher costs.
Long contract duration increases exposure to potential cost escalations.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Requires robust EPA oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $47.2 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. REMEDIAL ACTION FRAMEWORK (RAF / REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES) TASK ORDER - U.S. EPA REGION 6 AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS INC. SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN WINNFIELD, LOUISIANA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-17. End: 2028-09-16.

What are the specific remediation activities planned under this contract, and how do they align with the site's known contamination?

The contract is for Remedial Action Framework (RAF) and Remediation Environmental Services (RES) at the American Creosote Works Inc. Superfund Site. Specific activities would involve the cleanup of hazardous substances identified at the site, likely including soil and groundwater remediation, containment, or removal, based on the EPA's Record of Decision for the site. The scope aims to mitigate risks to human health and the environment.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and milestones for this contract, and how will EA Engineering's performance be evaluated?

Performance will likely be evaluated based on adherence to the remediation plan, environmental compliance, project timelines, and budget management. Key performance indicators would include achieving specific cleanup targets (e.g., contaminant reduction levels), timely completion of remediation phases, and maintaining safety standards. The EPA will monitor progress against established milestones and deliverables.

What is the historical cost performance of similar remediation contracts awarded by the EPA, particularly those using a Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts in environmental remediation can be prone to cost overruns if the scope is not well-defined or if unforeseen site conditions arise. Historical data suggests that while CPFF allows flexibility for complex projects, it requires stringent oversight to control costs. Benchmarking requires detailed analysis of similar site complexities and contract management practices.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HERH22R0034

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 SCHILLING CIR STE 400, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,150,577

Exercised Options: $47,150,577

Current Obligation: $47,150,577

Actual Outlays: $46,589,718

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $42,261,280

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH19D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline