Air Force awards $68.2M for remediation services at Hill AFB, with 3 delivery orders issued
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $68,252,293 ($68.3M)
Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-09-26
End Date: 2020-09-24
Contract Duration: 2,920 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: HILL AFB PERFORMANCE BASED REMEDIATION
Place of Performance
Location: HILL AFB, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84056
State: Utah Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $68.3 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: HILL AFB PERFORMANCE BASED REMEDIATION Key points: 1. Significant contract value for environmental remediation services. 2. Competition method indicates potential for price discovery. 3. No small business participation noted. 4. Long contract duration suggests ongoing need for services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount is $68.2M over approximately 8 years. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for remediation services, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a substantial investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competitive offers and impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, aims to secure fair pricing. However, the impact on taxpayer cost is not fully determinable without knowing the reasons for source exclusion.
Public Impact
Environmental cleanup at a major Air Force base. Long-term contract impacting local economy and workforce. Potential for environmental impact mitigation and compliance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
- Long-term contract ensures service continuity.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services are crucial for government facilities to address hazardous materials and ensure regulatory compliance. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scale of contamination and cleanup requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. This represents a missed opportunity for small business engagement and economic contribution.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve program managers and contracting officers ensuring performance and compliance with contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition.
- No small business participation.
- Long contract duration may indicate potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Lack of detailed unit cost data hinders precise value assessment.
Tags
remediation-services, department-of-defense, ut, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $68.3 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. HILL AFB PERFORMANCE BASED REMEDIATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $68.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-09-26. End: 2020-09-24.
What was the specific rationale for excluding certain sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award?
The rationale for excluding sources in this type of competition is typically documented in the contract file. Common reasons include specific technical capabilities, past performance requirements, or unique security clearances necessary for the specialized remediation services. Understanding this rationale is key to assessing if the competition was truly optimized for value.
How does the per-unit cost of remediation services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar environmental cleanup projects?
Without detailed task orders and specific remediation activities (e.g., per cubic yard of soil treated, per gallon of water remediated), a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. Benchmarking would require access to the contract's CLIN structure and pricing details, alongside industry cost data for comparable environmental remediation projects.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics used to measure the effectiveness of the remediation services provided under this contract?
Effectiveness is typically measured against pre-defined environmental standards and regulatory compliance goals. KPIs would likely include metrics related to contaminant reduction levels, project timelines, adherence to safety protocols, and successful site restoration. The contract's Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) would detail these measurement criteria.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 225 SCHILLING CIRCLE SUITE 400, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $71,180,041
Exercised Options: $68,252,293
Current Obligation: $68,252,293
Contract Characteristics
Consolidated Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA890309D8560
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-09-26
Current End Date: 2020-09-24
Potential End Date: 2020-09-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-17
More Contracts from EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC
- Response Action Contract II — $68.8M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- This IS a Remediation Action Framework (RAF) Remediation Environmental Services (RES) Task Order (TO) to Provide Remediation to Source Material and Principal Threat Waste in Operable Unit 2 (OU2) Contaminated Soils and Sediments AT the Jackson Cerami — $68.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Remedial Action Framework (RAF / Remediation Environmental Services (RES) Task Order - U.S. EPA Region 6 American Creosote Works Inc. Superfund Site Remediation in Winnfield, Louisiana — $47.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- - Architect and Engineering Services for North Ridge Estates Remedial Action — $38.1M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Task Order 012 - Facility Expansion Construction for the Guam Commercial Port Improvement (gcpi) Program Igf::ot::igf — $33.2M (Department of Transportation)
View all EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)