Environmental Restoration LLC awarded $1.2M for emergency response services by EPA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,200,000 ($1.2M)

Contractor: Environmental Restoration LLC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-09-08

End Date: 2026-09-06

Contract Duration: 363 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, CASS TOY NEW TO SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE

Place of Performance

Location: ATHOL, WORCESTER County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01331

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $1.2 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC for work described as: CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, CASS TOY NEW TO SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE Key points: 1. Contract value of $1.2 million for emergency and rapid response services. 2. Services are categorized under Environmental Systems Protection. 3. Contract duration is 363 days. 4. The contract type is Time and Materials. 5. The award was made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 562910 for Remediation Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.2 million for emergency and rapid response services appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized work. However, without specific details on the scope of services and the urgency required, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar rapid response contracts for environmental remediation would provide a clearer picture of whether this pricing is competitive. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while a broad competition was initially intended, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the pool of bidders. The specific reasons for excluding sources are not detailed, which raises questions about the extent of competition achieved. A limited competition may result in less aggressive pricing compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the most competitive pricing achievable through a wider bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring rapid environmental remediation services. Services delivered include emergency response and environmental system protection. The contract is associated with Massachusetts, indicating a potential geographic focus. The contract supports the environmental remediation sector workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition could lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Time and Materials contract type requires diligent oversight to control costs.
Reasons for excluding sources in the competition are not specified, raising transparency concerns.

Positive Signals

Awarded to a single contractor, Environmental Restoration LLC, suggesting specialization.
Contract addresses critical needs for emergency and rapid response.
The contract is managed by the Environmental Protection Agency, a relevant authority.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation services sector is a critical component of environmental protection and compliance. This contract falls under the broader environmental consulting and remediation industry, which includes services like hazardous waste management, site cleanup, and emergency response. The market size for such services can be substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address environmental incidents. This specific contract, focused on rapid response, addresses a niche but vital part of the sector.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary focus for this specific award. There is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements being explicitly mentioned. This suggests that the contract was likely awarded to a larger entity capable of handling the specialized nature of emergency environmental response, potentially limiting opportunities for small businesses in this particular instance.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a Time and Materials contract, rigorous monitoring of labor hours, material costs, and adherence to the scope of work is crucial. Transparency would be enhanced by public reporting of contract performance and expenditures. The EPA's Inspector General would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this award.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Emergency Response Contracts
Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
Time and Materials Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price.
T&M contract requires close oversight.
Reasons for source exclusion unclear.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $1.2 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC. CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, CASS TOY NEW TO SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-08. End: 2026-09-06.

What is the track record of Environmental Restoration LLC in handling similar emergency response contracts?

Assessing the track record of Environmental Restoration LLC is crucial for understanding their capability and reliability in executing emergency and rapid response services. A review of their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those awarded by the EPA or other federal agencies, would reveal their success rates, adherence to timelines, and quality of work. Information on any past performance issues, disputes, or contract terminations would also be important. Without specific data on their prior engagements, it's difficult to definitively gauge their suitability beyond the current award. Federal procurement databases and past performance reviews can often provide insights into a contractor's history.

How does the $1.2 million contract value compare to similar EPA emergency response contracts?

Comparing the $1.2 million contract value to similar EPA emergency response contracts requires access to historical data on awards for comparable services. Factors such as the scope of work, geographic location, duration, and the specific type of environmental emergency addressed significantly influence contract value. If this contract is for a relatively standard scope of emergency response over a year, $1.2 million might be within the expected range. However, if similar contracts for more extensive or complex emergencies have been awarded for less, or less complex ones for more, it could indicate a pricing anomaly. Benchmarking against a portfolio of recent, relevant contracts is essential for a robust value assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for emergency environmental services?

The primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for emergency environmental services revolve around cost control and potential for scope creep. T&M contracts pay the contractor for the actual labor hours and material costs incurred, plus a fee. This structure can lead to unpredictable final costs, especially in emergency situations where the full scope and duration of work may not be immediately clear. Without stringent oversight, monitoring, and defined ceiling prices, there's a risk of inflated labor hours or unnecessary material charges. For taxpayers, the risk is paying more than necessary if the work is not managed efficiently or if the scope expands beyond the initial intent without proper justification and approval.

What does 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' imply for price discovery and taxpayer value?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies a nuanced approach to competition. While it suggests an initial intent for broad participation, the subsequent exclusion of specific sources indicates that the competition was narrowed. This exclusion could be due to various reasons, such as specific technical requirements, past performance issues with certain vendors, or socioeconomic program goals. However, if the exclusions were not well-justified or if they significantly limited the number of capable bidders, it could reduce the competitive pressure on pricing. Consequently, taxpayers might not benefit from the most aggressive pricing that could have been achieved in a truly unrestricted full and open competition, potentially leading to a less optimal value for money.

How does the NAICS code 562910 (Remediation Services) align with the contract's description of 'Environmental Systems Protection'?

The NAICS code 562910, 'Remediation Services,' broadly covers establishments primarily engaged in cleaning up sites contaminated with pollution or other hazardous materials. This includes activities like site remediation, hazardous waste site cleanup, and soil or groundwater remediation. The contract description, 'Environmental Systems Protection,' coupled with 'Emergency and Rapid Response Services,' suggests that the work performed under this contract likely involves addressing immediate environmental threats or system failures that require cleanup or containment. Therefore, the NAICS code aligns well, as remediation is a core component of protecting environmental systems, especially in emergency scenarios.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1666 FABICK DR, FENTON, MO, 63026

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,200,000

Exercised Options: $1,200,000

Current Obligation: $1,200,000

Actual Outlays: $80,019

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0121D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline