EPA awards $2.05M for Webster Mill Site remediation, focusing on emergency response services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,050,000 ($2.0M)
Contractor: Environmental Restoration LLC
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2025-06-16
End Date: 2026-09-06
Contract Duration: 447 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, ISSUANCE OF WEBSTER MILL SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE
Place of Performance
Location: NORTH ATTLEBORO, BRISTOL County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02760
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $2.0 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC for work described as: CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, ISSUANCE OF WEBSTER MILL SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE Key points: 1. Contract value of $2.05M for emergency and rapid response services. 2. Services are for the Webster Mill Site, indicating a specific environmental need. 3. Contract type is 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting a competitive process with specific justifications. 4. The contract duration is 447 days, ending in September 2026. 5. This award falls under the Environmental Restoration LLC's broader contract vehicle. 6. The PSC code F108 points to environmental systems protection.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $2.05 million for a period of approximately 1.5 years for emergency and rapid response environmental services appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized work. However, without specific details on the scope of work and the nature of the 'emergency' or 'rapid response' required at the Webster Mill Site, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar rapid response environmental remediation contracts would provide a clearer picture of pricing efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific circumstances led to the exclusion of certain sources. The exact reasons for this exclusion are not detailed, but it suggests a deviation from a purely open competition. The number of bidders and the specific criteria for exclusion would be crucial to understanding the extent of competition and its impact on pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: While the competition was not fully open, the 'after exclusion of sources' designation implies some level of vetting and comparison. Taxpayers benefit from a process that, even with exclusions, aims for competitive pricing within defined parameters.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and potentially local communities or ecosystems impacted by environmental hazards at the Webster Mill Site. The services delivered are emergency and rapid response environmental remediation. The geographic impact is specific to the Webster Mill Site in Massachusetts. Workforce implications would involve specialized environmental technicians and project managers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed scope of work makes it difficult to assess if the awarded amount is fully justified.
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants further investigation into the rationale and potential impact on price.
- Limited information on performance metrics for Environmental Restoration LLC on similar contracts.
Positive Signals
- Awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency, a key federal environmental regulator.
- Contract is for emergency and rapid response, indicating a critical need for environmental protection.
- The contract is a delivery order against a larger contract vehicle, suggesting established processes.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Environmental Services sector, specifically focusing on remediation and emergency response. The market for environmental remediation is significant, driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address historical contamination. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other EPA contracts for similar rapid response or emergency cleanup operations, as well as contracts awarded by state environmental agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary focus for this specific delivery order. There is no indication of small business set-asides. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist but are not explicitly detailed in this award notice. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal for this particular contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Environmental Protection Agency's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the delivery order's performance requirements and the terms of the master contract. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though specific details of the 'exclusion of sources' and the scope of work are not fully elaborated.
Related Government Programs
- EPA Superfund Program
- EPA Emergency Response
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
Risk Flags
- Competition level requires further scrutiny due to 'exclusion of sources'.
- Scope of work and specific hazards not detailed, impacting value assessment.
- Contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not closely managed.
Tags
environmental-services, epa, massachusetts, delivery-order, emergency-response, remediation, limited-competition, time-and-materials, environmental-restoration-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $2.0 million to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC. CONTRACT 68HE0121D0005, ERRS V, EMERGENCY AND RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES, ISSUANCE OF WEBSTER MILL SITE PSC CODE F108 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- ENVIRONMENTAL RE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-06-16. End: 2026-09-06.
What specific environmental hazards or conditions at the Webster Mill Site necessitated an 'emergency and rapid response' award?
The provided data does not specify the exact environmental hazards at the Webster Mill Site. However, 'emergency and rapid response' typically implies situations requiring immediate action to mitigate significant risks to human health or the environment. This could include sudden releases of hazardous substances, uncontrolled hazardous waste conditions, or imminent threats from deteriorating site infrastructure. Further investigation into EPA site assessment reports or incident logs for the Webster Mill Site would be necessary to determine the precise nature of the emergency.
What were the specific criteria for excluding sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award?
The data indicates the contract type as 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' (CT). This classification suggests that while the initial intent was full and open competition, certain potential offerors were excluded based on specific, documented criteria. These criteria could include factors such as past performance issues, inability to meet stringent technical requirements for emergency response, security concerns, or specific certifications required for the site. Without access to the justification document for excluding sources, the precise reasons and the number of excluded entities remain unknown, making it difficult to fully assess the impact on competition.
How does the $2.05 million award compare to typical costs for similar emergency environmental remediation projects?
Benchmarking the $2.05 million award requires detailed comparison with similar emergency environmental remediation contracts. Factors such as the type and volume of contaminants, the geographic location, the required response time, and the specific remediation technologies employed significantly influence costs. Contracts for rapid response often command a premium due to the urgency and the need for readily available resources and specialized expertise. A comprehensive analysis would involve reviewing historical EPA contract data for emergency response actions at comparable industrial or mill sites to establish a relevant cost range.
What is the track record of Environmental Restoration LLC in handling emergency environmental response contracts for the EPA?
The provided data identifies Environmental Restoration LLC (CO) as the contractor but does not offer details on their specific track record with emergency environmental response contracts for the EPA. To assess their capabilities and past performance, one would need to review their contract history, including the types of projects undertaken, their success in meeting deadlines and performance standards, any documented issues or disputes, and client feedback. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or agency performance evaluation reports would be essential for a thorough assessment.
What are the potential long-term environmental implications or planned follow-on actions for the Webster Mill Site following this emergency response?
This contract specifically addresses 'Emergency and Rapid Response Services' for the Webster Mill Site. Such contracts are typically designed for immediate mitigation of urgent risks rather than comprehensive, long-term site cleanup. Therefore, this award likely represents an initial phase of intervention. Potential long-term implications depend heavily on the nature of the hazards addressed and the success of the rapid response. It is probable that follow-on actions, such as detailed site investigations, feasibility studies, and full-scale remediation under separate contracts (e.g., Superfund), may be required to fully address the site's environmental condition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1666 FABICK DR, FENTON, MO, 63026
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,400,000
Exercised Options: $2,400,000
Current Obligation: $2,050,000
Actual Outlays: $571,728
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HE0121D0005
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-06-16
Current End Date: 2026-09-06
Potential End Date: 2026-09-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-04
More Contracts from Environmental Restoration LLC
- Region 6, Emergency and Rapid Response Services V (errs V) - for the Smitty's Supply Fire P00001 IS to ADD Funding to Allow Rapid Mobilization of Emergency and Rapid Response Services (errs) — $49.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Lower Darby Creek Area (D366) OU01 Implementation of 4TH Phase of Ldca OU1 Landfill Remedial Action. POC: Josh Barber 215-814-3393 — $30.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Region 6, Emergency and Rapid Response Services V (errs V) - for the Smitty's Supply Fire — $29.9M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Emergency and Rapid Response Services, Lower Darby Creek Area, Operable Unit 1, Landfill Remedial Action — $29.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Written Order to Confirm Verbal Given to Mitigate the Threats Posed by PCB Contaminated Soil Which WAS Discovered to Also Contain White Phosphorous, AS Well AS Unexploded Ordinance (UXO). Former Harry Goldberg & Sons Metal Site in Perth Amboy, NJ — $11.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)