J & J Maintenance Inc. awarded $2.77M for facilities support services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,768,393 ($2.8M)

Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-03-23

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,226 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DHAFE MTF OM LUKE

Place of Performance

Location: LUKE AFB, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85309

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.8 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: DHAFE MTF OM LUKE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value. 2. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks. 3. Performance is in Arizona, a key region for federal facilities. 4. The duration of the contract is substantial, indicating a long-term need. 5. Facilities support services are critical for operational continuity. 6. The award amount is within a typical range for similar services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $2.77 million over approximately 3.4 years appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for janitorial and maintenance services in the Southwest region suggests this pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, which is a positive indicator of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The fact that it was a BPA Call suggests it was sourced from an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, which itself was likely competed. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal agencies in Arizona will benefit from reliable facilities maintenance. Essential services such as cleaning, maintenance, and repair will be delivered. The contract has a geographic impact primarily within Arizona. Local workforce may be engaged for service delivery, supporting regional employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service quality variations given the long contract duration.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type limits cost escalation risks.
Contractor has secured a significant federal award, suggesting capability.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, encompassing a broad range of maintenance and operational activities, is a significant segment within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract fits within the government's ongoing need to maintain its physical infrastructure. Comparable spending in this category across federal agencies often runs into billions annually, highlighting the scale of such requirements.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This means opportunities for small business participation may be limited unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages them. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests the primary focus was on securing the best overall offer from the broader market.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As a BPA Call, it likely falls under the purview of the underlying BPA's oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. The specific Inspector General jurisdiction would be that of the GSA OIG.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
GSA Schedules
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Government Operations Support

Risk Flags

Potential for service disruption
Contractor performance variability

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.8 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. DHAFE MTF OM LUKE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-03-23. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of J & J Maintenance Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

Information on J & J Maintenance Inc.'s specific track record with federal contracts, especially in facilities support, is not detailed in the provided data snippet. A deeper dive into the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or other contract databases would be necessary to assess their past performance, including contract history, past performance ratings, and any history of disputes or terminations. This would help in evaluating their reliability and experience in delivering similar services to government agencies.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by GSA in the last fiscal year?

To compare the $2.77 million award to similar contracts, one would need to query FPDS for facilities support services (NAICS 561210) awarded by GSA in the relevant fiscal year, focusing on contracts with similar durations and scopes. For instance, if GSA awarded an average of 5-10 similar contracts in the $2M-$3M range with 3-4 year terms, it would suggest this award is within the expected market parameters. Without access to real-time comparative data, it's difficult to provide an exact benchmark, but the contract's value appears to be in a common range for such services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, facilities support contracts include metrics related to response times for service requests, quality of cleaning, preventative maintenance completion rates, and adherence to safety standards. These KPIs are crucial for measuring contractor performance and ensuring the government receives the expected level of service. A review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) would be required to identify these specific metrics.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the local Arizona economy and workforce?

This contract has the potential to positively impact the local Arizona economy by creating or sustaining jobs related to facilities maintenance, cleaning, and repair. J & J Maintenance Inc. may hire local personnel to fulfill the service requirements, contributing to regional employment. Furthermore, the company might engage local suppliers for materials and equipment, further stimulating economic activity within Arizona. The exact impact would depend on the scale of local hiring and procurement decisions made by the contractor.

Are there any specific risks identified in the contract's performance work statement or award documentation?

The provided data snippet does not detail any specific risks identified within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or award documentation. However, general risks associated with facilities support contracts can include service disruptions due to unforeseen events, contractor performance issues, or changes in government requirements. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract helps mitigate financial risks for the government, but performance risks remain and would typically be managed through contract surveillance and performance management processes.

How does the duration of this contract (1226 days) compare to the typical contract length for similar facilities support services?

A contract duration of 1226 days (approximately 3.4 years) is quite common for comprehensive facilities support services, especially those awarded by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA). Longer-term contracts allow for greater stability in service delivery and can lead to better pricing as contractors can amortize startup costs and invest in dedicated resources. Shorter contracts might be used for more specialized or temporary needs, but for ongoing operational support, durations of 3-5 years are standard practice.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFWA23Q0005

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: J & J Maintenance, Inc.

Address: 7710 RIALTO BLVD STE 200, AUSTIN, TX, 78735

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,568,631

Exercised Options: $3,321,529

Current Obligation: $2,768,393

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFRA20A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline