EMCOR Government Services awarded $2.55M for Facilities Support Services, with 3 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,552,036 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-07-15

End Date: 2026-11-14

Contract Duration: 487 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TIM IV OKC

Place of Performance

Location: GREENWOOD VILLAGE, ARAPAHOE County, COLORADO, 80111

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.6 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: TIM IV OKC Key points: 1. The contract's fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for the government. 2. A moderate level of competition (3 bidders) suggests a reasonably competitive market for these services. 3. The duration of the contract (487 days) indicates a medium-term need for facilities support. 4. The services fall under Facilities Support Services, a common and essential government function. 5. The contract was awarded under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting it leverages pre-negotiated terms. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags indicates this was not specifically targeted for small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award of $2.55 million over approximately 16 months appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities maintenance and management in federal buildings of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure inherently limits the government's exposure to cost overruns, which is a positive indicator of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, with three distinct bidders participating. This level of competition, while not exceptionally high, is sufficient to ensure that multiple vendors had the opportunity to present their best offers. The presence of three bidders suggests a healthy, albeit potentially concentrated, market for these specific facilities support services.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, with multiple bidders, likely resulted in a more competitive price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Federal employees and government operations within the specified facilities will benefit from reliable facilities support. Services include maintenance, repair, and operational support for government buildings. The contract's geographic impact is focused on Colorado, where the services will be delivered. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if follow-on work is not competitively bid.
Reliance on a single awardee for critical facilities operations could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Awarded under a BPA Call, potentially leveraging existing favorable contract terms.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) represent a significant segment of the government services market, encompassing a wide range of building operations and maintenance activities. This contract fits within the broader category of government contracting for essential operational support. Comparable spending benchmarks for facilities management across federal agencies often run into billions of dollars annually, highlighting the consistent demand for these services.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. While EMCOR Government Services is a large business, the analysis does not indicate specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses within this award. Further review of the contract details would be needed to confirm any subcontracting plans or goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees contracts awarded through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight mechanisms likely include performance monitoring, contract close-out procedures, and potential reviews by GSA's Office of Inspector General. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, where award details are publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Government Building Operations
Base Operations Support Contracts
GSA Schedules

Risk Flags

Contract duration may be insufficient for long-term infrastructure planning.
Limited competition could lead to suboptimal pricing if market dynamics shift.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical services poses operational risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.6 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. TIM IV OKC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-15. End: 2026-11-14.

What is EMCOR Government Services' track record with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, primarily in the realm of facilities support and construction. A review of public contract databases reveals numerous awards across various federal agencies, including significant work with the Department of Defense and the General Services Administration. Their performance history generally indicates experience in managing large-scale operations and maintenance, critical infrastructure support, and energy efficiency projects. While specific performance ratings for individual contracts are not always publicly detailed, their consistent receipt of awards suggests a satisfactory track record in meeting federal requirements for facilities management.

How does the $2.55 million award compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the GSA?

The $2.55 million award for facilities support services over approximately 16 months is within a common range for medium-sized federal service contracts. GSA awards numerous contracts for facilities maintenance, operations, and support that vary widely in value depending on the scope, duration, and complexity of the facilities involved. Contracts can range from tens of thousands for specific tasks to hundreds of millions for comprehensive base operations. This particular award suggests a need for robust, ongoing support for a specific set of government facilities in Colorado, likely encompassing a range of services beyond basic janitorial, such as HVAC, electrical, and plumbing maintenance.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of facilities support contract?

Key risks for this facilities support contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in government operations. There's also a risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen maintenance issues or price escalations, though the FFP structure aims to mitigate this for the government. Contractor personnel security and access control are critical risks, as is the potential for critical system failures if maintenance is not performed diligently. Furthermore, a lack of robust oversight could allow performance to degrade over time without timely intervention.

What is the expected effectiveness of these facilities support services for the government?

The expected effectiveness hinges on EMCOR Government Services' ability to maintain government facilities in optimal working condition, ensuring operational continuity and safety for personnel. Effective services should lead to reduced downtime of critical building systems, improved energy efficiency, and a well-maintained physical environment. This contributes to the overall mission readiness and productivity of the agencies housed within these facilities. Proactive maintenance and rapid response to issues are key indicators of effectiveness, ultimately supporting the government's real estate portfolio management.

How has federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) trended in recent years?

Federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) has shown a consistent and significant trend over recent years. Agencies across the government rely heavily on these services to maintain their vast real estate holdings, from administrative buildings to specialized operational facilities. Spending in this category typically fluctuates based on budget appropriations, infrastructure investment priorities, and the lifecycle of existing facilities requiring maintenance. Overall, it represents a substantial and stable portion of the federal services procurement budget, reflecting the ongoing need for operational upkeep of government assets.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFRA25Q0002

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Miller Electric Company

Address: 6363 WALKER LN, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,890,713

Exercised Options: $3,072,946

Current Obligation: $2,552,036

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFRA25A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline