GSA awards $17M facilities management contract to Jones Lang LaSalle for Ohio federal buildings

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,971,119 ($17.0M)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-08-01

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,399 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BPA CALL 47PF0022F0541 - STANDARD SERVICES FOR 7 MONTH BASE PERIOD FOR CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT CELEBREZZE, STOKES, METZENBAUM AND PEASE FEDERAL BUILDINGS, CLEVELAND & MEDINA, OH.

Place of Performance

Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44199

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $17.0 million to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: BPA CALL 47PF0022F0541 - STANDARD SERVICES FOR 7 MONTH BASE PERIOD FOR CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT CELEBREZZE, STOKES, METZENBAUM AND PEASE FEDERAL BUILDINGS, CLEVELAND & MEDINA, OH. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a BPA Call, indicating it's a task order under a larger agreement. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The duration of the contract is approximately 3.8 years. 5. The scope includes consolidated facilities management services for multiple federal buildings. 6. The awardee, Jones Lang LaSalle, is a significant player in the facilities management industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $17 million over 1399 days averages to roughly $12,131 per day. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal buildings is challenging without more specific service breakdowns. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government has negotiated a set price for a defined scope of work, which can be advantageous if the contractor efficiently manages costs. The absence of extensive modifications or change orders, if applicable, would further indicate good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple companies to offer their best pricing and service proposals to win the contract. This approach is designed to ensure the government receives competitive pricing and a wide range of solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors to the Celebrezze, Stokes, Metzenbaum, and Pease Federal Buildings in Cleveland and Medina, Ohio, will benefit from maintained facilities. Services include consolidated facilities management, ensuring operational efficiency and safety within these government properties. The contract supports federal agency operations by providing essential building support services. The contract is geographically focused on Northeast Ohio.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen facility issues arise that are not adequately covered by the fixed-price scope.
Dependence on a single large contractor for critical building operations.
Risk of service quality degradation if contractor resources are stretched thin across multiple sites.

Positive Signals

Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Consolidated services may lead to economies of scale for the government.
Experienced contractor likely to bring established best practices in facilities management.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector is a significant part of the broader commercial services industry, encompassing a wide range of activities from building maintenance and repair to security and cleaning. Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the government's extensive real estate portfolio. This contract fits within the government's strategy to consolidate services for efficiency and leverage economies of scale, often through large indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles or blanket purchase agreements (BPAs) like the one this call is under.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific BPA Call. This suggests that the primary competition was likely among larger, established service providers. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would be a key area to investigate for potential impacts on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration's (GSA) Public Buildings Service (PBS). Mechanisms likely include contract performance reviews, regular reporting requirements from the contractor, and potentially site inspections. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by setting a defined cost. Transparency would be enhanced through public contract databases and GSA's internal oversight processes.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Government Facilities Management Services
GSA Public Buildings Service Contracts
Consolidated Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Contractor performance risk impacting building operations.
Reliance on a single large contractor for critical services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $17.0 million to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. BPA CALL 47PF0022F0541 - STANDARD SERVICES FOR 7 MONTH BASE PERIOD FOR CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT CELEBREZZE, STOKES, METZENBAUM AND PEASE FEDERAL BUILDINGS, CLEVELAND & MEDINA, OH.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-01. End: 2026-05-31.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle in managing similar federal facilities contracts?

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. has a significant history of performing large-scale facilities management and real estate services for both government and private sector clients. While specific details on their performance for this exact GSA BPA Call are not publicly detailed in the provided data, their extensive experience in the industry suggests a capacity to handle complex contracts. A deeper dive into their past performance ratings on similar federal contracts, particularly those managed by GSA's Public Buildings Service, would be necessary to fully assess their track record. This would involve reviewing contract award histories, any reported performance issues or commendations, and their history of meeting delivery timelines and quality standards on comparable projects.

How does the average daily cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for federal building facilities management?

The average daily cost for this contract is approximately $12,131 ($16,971,118.63 / 1399 days). Benchmarking this figure requires detailed knowledge of the specific services included (e.g., HVAC, janitorial, security, groundskeeping) and the square footage of the facilities. Generally, federal facilities management costs can vary widely based on location, building age, security requirements, and the level of service. Without a detailed service breakdown and comparison to similar-sized federal buildings in the Ohio region or nationally, it's difficult to definitively state if this is high or low. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government sought a predictable cost for a defined scope.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for facilities management?

The primary risks with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for facilities management, especially one covering multiple large buildings, revolve around the contractor's ability to manage costs effectively while maintaining service quality. If Jones Lang LaSalle encounters unforeseen issues (e.g., major HVAC failures, unexpected structural repairs) that fall outside the clearly defined scope of services, they bear the financial burden, potentially leading to cost-cutting measures that could impact service quality. Conversely, if their cost estimations are overly conservative, the government might be paying a premium. Another risk is contractor performance degradation over time if incentives for efficiency or quality are not robustly monitored.

What is the expected effectiveness of consolidated facilities management services in this context?

Consolidated facilities management services are generally expected to improve effectiveness through economies of scale, standardized processes, and a single point of accountability. By managing multiple federal buildings under one contract, the government aims to reduce administrative overhead, streamline operations, and potentially achieve better pricing through volume. This approach allows the contractor to optimize resource allocation (personnel, equipment) across the sites. The effectiveness hinges on the contractor's ability to implement consistent service standards and maintain high levels of communication with GSA across all locations.

How does this contract's value compare to historical GSA spending on facilities management in Ohio?

To compare this contract's value ($16.97 million) to historical GSA spending on facilities management in Ohio, one would need access to GSA's historical contract databases and spending reports specifically for Ohio. This single BPA Call represents a significant investment for the specified buildings over its duration. Without comparative data on the total GSA facilities management spend in Ohio for similar periods or the number and size of other concurrent contracts, it's challenging to place this award in a broader historical context. However, it signifies a substantial commitment to maintaining these federal properties in the region.

Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs tied to this contract that indicate success?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics associated with this BPA Call. However, for a facilities management contract of this nature, typical KPIs would likely include response times for service requests (e.g., HVAC repair, plumbing issues), preventative maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, building cleanliness scores, and potentially occupant satisfaction surveys. The effectiveness of the contract is largely determined by how well the contractor meets these, often contractually defined, performance standards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 E RANDOLPH ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,363,212

Exercised Options: $16,971,119

Current Obligation: $16,971,119

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0022A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline