GSA awards $26.7K for facility repairs, including dock gate and heater, to Jones Lang LaSalle

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,709 ($26.7K)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-08-30

Contract Duration: 144 days

Daily Burn Rate: $185/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. ARE TO DOCK GATE SPEAKER REPAIR AND BASEMENT HEATER INSTALL UNDER BASE BPA 47PF0022A0012 AT IL0054ZZ CHICAGO 536.

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60605

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $26,708.85 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. ARE TO DOCK GATE SPEAKER REPAIR AND BASEMENT HEATER INSTALL UNDER BASE BPA 47PF0022A0012 AT IL0054ZZ CHICAGO 536. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized facility maintenance services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Contract duration of 144 days is appropriate for the scope of work. 5. Services fall under Facilities Support, a common category for GSA. 6. Geographic focus on Illinois is noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $26,708.85 for dock gate repair and basement heater installation seems aligned with industry standards for specialized facility maintenance. While specific benchmarks for these exact services are difficult to ascertain without more granular data, the fixed-price nature of the award provides cost certainty. Comparing this to similar GSA contracts for facility repairs in the region would offer further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which should lead to more favorable pricing for the government. The use of a BPA call suggests it was part of a larger pre-competed agreement.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive rates for services.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Chicago, Illinois, will benefit from improved infrastructure and operational readiness. Services include critical repairs to a dock gate and a basement heater, ensuring functionality and safety. The contract supports the General Services Administration's mission to manage federal property. Local skilled trades may be employed for the repair work, contributing to the regional economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
Details on the specific nature and extent of 'dock gate repair' are not provided, potentially obscuring scope creep risks.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a pre-competed BPA, suggesting a streamlined and potentially cost-effective procurement process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type offers strong cost control for the government.
Contract duration is clearly defined, providing a manageable timeframe for the work.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational services for government and commercial buildings. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from large corporations to specialized local firms. GSA, as a major property manager, frequently procures such services to maintain its vast portfolio of federal buildings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While Jones Lang LaSalle is a large corporation, there is no information provided on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the bidding process or as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. As a BPA call, the underlying BPA likely has established oversight mechanisms. The firm fixed-price nature provides some inherent cost control. Transparency is generally good for federal contracts, and any specific concerns would likely be addressed through GSA's internal processes or potentially the Inspector General if significant issues arise.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Public Buildings Service Repair and Alterations
Base Support Contracts
Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions during repair work.
Dependence on specialized labor and materials.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $26,708.85 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. ARE TO DOCK GATE SPEAKER REPAIR AND BASEMENT HEATER INSTALL UNDER BASE BPA 47PF0022A0012 AT IL0054ZZ CHICAGO 536.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26,708.85.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-08-30.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. with the General Services Administration?

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. has a significant history of contracting with the General Services Administration across various service categories. Their awards often span facilities management, real estate services, and consulting. Analyzing their past performance with GSA, including contract values, types of services rendered, and any documented performance issues or commendations, would provide context for this specific award. A review of their award history would reveal if they are a frequent and reliable contractor for GSA, suggesting a level of established trust and capability. However, without specific data on past performance metrics for this particular entity under GSA contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record beyond their general presence.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar facility repair contracts by GSA?

The awarded amount of $26,708.85 for dock gate repair and basement heater installation is relatively modest for a federal contract. To benchmark its value, one would need to compare it against similar GSA contracts for facility repairs, specifically those involving specialized equipment like dock gates and HVAC components, within the same geographic region (Illinois). Factors such as the complexity of the repair, the specific materials required, and the labor rates prevalent in the Chicago area would influence pricing. Without access to a database of comparable GSA repair contracts, it's challenging to provide a precise comparison. However, for specialized, localized repairs, this amount appears within a reasonable range, especially considering the fixed-price nature which caps potential government expenditure.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of facility repair contract?

The primary risks associated with this facility repair contract include potential scope creep, where the extent of the repairs might expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost increases if not managed carefully (though mitigated by fixed-price). Unforeseen conditions discovered during the repair process, such as hidden structural damage or complex system interdependencies, could also pose risks. Delays in material procurement or specialized labor availability could impact the project timeline. Furthermore, the quality of the repair work is a risk; inadequate repairs could lead to recurring issues or safety hazards. The effectiveness of the competition, even if full and open, could also be a risk if only a limited number of qualified bidders participated, potentially impacting price competitiveness.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition' strategy for GSA facility maintenance contracts?

The 'Full and Open Competition' strategy is generally considered highly effective for GSA facility maintenance contracts as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions. This approach ensures that a wide range of qualified contractors, including both large and small businesses, have the opportunity to compete, fostering a dynamic marketplace. For GSA, this typically translates into better value for taxpayer dollars. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the realistic requirements set forth, and the ability of GSA to properly evaluate the diverse proposals received. In some highly specialized niches, the pool of truly qualified bidders might be smaller, potentially limiting the competitive intensity despite the open nature of the solicitation.

What is the historical spending pattern for Facilities Support Services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a significant spender in the Facilities Support Services category, reflecting its role as the primary landlord for the federal government. Historical spending patterns show consistent and substantial investment in maintenance, repair, operations, and management of federal buildings across the United States. GSA's annual spending in this sector often runs into billions of dollars, encompassing a wide array of services from routine janitorial work and groundskeeping to complex HVAC, electrical, and structural repairs. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, modernization initiatives, and budget allocations. The agency utilizes various contracting vehicles, including Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) like the one referenced here, to streamline procurement for these recurring needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAF-26-0253

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 E RANDOLPH ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,709

Exercised Options: $26,709

Current Obligation: $26,709

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0022A0012

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline