GSA awards $11,816 for caulking repair in Philadelphia, PA, to Jones Lang LaSalle

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,816 ($11.8K)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-06-08

Contract Duration: 63 days

Daily Burn Rate: $188/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AWARD FOR FRONT STEPS CAULK REPAIR PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19106

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $11,816.28 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: AWARD FOR FRONT STEPS CAULK REPAIR PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA Key points: 1. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 2. The award was made under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-negotiated framework. 3. The fixed-price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost overruns. 4. The duration of the contract is short, approximately two months. 5. The service falls under Facilities Support Services, a common category for building maintenance. 6. The awardee, Jones Lang LaSalle, is a large, established real estate and facilities management firm.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $11,816.28 for caulking repair is a modest sum. Benchmarking this specific service is challenging without more detail on the scope of work (e.g., square footage, type of caulking). However, for a localized repair project of this nature, the price appears within a reasonable range for professional services. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the use of a BPA Call implies that the initial competition for the BPA itself was robust. This method generally promotes competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and users of the federal facility in Philadelphia, PA, who will experience improved building envelope integrity. The service delivered is essential building maintenance, specifically addressing potential water or air infiltration through caulking. The geographic impact is localized to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. There are no significant workforce implications expected from this specific contract award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited scope of work may not address larger facility maintenance needs.
Reliance on a single BPA call for a specific repair could indicate a reactive rather than proactive maintenance strategy.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting fair market pricing.
Fixed-price contract provides cost control for the government.
Award to a well-established firm like Jones Lang LaSalle suggests a higher likelihood of successful completion.
BPA Call mechanism streamlines the procurement process for recurring needs.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, including maintenance and repair, is a significant sector within the broader professional services industry. Government spending in this area is consistent, supporting the upkeep of federal buildings nationwide. This contract represents a small component of the overall federal investment in maintaining its real estate portfolio, which includes numerous buildings managed by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA).

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., a large corporation. There is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, this specific award does not directly benefit the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) has established oversight mechanisms for its contracts. As this was a BPA Call, the underlying BPA likely has its own set of oversight procedures. The fixed-price nature of the award provides a degree of accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases where contract awards are recorded.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
General Services Administration Facilities Management
Public Buildings Service Contracts
Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Contract duration is short, potentially indicating a limited scope or a stop-gap measure.
Specific details on the scope of work and deliverables are not provided, making value assessment difficult.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $11,816.28 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. AWARD FOR FRONT STEPS CAULK REPAIR PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11,816.28.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-06-08.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle with the federal government, particularly with the GSA?

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. has a significant history of contracting with the U.S. federal government, including numerous awards from the General Services Administration (GSA). Their portfolio includes a wide range of services related to facilities management, real estate services, and building operations. Analyzing their past performance on similar GSA contracts, especially those involving building envelope repairs or maintenance under BPA frameworks, would provide further context on their reliability and cost-effectiveness. Federal procurement data indicates they are a frequent awardee, suggesting a strong existing relationship and familiarity with government procurement processes and requirements.

How does the $11,816 award compare to similar caulking repair projects for federal facilities?

Directly comparing this $11,816 award for caulking repair is difficult without specific details on the scope of work, such as the linear footage of caulking, the type of material used, and the complexity of the access required (e.g., height of the building). However, for a localized repair project, this amount is relatively modest. Larger-scale envelope remediation projects for federal buildings can run into hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. This award suggests a targeted repair rather than a comprehensive overhaul. Benchmarking against similar small-scale, fixed-price repair contracts awarded by GSA in the Philadelphia region could offer a more precise comparison, but generally, for a specific repair task, this value appears reasonable for professional execution.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are potential performance issues (e.g., substandard workmanship, delays) and cost overruns if the scope is underestimated. However, these risks are mitigated by several factors. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) type, which shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle. The award was made under full and open competition, implying a selection of a qualified vendor. Furthermore, the short duration (approximately two months) and the specific nature of caulking repair limit the potential for significant deviations. The General Services Administration's oversight, coupled with the contractor's established reputation, further reduces performance risk.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the GSA in Philadelphia?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on facilities support services across the nation, and Philadelphia is no exception. Historical data indicates substantial annual outlays for maintenance, repair, operations, and management of federal buildings within the Philadelphia region. This spending encompasses a wide array of services, from routine janitorial work and landscaping to complex HVAC system maintenance and structural repairs. The specific category of 'Facilities Support Services' (NAICS 561210) is a major component of the GSA's operational budget. While this $11,816 award is a small fraction, it aligns with a pattern of ongoing investment in maintaining the federal real estate portfolio in the area.

Does the use of a BPA Call indicate any limitations in competition or potential for higher pricing?

A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call itself does not inherently limit competition if the underlying BPA was established through full and open competition. BPAs are essentially charge accounts that streamline the process for recurring or anticipated needs. The initial competition for the BPA establishes the terms and conditions, and subsequent calls are often competed among BPA holders or awarded to a single BPA holder if the BPA structure allows. In this case, the award was made under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' suggesting the initial BPA competition was broad. While BPAs can sometimes lead to slightly higher unit prices than a direct, large-scale procurement due to administrative efficiencies, they generally offer better value and faster delivery for specific, smaller-scale requirements compared to initiating a new full procurement each time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAD-26-0239

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 E RANDOLPH ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,816

Exercised Options: $11,816

Current Obligation: $11,816

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0321A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline