GSA's $48.9K contract for passport facility HVAC optimization in Philadelphia awarded to Jones Lang LaSalle

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,866 ($48.9K)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-10-09

Contract Duration: 183 days

Daily Burn Rate: $267/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PASSPORTS AHU OPTIMIZATION PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19106

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $48,866.18 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: PASSPORTS AHU OPTIMIZATION PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA Key points: 1. The contract value appears to be a minor expenditure within the broader facilities support services sector. 2. The award was made under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting a pre-negotiated framework. 3. The fixed-price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost overruns. 4. The short duration of 183 days indicates a project-specific, likely short-term need. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary contractor is not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities are not explicitly mandated. 6. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category with many potential service providers.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $48,866.18 for HVAC optimization is relatively small. Benchmarking this specific service is challenging without more granular data on the scope of 'optimization' for passport facilities. However, for facilities support services of this nature, the price seems within a reasonable range for a specialized, short-term project. The fixed-price nature provides cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The use of a BPA Call suggests that a competitive process likely occurred at the BPA level, with this call being a specific task order. The level of competition for this specific call is not detailed, but the initial BPA competition should have driven price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the General Services Administration (GSA) and potentially the Department of State, as passport facilities are often managed by GSA. The service delivered is HVAC optimization, aimed at improving the efficiency and potentially the reliability of climate control systems. The geographic impact is localized to Philadelphia, PA, where the passport facility is located. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving specialized technicians for the optimization project rather than significant new hires.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Scope of 'optimization' is not detailed, making it difficult to assess if the price adequately covers the work.
Limited duration may mean the optimization is superficial or a precursor to a larger project.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it hard to gauge success.
Potential for vendor lock-in if the BPA framework is heavily utilized by GSA.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle, is a large, established firm in facilities management, implying experience.
BPA Call mechanism can streamline procurement for recurring needs.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a broad industry encompassing a wide range of services for maintaining and operating buildings. This contract, focused on HVAC optimization, fits within the specialized segment of building systems maintenance and energy efficiency. The market for such services is substantial, driven by government and commercial entities seeking to reduce operational costs and improve building performance. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific type and scale of the facility and the optimization techniques employed.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Jones Lang LaSalle is a large corporation, not a small business. This suggests that the primary contract was likely awarded through a competitive process where large businesses could participate. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements, so the extent to which small businesses might benefit indirectly through subcontracts is unknown.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the GSA Public Buildings Service. Accountability is established through the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of the specified optimization services. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration Facilities Management Contracts
Department of State Passport Services Infrastructure
Federal Building Energy Efficiency Programs
HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services

Risk Flags

Scope Definition Risk
Performance Measurement Uncertainty
Limited Duration Impact

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $48,866.18 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. PASSPORTS AHU OPTIMIZATION PROJECT IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48,866.18.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-10-09.

What specific HVAC optimization techniques are being employed under this contract, and what are the expected energy savings or performance improvements?

The provided data does not specify the exact HVAC optimization techniques. 'Optimization' can range from simple recalibration of existing systems to more complex upgrades or integration with building management systems. Expected improvements are also not detailed. Typically, such projects aim to reduce energy consumption, improve air quality, enhance system reliability, and lower maintenance costs. Without a detailed scope of work or performance work statement, it's impossible to quantify the expected benefits or confirm the appropriateness of the price.

How does the $48,866.18 cost compare to similar HVAC optimization projects for federal facilities of comparable size and type?

Benchmarking this specific contract is difficult without more context on the scope of 'optimization' and the size/complexity of the passport facility in Philadelphia. However, for a project focused on optimization rather than major equipment replacement, a cost under $50,000 for a short duration (183 days) appears reasonable for a specialized service provider like Jones Lang LaSalle. Larger-scale HVAC upgrades or comprehensive building management system integrations would typically cost significantly more. The value proposition hinges on the specific improvements achieved relative to the investment.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle in performing similar HVAC optimization services for federal agencies?

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is a major global real estate services firm with extensive experience in facilities management, including building systems maintenance and energy efficiency projects. While specific details on their track record for 'passport facility HVAC optimization' are not provided in this data, JLL routinely manages large portfolios of commercial and government buildings, undertaking projects to improve HVAC performance and reduce energy consumption. Their size and market presence suggest they possess the capability and resources to execute such contracts effectively. A deeper dive into their past performance evaluations and specific project history would be needed for a comprehensive assessment.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Potential risks include the scope of 'optimization' being poorly defined, leading to disputes over deliverables or value for money. The short duration might indicate a limited impact or a need for follow-on work. Performance risk exists if the contractor fails to achieve the desired improvements. Mitigation strategies include the fixed-price contract type, which shifts some cost risk to the contractor, and the requirement for the contractor to be experienced (JLL). Clear performance metrics and acceptance criteria within the SOW would further mitigate performance risk. Oversight by a COR is crucial.

How does this contract fit into the broader context of GSA's spending on facilities management and energy efficiency initiatives?

This $48,866.18 contract represents a very small fraction of GSA's overall facilities management budget, which runs into billions of dollars annually. It aligns with GSA's broader goals of improving the efficiency and sustainability of federal buildings. Projects focused on HVAC optimization are common as they directly impact energy consumption, a major operational cost. While this specific award is minor, it reflects a consistent effort by agencies like GSA to maintain and enhance building systems, contributing to larger energy-saving targets and operational resilience.

What is the significance of this contract being awarded via a BPA Call?

Awarding via a BPA Call signifies that a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) was previously established, likely through a competitive process, allowing for streamlined ordering of specific services or supplies. This method is often used for recurring or anticipated needs. For taxpayers, it can mean faster procurement and potentially better pricing due to pre-negotiated terms and conditions at the BPA level. However, it also means the competition for this specific task order might be limited to pre-approved BPA holders, rather than the entire market.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAD-26-0237

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 E RANDOLPH ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,866

Exercised Options: $48,866

Current Obligation: $48,866

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0321A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline