GSA awards $6M facilities support BPA call to Property & Environmental Management Inc. for risk management surveys

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $603,268 ($603.3K)

Contractor: Property & Environmental Management Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-24

End Date: 2026-09-23

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RISK MANAGEMENT SURVEYS AT MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN REGION 4.

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN County, OHIO, 43229

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $603,268.18 to PROPERTY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC for work described as: RISK MANAGEMENT SURVEYS AT MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN REGION 4. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential risk management surveys for multiple buildings, indicating a proactive approach to property maintenance. 2. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. 3. A single award under a broader BPA suggests potential for streamlined procurement but warrants scrutiny of competition within the BPA. 4. The contract duration of one year aligns with the scope of survey work. 5. Services fall under Facilities Support Services, a broad category with many potential providers. 6. The award is not set aside for small businesses, suggesting a focus on specialized capabilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $6 million for a one-year period for risk management surveys appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts for property management and survey services would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature helps control costs, but the absence of detailed cost breakdowns makes a granular price assessment challenging. Without specific per-unit data for surveys, direct comparison is difficult, but the overall contract value seems aligned with the provision of specialized inspection and management services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, likely through a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call. While the specific number of bidders for this particular call is not detailed, the 'full and open' designation implies that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to compete. The BPA structure itself suggests a pre-competed framework, with individual calls then being awarded based on established criteria. This approach generally fosters competitive pricing and ensures access to a range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving competitive pricing and encouraging a wide pool of vendors to offer their best value.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating in Region 4 will benefit from enhanced building safety and compliance through these risk management surveys. The services delivered include comprehensive surveys to identify and mitigate potential risks within government-owned or managed properties. The geographic impact is concentrated within Region 4, covering multiple federal buildings. This contract supports the workforce of Property & Environmental Management Inc. and potentially subcontractors involved in conducting these specialized surveys.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited transparency on the specific metrics used to evaluate bids for this BPA call.
Potential for vendor lock-in if the BPA itself was not aggressively competed.
Scope of 'risk management surveys' could be broad, requiring clear definition to ensure consistent service delivery.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Focus on risk management surveys suggests a commitment to property safety and compliance.
The contractor, Property & Environmental Management Inc., is likely experienced in facilities support services.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a significant sector within the broader commercial real estate and government contracting industries. This contract falls under the management and maintenance of government properties, a consistent area of federal spending. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise in areas like environmental assessments, building inspections, and operational support. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary procurer of such services for federal agencies, managing a vast portfolio of buildings.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. This suggests that the competition was open to all qualified vendors, including large businesses, and that small business participation may be limited to subcontracting opportunities if the prime contractor chooses to engage them. The absence of a specific small business set-aside means that the primary focus was likely on technical capability and price, rather than specifically fostering small business growth through prime contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by setting the total cost upfront. Accountability measures would be tied to the successful completion of the risk management surveys as per the contract's statement of work. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed internal performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Property Management Services
Environmental Consulting
Building Inspection Services
Government Real Estate Management

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition if BPA was not widely competed.
Scope definition for 'risk management surveys' needs clarity to ensure consistent service.
Performance history of the contractor requires verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $603,268.18 to PROPERTY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC. RISK MANAGEMENT SURVEYS AT MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN REGION 4.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PROPERTY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $603,268.18.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-24. End: 2026-09-23.

What is the historical spending pattern for Property & Environmental Management Inc. with the GSA, and how does this award compare?

Analyzing the historical spending for Property & Environmental Management Inc. with the General Services Administration (GSA) is crucial for context. A review of federal procurement data would reveal the extent of their previous awards, the types of services rendered, and the associated dollar values. If this $6 million award represents a significant increase or decrease compared to prior contracts, it could signal a change in the company's role or the agency's reliance on their services. For instance, if they have consistently received smaller contracts for similar services, this larger award might indicate expanded responsibilities or a new, larger-scale project. Conversely, if they are a frequent, large-volume contractor, this award might be within their typical operational scope. Understanding their track record with GSA, including any performance issues or commendations, provides insight into their reliability and the potential risks or benefits associated with this new contract.

How does the per-unit cost of these risk management surveys compare to industry benchmarks or similar government contracts?

Determining the per-unit cost for these risk management surveys and comparing it to industry benchmarks or similar government contracts is essential for assessing value for money. Since the provided data does not include a specific per-unit cost or the number of units to be surveyed, a direct comparison is challenging. However, if the contract details specify the number of buildings or types of surveys, we could derive an average cost per building or per survey type. This derived cost could then be benchmarked against publicly available data for similar facilities support services. For example, if the average cost per building survey is significantly higher than the average reported by other agencies or private sector firms for comparable services, it might indicate potential overpricing or a scope of work that is more extensive than typical. Conversely, a cost below the benchmark could suggest a favorable deal for the government or potentially a less comprehensive service.

What specific risks are being assessed in these surveys, and what is the potential impact of failing to identify them?

The specific risks being assessed in these 'RISK MANAGEMENT SURVEYS AT MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN REGION 4' are not detailed in the provided data. However, in the context of facilities support services, these surveys typically encompass a range of potential hazards and compliance issues. This could include structural integrity assessments, environmental hazards (like asbestos or lead paint), fire safety compliance, security vulnerabilities, accessibility compliance (ADA), and operational efficiency risks. The potential impact of failing to identify these risks can be severe, ranging from significant financial liabilities due to property damage or regulatory fines, to safety hazards for building occupants, operational disruptions, and damage to the government's reputation. For instance, undetected structural issues could lead to building collapse, while missed environmental hazards could cause long-term health problems for personnel.

What is the track record of Property & Environmental Management Inc. regarding performance on similar facilities support contracts?

The track record of Property & Environmental Management Inc. on similar facilities support contracts is a key indicator of their capability and reliability. While the provided data does not include specific performance reviews or past performance information, a thorough analysis would involve examining federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for past contracts awarded to this company. This would reveal their history of on-time delivery, quality of work, and any reported disputes or contract terminations. Positive past performance on comparable contracts, especially those involving risk management surveys or comprehensive property assessments, would suggest a lower risk for this current award. Conversely, a history of performance issues, such as missed deadlines, subpar quality, or unresolved complaints, would raise concerns about their ability to meet the requirements of this new $6 million contract and warrant closer monitoring.

How does the $6 million contract value compare to the overall GSA budget for facilities support services in Region 4?

Comparing the $6 million contract value to the overall GSA budget for facilities support services in Region 4 provides essential context regarding its significance. Without access to GSA's specific regional budget allocations for facilities support, a precise comparison is difficult. However, GSA manages a vast portfolio of federal buildings, and facilities support services represent a substantial portion of its operational expenses. If Region 4 encompasses a large number of federal properties, $6 million might represent a relatively small fraction of the total annual spending on maintenance, repair, and operational support. Conversely, if Region 4 has fewer properties or if this contract covers a particularly specialized or large-scale survey initiative, the $6 million could represent a more significant allocation. Understanding this proportion helps in assessing whether this contract is a routine expenditure or a major investment within the region's facilities management strategy.

What are the potential implications of this contract being awarded under a BPA call rather than a standalone contract?

Awarding this contract as a call against a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) has several implications compared to a standalone contract. A BPA is a simplified acquisition vehicle that allows federal agencies to fill anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services by establishing charge accounts with qualified sources. This typically means the underlying BPA was already competed, potentially streamlining the procurement process for this specific call. For taxpayers, this can lead to faster award times and potentially lower administrative costs. However, it also means the competition for this specific call might be limited to vendors already on the BPA. The effectiveness of competition relies heavily on how the original BPA was structured and competed. If the BPA itself was broadly competed and includes multiple capable vendors, then calls against it are likely to yield good value. If the BPA was narrowly competed or has few participants, the competitive pressure for individual calls might be reduced.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQ1PS-25-0490

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6161 BUSCH BLVD, COLUMBUS, OH, 43229

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $603,268

Exercised Options: $603,268

Current Obligation: $603,268

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PE1924A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline