EEOC awards $2.9M contract for enterprise applications to AINS, Inc. (DBA OPEXUSTECH, INC.)

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,934,233 ($2.9M)

Contractor: Ains, LLC

Awarding Agency: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Start Date: 2023-09-17

End Date: 2026-09-16

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS - AINS, INC. (DBA OPEXUSTECH, INC.) WORK ORDER 1-EEOC - BASE YEAR (DATE OF AWARD TO 12 MONTHS) - REMAINDER: PENDING AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20036

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission obligated $2.9 million to AINS, LLC for work described as: ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS - AINS, INC. (DBA OPEXUSTECH, INC.) WORK ORDER 1-EEOC - BASE YEAR (DATE OF AWARD TO 12 MONTHS) - REMAINDER: PENDING AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration is 3 years, indicating a medium-term need for enterprise application services. 3. The primary agency is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), focusing on a critical government function. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to 'Other Computer Related Services,' a broad category. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 6. The award is a Delivery Order, suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.93 million over three years for enterprise applications appears to be within a reasonable range for government IT services. However, without specific details on the scope of work, deliverables, and comparable contract data for similar enterprise application support, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control, but the ultimate value will depend on the quality and efficiency of the services provided by OPEXUSTECH, INC.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially more competitive pricing for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition framework is a positive sign for market engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation from multiple vendors.

Public Impact

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will benefit from enhanced enterprise applications, potentially improving its operational efficiency and service delivery. Services delivered will focus on supporting and maintaining critical enterprise applications for the EEOC. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the EEOC is headquartered. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized IT personnel to manage and support these enterprise applications.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge contractor performance and adherence to service level agreements.
The broad NAICS code 'Other Computer Related Services' could encompass a wide range of activities, making it hard to pinpoint the exact nature of the services without further detail.
The contract is a Delivery Order, which might imply it's part of a larger, potentially less scrutinized, contracting vehicle.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The contract supports a key government agency (EEOC) in its mission-critical functions.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector, particularly within government contracting, is highly competitive. This contract falls under the 'Other Computer Related Services' category, which can include a wide array of IT support, maintenance, and development. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain and modernize aging IT infrastructure and develop new digital capabilities. Benchmarks for similar enterprise application support contracts vary widely based on scope, complexity, and duration, but a $2.93 million award over three years for a single agency's core applications is a moderate-sized engagement.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans exist.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's contracting officers and program managers. Standard government procurement regulations and contract management practices would apply. Transparency is facilitated by public contract award databases, but detailed performance reports or Inspector General involvement would depend on specific performance issues or audits.

Related Government Programs

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Support
IT Infrastructure Management
Software Maintenance and Support Services
Government IT Modernization Programs

Risk Flags

Funding Contingency
Lack of Specific Performance Metrics
Broad Service Category

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission awarded $2.9 million to AINS, LLC. ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS - AINS, INC. (DBA OPEXUSTECH, INC.) WORK ORDER 1-EEOC - BASE YEAR (DATE OF AWARD TO 12 MONTHS) - REMAINDER: PENDING AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AINS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-17. End: 2026-09-16.

What is the specific scope of 'enterprise applications' covered by this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact 'enterprise applications' covered by this contract. The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is broad. Typically, enterprise applications in a government context can include systems for human resources, financial management, case management, records management, or mission-specific operational software. To understand the scope, one would need to review the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), which would detail the specific systems, modules, and functionalities the contractor is responsible for supporting, maintaining, or enhancing. Without this detail, it's difficult to assess the full technical requirements and associated risks.

How does the $2.93 million contract value compare to similar enterprise application support contracts at the EEOC or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking this $2.93 million contract requires comparing it to similar contracts for enterprise application support within the federal government. The EEOC's overall IT budget and the proportion allocated to enterprise applications would provide context. Generally, IT support contracts can range from tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the complexity, number of users, and criticality of the applications. A $2.93 million contract over three years ($~977k/year) suggests a focused scope, possibly for a specific suite of applications or a particular phase of support (e.g., maintenance, minor enhancements). To provide a precise comparison, data on contracts with similar NAICS codes, agency types, and service scopes would be necessary. However, this value appears moderate for supporting core enterprise systems for a federal agency.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. In a typical government IT services contract, especially for enterprise applications, KPIs and SLAs are crucial for measuring contractor performance and ensuring service quality. These might include metrics such as system uptime, response times for issue resolution, patch deployment timelines, user satisfaction ratings, or the successful completion of enhancement projects. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it challenging to assess the expected performance standards and how they will be monitored. A thorough review of the contract's SOW or PWS would be required to identify these critical performance metrics.

What is the track record of AINS, Inc. (DBA OPEXUSTECH, INC.) in delivering similar enterprise application services to the federal government?

AINS, Inc., operating as OPEXUSTECH, INC., has a history of federal contracting. To assess their track record for this specific type of work, one would need to examine their past performance on similar contracts. This includes looking at contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Federal agencies typically consider past performance as a significant factor in award decisions. Without access to detailed performance data or a comprehensive review of their contract history, it's difficult to definitively state their track record. However, being awarded a contract by the EEOC suggests they met the agency's requirements and passed initial vetting processes.

What is the potential risk associated with the 'Remainder: Pending Availability of Funds' clause?

The clause 'Remainder: Pending Availability of Funds' indicates that while the base year of the contract is funded, subsequent periods (or specific tasks within the contract) are contingent upon future appropriations by Congress. This introduces a level of uncertainty for the contractor regarding the full duration and value of the contract. For the government, it means that funding can be de-obligated if appropriations are not made. While common in government contracting, especially for multi-year efforts, it represents a programmatic risk. It ensures that the government is not legally obligated to spend funds that have not yet been appropriated, but it can impact contractor resource planning and long-term project stability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - DATA CENTER

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 45310023Q0034

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1101 17TH ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20036

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,934,233

Exercised Options: $2,934,233

Current Obligation: $2,934,233

Actual Outlays: $2,636,217

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F576GA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline