USAID Modifies Contract by $3.65M for Management Consulting Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,053,286 ($36.1M)

Contractor: Ains, LLC

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2008-09-30

End Date: 2013-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,643 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS INITIATE TO 2 AND ADD FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,654048TAS::72 1000::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20523

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $36.1 million to AINS, LLC for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS INITIATE TO 2 AND ADD FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,654048TAS::72 1000::TAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to AINS, LLC for administrative management and general management consulting. 2. Significant funding increase of over $3.6 million. 3. Contract has been modified multiple times, extending its duration. 4. No small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value has significantly increased through modifications, raising questions about initial pricing and scope creep. The total value is substantial, and the per-unit cost is not readily available for comparison.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition may have limited price discovery and potentially led to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The modification adds $3.65 million to the contract, directly increasing taxpayer expenditure without a competitive bidding process to ensure the best value.

Public Impact

Increased spending on administrative management consulting services. Potential for less efficient use of taxpayer funds due to non-competitive award. Long contract duration suggests ongoing need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) are common across federal agencies. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on service complexity and duration, but significant modifications without competition warrant scrutiny.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business, nor does it appear to have provisions for small business subcontracting. This represents a missed opportunity for small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

The repeated modifications and significant funding increases suggest a need for robust oversight to ensure the continued necessity and cost-effectiveness of the services. Accountability for the justification of non-competitive awards is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, agency-for-international-development, dc, bpa-call, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $36.1 million to AINS, LLC. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS INITIATE TO 2 AND ADD FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,654048TAS::72 1000::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AINS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $36.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2013-03-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award and the substantial funding increase through modifications?

The justification for a sole-source award and subsequent modifications requires detailed documentation from the Agency for International Development. Typically, sole-source awards are granted when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. Substantial increases often stem from evolving requirements or unforeseen circumstances, but the lack of competition means these justifications are critical for ensuring taxpayer value.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar administrative management consulting services procured competitively?

Without access to detailed pricing structures and specific service deliverables, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the absence of competition inherently raises concerns that the pricing may not be as optimized as it could be under a competitive environment. A thorough review of the contract's historical pricing and task orders against market rates would be necessary for a definitive assessment.

What is the long-term impact of relying on non-competed contracts for essential administrative services?

Long-term reliance on non-competed contracts can stifle innovation, reduce overall government efficiency, and potentially lead to higher costs due to a lack of market pressure. It also limits opportunities for new or smaller businesses to enter the federal contracting space. This practice can create vendor lock-in and reduce the government's agility in adapting to changing needs or technological advancements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 806 W DIAMOND AVE STE 400, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $134,089,255

Exercised Options: $64,477,482

Current Obligation: $36,053,286

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: AIDIRME000600045

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-09-30

Current End Date: 2013-03-31

Potential End Date: 2019-11-21 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-18

More Contracts from Ains, LLC

View all Ains, LLC federal contracts →

Other Agency for International Development Contracts

View all Agency for International Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending