EMCOR Government Services awarded $26.1M for facilities support, with partial funding due to 2015 CRA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,094,323 ($26.1M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-12-15

End Date: 2015-12-15

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $71.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF NCR BOS FFP SERVICE FOR AWARD OPTION 4 (PARTIAL FUNDING DUE TO 2015 CRA)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.1 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF NCR BOS FFP SERVICE FOR AWARD OPTION 4 (PARTIAL FUNDING DUE TO 2015 CRA) Key points: 1. Value for money assessed against contract type and duration. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process. 3. Risk indicators include partial funding and contract duration. 4. Performance context is facilities support services. 5. Sector positioning within defense facilities management. 6. Spending benchmarked against similar facilities support contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $26.1 million for a one-year period appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities support services. However, the partial funding due to the 2015 CRA introduces a layer of uncertainty regarding the full scope and long-term commitment. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support in the DC area would provide a clearer picture of value for money, but the provided data suggests a standard rate for such services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of 5 bids indicates a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of the Navy by ensuring operational readiness through maintained facilities. Delivers essential facilities support services, including maintenance, repair, and operations. Geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia. Workforce implications include employment for personnel involved in facilities management and support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Partial funding due to 2015 CRA may indicate budget constraints or evolving requirements.
Contract duration of one year, while standard, limits long-term planning and potential for economies of scale.
Reliance on a single awardee for comprehensive facilities support can create dependency.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Multiple bids received (5) indicate a competitive market for these services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of the broader Facilities Management industry. This industry encompasses a wide range of services aimed at maintaining and operating buildings and infrastructure. Spending in this sector is often driven by government and commercial entities requiring specialized expertise to manage complex physical assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per-square-foot costs for maintenance and operational services across various facility types.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited for this specific award. However, the prime contractor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors depending on their internal policies and the specific needs of the contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring EMCOR to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Base Operations Support Services
Government Facilities Management
Department of Defense Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Partial Funding
Potential Budget Uncertainty

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.1 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. IGF::OT::IGF NCR BOS FFP SERVICE FOR AWARD OPTION 4 (PARTIAL FUNDING DUE TO 2015 CRA)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-12-15. End: 2015-12-15.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in the District of Columbia?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in the District of Columbia requires access to detailed contract databases and budget allocations over several fiscal years. Generally, such spending is driven by the operational needs of naval installations and administrative facilities within the region. Factors influencing spending include the size and type of facilities, the scope of services required (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping, security), and the prevailing market rates for these services. Historically, the Navy, like other branches of the DoD, allocates significant resources to facilities management to ensure readiness and maintain infrastructure. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure upgrades, new construction projects, or changes in service delivery models. Without specific historical data for this contract or similar ones in the DC area, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but it's reasonable to assume consistent, substantial investment in maintaining its physical footprint.

How does the awarded amount compare to the original estimated cost or budget for this requirement?

The provided data does not include the original estimated cost or budget for this requirement, making a direct comparison impossible. However, the contract was awarded at $26,094,322.88. Since it was awarded under full and open competition with 5 bids, the final award amount is likely a result of competitive pricing. If the award amount is significantly lower than any internal government estimates, it would suggest successful cost savings through competition. Conversely, if it aligns closely with or exceeds estimates, further analysis of the scope and market conditions would be warranted to assess value for money. The partial funding due to the 2015 CRA might also imply that the initial budget was adjusted or that the full scope was not funded initially.

What are the specific services included under 'Facilities Support Services' for this contract?

While the contract is broadly categorized under 'Facilities Support Services' (NAICS code 561210), the specific services typically encompass a wide range of activities necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. These can include, but are not limited to, general building maintenance and repair (e.g., plumbing, electrical, carpentry), HVAC system maintenance, janitorial and custodial services, groundskeeping and landscaping, pest control, waste management, and potentially minor renovation or alteration work. For this particular contract with EMCOR Government Services, Inc. for the Department of the Navy, the exact scope would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). The SOW would specify the required standards, performance metrics, and deliverables to ensure the facilities are safe, functional, and meet operational requirements.

What is the track record of EMCOR Government Services, Inc. in performing similar federal contracts?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a significant track record in performing federal contracts, particularly in the realm of facilities support, maintenance, and construction. As a subsidiary of EMCOR Group, Inc., it leverages extensive resources and experience. Federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, often award contracts to EMCOR for base operations support, energy efficiency projects, and comprehensive facility management. Their performance history can be reviewed through contract databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or SAM.gov, which often contain past performance information. Agencies typically evaluate a contractor's past performance as a key factor in source selection. EMCOR's established presence in the government contracting space suggests they have experience meeting the stringent requirements and compliance standards of federal agencies.

What are the implications of the 'partial funding due to 2015 CRA' on the contract's execution and future funding?

The notation 'partial funding due to 2015 CRA' (Continuing Resolution Authority) indicates that the contract was funded under a temporary appropriations measure rather than a full fiscal year appropriation. This often occurs when Congress has not passed a regular appropriations bill by the start of the fiscal year. Partial funding means that only a portion of the total contract value may be obligated at the time of award, or that the funding is limited to a specific period within the contract's performance timeline. This can impact the contractor's ability to fully resource the project from the outset and may necessitate follow-on funding actions as appropriations become available. For the government, it introduces uncertainty regarding the total commitment and potential need for reprogramming funds. It also suggests that the full scope of work might not be executed if subsequent appropriations are insufficient or delayed.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008006R0374

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,294,400

Exercised Options: $26,294,400

Current Obligation: $26,094,323

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008007D0374

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline