DoD's $24.5M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to EMCOR Government Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,539,772 ($24.5M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-12-17

End Date: 2014-12-15

Contract Duration: 363 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NCR BOS AWARD OPTION 3FFP PWD WASH

Place of Performance

Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20817

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.5 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: NCR BOS AWARD OPTION 3FFP PWD WASH Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle, indicating potential for future task orders. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The contract duration of 363 days is standard for this type of service. 5. The primary place of performance is Maryland, indicating a localized service delivery. 6. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without access to the parent IDIQ contract's pricing structure and other awarded task orders. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government secured a defined scope of work at a set price, which is generally favorable. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit costs for specific services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance) against market rates or similar government contracts for facilities support in the National Capital Region.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that it is a delivery order under an IDIQ suggests that the initial IDIQ vehicle itself was competed. The number of bidders for this specific delivery order is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust initial competition for the parent contract, which should theoretically lead to better price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation from multiple vendors.

Public Impact

This contract directly benefits the Department of Defense by ensuring the continued operation and maintenance of facilities. Services provided likely include a range of facility support functions such as maintenance, repair, custodial services, and potentially groundskeeping. The geographic impact is concentrated in Maryland, specifically the National Capital Region, supporting federal operations in this key area. The contract supports the workforce employed by EMCOR Government Services, Inc. in performing these essential facility management tasks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or service level agreements (SLAs) in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the quality of services delivered.
The duration of the contract is relatively short (one year), which might limit long-term strategic planning for facility maintenance.
Without details on the competitive landscape for this specific delivery order, it's hard to confirm if the best possible price was achieved.

Positive Signals

The use of a firm-fixed-price contract transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor, which is advantageous for the government.
Awarding under a full and open competition for the parent IDIQ suggests a commitment to leveraging market competition for value.
The contract is for essential facilities support services, ensuring operational continuity for a critical government function.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a broad category within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract falls under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 (Facilities Support Services). The market for these services is substantial, encompassing a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational support for government and commercial properties. Government contracts for facilities support are common across many agencies, with significant spending allocated annually to ensure the upkeep of federal buildings and installations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, it is unlikely that small businesses will be directly benefiting from this award as prime contractors. However, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses if EMCOR Government Services, Inc. chooses to engage them for specialized services. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring would likely involve regular reviews of service delivery against the contract's statement of work. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS-NG, which makes award details publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Repair Services
Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Support Services
Government Property Management
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues if contractor resources are mismanaged.
Risk of service disruptions if contractor fails to meet obligations.
Limited visibility into specific performance metrics without further data.
Contract duration is short, potentially leading to transition risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.5 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. NCR BOS AWARD OPTION 3FFP PWD WASH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-12-17. End: 2014-12-15.

What is the track record of EMCOR Government Services, Inc. in performing similar facilities support contracts for the federal government?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing federal contracts, including those for facilities support and base operations. A review of federal procurement data would reveal numerous awards to EMCOR across various agencies, such as the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and others. Their performance history on these contracts, including any past performance evaluations, contract modifications, or disputes, would provide insight into their capabilities and reliability. Analyzing their award history can indicate their experience level with firm-fixed-price contracts and their ability to manage large-scale facility operations. Specific details on past performance metrics would require deeper data mining beyond the scope of this summary.

How does the awarded amount of $24.5 million compare to other similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy or other agencies?

The $24.5 million award for this delivery order represents a substantial but not exceptionally large sum for a one-year facilities support contract, especially within the National Capital Region. Larger, multi-year Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts can easily reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar scopes of work (e.g., comprehensive facilities maintenance, janitorial, HVAC, minor repairs) and similar contract types (firm-fixed-price) awarded by the Department of the Navy or other agencies in comparable geographic areas. The fact that this is a delivery order under an IDIQ suggests it might be one of several taskings, and the total value of the parent IDIQ would offer a broader context.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of facilities support contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for facilities support contracts include service quality deficiencies, cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP), contractor performance failures, and potential disruptions to essential government operations. For this specific contract, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure mitigates financial risk for the government, as EMCOR assumes responsibility for cost overruns. Performance risk is managed through contract oversight, performance monitoring, and defined remedies for non-performance. Disruptions are mitigated by the contractor's obligation to maintain continuous service delivery. The short duration (one year) might introduce a risk of transition challenges if follow-on contracts are not awarded promptly.

What is the expected effectiveness of this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of the facilities it supports?

The effectiveness of this contract hinges on EMCOR Government Services' ability to deliver the contracted services reliably and to the required standards. As a firm-fixed-price contract, the expectation is that EMCOR will manage its resources efficiently to meet the scope of work, thereby ensuring facilities remain operational, safe, and well-maintained. The Department of the Navy's oversight and performance management processes are critical to ensuring effectiveness. If EMCOR meets its contractual obligations, the contract should be highly effective in maintaining the physical infrastructure and supporting the mission of the facilities it serves. The absence of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes a definitive assessment of expected effectiveness challenging.

How has federal spending on facilities support services evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit within that trend?

Federal spending on facilities support services has generally remained robust, reflecting the government's ongoing need to maintain its vast real estate portfolio. While specific figures fluctuate based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and infrastructure needs, the overall trend indicates consistent demand. This $24.5 million delivery order is a component of that larger spending picture. It represents a single year's allocation for a specific set of facilities, likely within a larger program or installation. Analyzing broader trends would involve examining total federal outlays for NAICS code 561210 and related categories over several fiscal years to identify growth, decline, or stability in this spending area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008006R0374

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,549,772

Exercised Options: $24,549,772

Current Obligation: $24,539,772

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008007D0374

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline