VA awards $44.8M in management consulting services to Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC over two years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,807,630 ($44.8M)

Contractor: Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2019-08-15

End Date: 2021-09-17

Contract Duration: 764 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: VECTOR - TOPR 19 - PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PPMSS)

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22031

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $44.8 million to ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC for work described as: VECTOR - TOPR 19 - PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PPMSS) Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in program and project management support. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a robust market for these specialized services. 3. Performance risk appears moderate given the firm fixed-price structure. 4. The contract duration of over two years allows for sustained support. 5. This award falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector. 6. The awardee has a track record of securing federal contracts in this domain.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award of $44.8 million over approximately two years for program and project management support services appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar large-scale federal contracts. The firm fixed-price contract type helps control costs. While specific per-unit cost data is not provided, the overall value suggests a substantial engagement for comprehensive management consulting.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple vendors were likely considered. With 8 bidders, the competition level was healthy, suggesting that the VA sought a competitive price and a range of capabilities. This level of competition generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for these services helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery.

Public Impact

The Department of Veterans Affairs benefits from enhanced program and project management capabilities. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include potential job creation within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector, a broad category encompassing strategic planning, organizational design, and operational improvement. The federal market for these services is substantial, with agencies frequently outsourcing specialized expertise to enhance program delivery and efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large, multi-year consulting contracts awarded to support complex government operations.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus, as the awardee is not identified as a small business, and the contract was not set aside for small businesses. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall solution through open competition, rather than specifically promoting small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Veterans Affairs. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

veterans-affairs, department-of-veterans-affairs, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, program-management-support, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, management-consulting, professional-services, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $44.8 million to ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC. VECTOR - TOPR 19 - PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PPMSS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-08-15. End: 2021-09-17.

What is the track record of Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC in securing and performing on federal contracts, particularly within the VA?

Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Veterans Affairs. While this specific contract is for a significant amount ($44.8M), a deeper dive into their contract portfolio would reveal the types of services they have previously provided, their performance ratings on past contracts, and their experience with similar program and project management support. Analyzing their past performance data, if available through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG or SAM.gov, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and expertise in delivering on government requirements.

How does the awarded amount of $44.8 million compare to typical spending on similar program management support services by the VA or other large federal agencies?

The $44.8 million awarded to Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC over approximately two years for program and project management support services is a substantial sum, indicative of a significant scope of work. To benchmark this value, one would compare it to other large, multi-year contracts for similar services awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, HHS, or GSA. Factors such as the specific deliverables, the level of expertise required, and the duration of the contract are crucial for a fair comparison. Without more granular data on the specific tasks and required skill sets, it's challenging to provide a precise benchmark, but this award appears to be in the upper range for such support services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess the success of this contract, and how is performance monitored?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. However, typical KPIs for program and project management support services often include adherence to project timelines, budget management, quality of deliverables (e.g., reports, plans, analyses), stakeholder satisfaction, and successful implementation of project management methodologies. Performance monitoring is usually conducted by the VA's Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and program managers, who track progress against milestones, review deliverables, and conduct regular performance reviews with the contractor. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that meeting the defined scope and objectives within the budget is a primary measure of success.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the VA's ability to achieve its strategic goals related to program and project execution?

This contract has the potential to significantly enhance the VA's ability to achieve its strategic goals by providing dedicated expertise in program and project management. Effective program management is crucial for the successful planning, execution, and completion of complex initiatives, which are common within large federal agencies like the VA. By outsourcing these functions to a specialized firm, the VA can leverage external best practices, improve efficiency, mitigate risks, and ensure that its programs are delivered on time and within budget. This support can free up internal VA resources to focus on core mission-critical activities.

How has the VA's spending on administrative management and general management consulting services evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit in?

To assess the evolution of VA's spending on administrative management and general management consulting services, one would need to analyze historical federal procurement data (e.g., from FPDS-NG). This analysis would reveal trends in total spending, the number of contracts awarded, and the types of services procured within this NAICS code (541611). This $44.8 million contract, awarded in late 2019 for a duration extending into 2021, represents a significant single award within this category during that period. Its size suggests a major initiative or a sustained need for comprehensive management support, potentially indicating an increase or a sustained high level of investment in these services by the VA.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ON Assignment, Inc.

Address: 2751 PROSPERITY AVE STE 260, FAIRFAX, VA, 22031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,807,630

Exercised Options: $44,807,630

Current Obligation: $44,807,630

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: VA119A17D0094

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2019-08-15

Current End Date: 2021-09-17

Potential End Date: 2021-09-17 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-06-06

More Contracts from Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC

View all Enterprise Resource Performance, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts

View all Department of Veterans Affairs contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending