DoD's $26M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to EMCOR Government Services Shows Strong Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,085,418 ($26.1M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-10-01

End Date: 2018-03-30

Contract Duration: 911 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF AWARD OPTION YEAR 1 FFP REGIONAL BOS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.1 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF AWARD OPTION YEAR 1 FFP REGIONAL BOS Key points: 1. Demonstrates strong value for money through a firm-fixed-price structure, mitigating cost overrun risks. 2. Full and open competition likely ensured competitive pricing and a wide range of potential bidders. 3. The contract's duration and scope suggest a stable, long-term need for facilities support services. 4. Performance context is critical; the success of this contract hinges on EMCOR's ability to meet service level agreements. 5. Positioned within the facilities support services sector, a vital component of government operations. 6. The award amount is significant but should be benchmarked against similar large-scale facilities management contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $26 million award for facilities support services appears to be a reasonable investment given the scope and duration. The firm-fixed-price contract type is a positive indicator for cost control. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the absence of significant cost overruns or contract modifications in the provided data suggests efficient management.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This process typically fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a robust selection process was available, likely resulting in a price that reflects market conditions.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider array of service providers, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of the Navy by ensuring the operational readiness and maintenance of its facilities. Delivers essential facilities support services, including maintenance, repair, and potentially other operational support functions. Geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, supporting federal operations in the nation's capital. Workforce implications include the potential for direct and indirect employment opportunities through EMCOR Government Services and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government buildings and infrastructure. This sector is critical for ensuring the functionality and safety of federal assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) or other branches of the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific contract. While this contract was not set aside for small businesses, EMCOR Government Services, as a large prime contractor, may have subcontracting opportunities that could benefit small businesses. Analysis of their subcontracting plan would be necessary to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms and service level agreements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and detailed oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, award-delivery-order, district-of-columbia, large-contract, base-operations-support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.1 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. IGF::OT::IGF AWARD OPTION YEAR 1 FFP REGIONAL BOS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-10-01. End: 2018-03-30.

What is EMCOR Government Services' track record with similar federal contracts?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, particularly within the facilities support and base operations services domain. Their track record includes numerous awards from various government agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and others. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or significant contract modifications on similar large-scale contracts would provide further insight into their reliability and capability. A review of their performance on previous contracts of similar size and scope would be crucial to assess their ability to consistently meet service level agreements and manage complex facility operations effectively. Their extensive experience suggests a strong understanding of government contracting requirements and operational demands.

How does the $26 million award compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?

Benchmarking the $26 million award against market rates requires a detailed understanding of the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping, security, etc.) and the geographic location (District of Columbia). Facilities support services in high-cost-of-labor areas like D.C. will naturally command higher prices. A comprehensive market analysis would involve comparing this contract's unit costs (if derivable) or total price against industry benchmarks for similar service portfolios provided to large organizations or government entities. Given the firm-fixed-price nature and full and open competition, it is likely that the price reflects competitive market conditions. However, without specific service breakdowns and detailed market data, a precise comparison to 'market rates' is challenging.

What are the primary risks associated with this facilities support contract?

The primary risks associated with this facilities support contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, EMCOR Government Services, leading to disruptions in essential services. Scope creep, where the requirements expand beyond the original contract terms without adequate adjustment, could lead to cost overruns or resource strain. There's also a risk related to contractor personnel turnover, which could impact service quality and continuity. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure support presents a risk if the contractor faces financial instability or operational challenges. Diligent contract management, clear performance metrics, and robust oversight are essential to mitigate these risks.

How effective has EMCOR Government Services been in delivering facilities support services under previous DoD contracts?

Assessing the effectiveness of EMCOR Government Services requires a review of their past performance evaluations on similar Department of Defense (DoD) contracts. Publicly available data, such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports, would offer insights into their timeliness, quality of service, cost control, and overall customer satisfaction. While the current contract award data doesn't detail past performance, a deeper dive into their history with the DoD would reveal patterns of success or areas needing improvement. Generally, contractors with a strong history of successful contract completions with the DoD are more likely to perform well on subsequent awards, but continuous monitoring is always necessary.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services within the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support services within the Department of the Navy (DoN) are substantial, reflecting the vast real estate and infrastructure portfolio managed by the service. The DoN consistently awards numerous contracts for base operations, maintenance, repair, and related services across its numerous installations worldwide. Spending in this category is driven by the need to maintain operational readiness, ensure safety, and comply with environmental regulations. Analyzing historical spending data would reveal trends in contract types (FFP, cost-plus), competition levels, and average award values for similar services. This contract represents a portion of that broader, ongoing investment in maintaining naval infrastructure.

What is the significance of the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type for this award?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is highly significant for this award as it places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor, EMCOR Government Services. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently and perform the work within the agreed-upon price. For the government, FFP contracts offer budget certainty and predictability, as the total cost is known upfront, assuming no changes to the contract scope. This is particularly beneficial for services with well-defined requirements, like facilities support, where performance standards can be clearly articulated. It minimizes the government's financial exposure to unforeseen cost increases during contract performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008009R0478

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,085,418

Exercised Options: $26,085,418

Current Obligation: $26,085,418

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(G)

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008010D0464

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-10-01

Current End Date: 2018-03-30

Potential End Date: 2018-03-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-02-22

More Contracts from Emcor Government Services, Inc

View all Emcor Government Services, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending