Treasury's $6.6M Generator Maintenance Contract Awarded to Brown Point Facility Management Solutions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $66,000 ($66.0K)

Contractor: Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2024-09-23

End Date: 2026-09-22

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $91/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: GENERATOR MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20228

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $66,000 to BROWN POINT FACILITY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential generator maintenance for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. Duration of 729 days provides a stable period for service delivery. 5. The contract is for facilities support services, a critical operational need. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.6 million over approximately two years for generator maintenance appears reasonable for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for generator maintenance across federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government, assuming the scope of work is well-defined. The contractor, Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC, will be responsible for ensuring the operational readiness of critical backup power systems.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While two bidders are better than one, a higher number of bids typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government. The specific details of the bidding process and the evaluation criteria would further illuminate the effectiveness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of providers to compete, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality through market forces.

Public Impact

The Bureau of Engraving and Printing benefits from reliable backup power, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Essential facilities support services are delivered to a key government printing facility. The contract's impact is localized to the District of Columbia, where the facility is located. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition if only two bids were received.
Scope creep risk in firm-fixed-price contracts if not managed tightly.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition allows for broad market participation.
Contract duration offers stability for service provision.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad sector encompassing a range of services necessary for the operation of buildings and other facilities. This contract falls within the government's significant spending on maintaining its infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the total federal expenditure on facilities maintenance and operations, which often runs into billions of dollars annually across various agencies. This specific contract represents a small portion of that overall spending.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates the awardee is not a small business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are likely limited unless they are subcontractors to the prime awardee, Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to meet specific performance standards. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and inspection reports may not be publicly accessible. The Inspector General for the Department of the Treasury may have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if fraud or mismanagement is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Government Infrastructure Support Services
Bureau of Engraving and Printing Operations
Department of the Treasury Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition
Contractor performance risk
Scope creep risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $66,000 to BROWN POINT FACILITY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. GENERATOR MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BROWN POINT FACILITY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $66,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-23. End: 2026-09-22.

What is the track record of Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC with federal contracts?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Brown Point Facility Management Solutions, LLC has been awarded multiple federal contracts, primarily in the facilities support and maintenance domain. These contracts have been with various agencies, including the Department of the Treasury and others. The value and scope of these previous awards would need to be analyzed to assess the contractor's experience and performance history relevant to generator maintenance. Understanding the types of services previously rendered and the contract types (e.g., fixed-price, cost-plus) can provide insights into their capabilities and reliability in fulfilling government requirements. A deeper dive into past performance evaluations, if available, would offer a more comprehensive picture of their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar generator maintenance services?

To assess the value for money, the awarded price of approximately $6.6 million over two years for generator maintenance needs to be benchmarked against prevailing market rates. This involves researching the average cost of similar generator maintenance contracts awarded by other federal agencies or state and local governments for facilities of comparable size and complexity. Factors such as the number and type of generators, the scope of preventive and corrective maintenance required, and the geographic location of the facility influence pricing. Without access to detailed market research conducted by the agency or comparative contract data, it is difficult to definitively state whether this price is competitive. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests an expectation of cost control.

What are the primary risks associated with this generator maintenance contract?

Key risks for this generator maintenance contract include potential contractor underperformance, leading to equipment failure and operational disruptions for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Given the firm-fixed-price structure, there's a risk of scope creep if the government requires additional services not initially defined, potentially leading to disputes or change orders. Another risk is the contractor's financial stability or capacity to handle emergency repairs promptly. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance poses a risk if the contractor faces unforeseen challenges. Ensuring robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigating these risks.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in managing costs for this service?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective for managing costs when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For generator maintenance, where routine tasks and expected repair needs can be reasonably anticipated, FFP provides cost certainty for the government. It shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to perform efficiently. However, if unforeseen technical issues arise or the scope expands beyond initial expectations, the contractor may seek change orders, potentially increasing the total cost. Effective management and clear definition of services are paramount to realizing the cost-control benefits of FFP.

What is the historical spending pattern for generator maintenance at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for generator maintenance at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) is crucial for understanding the context of this $6.6 million award. This would involve examining previous contracts for similar services, their values, durations, and the contractors involved. Significant year-over-year increases or decreases in spending could indicate changes in equipment condition, service requirements, or procurement strategies. Comparing the current contract's value and duration to historical data can help determine if this award represents a consistent level of investment, an increase due to aging infrastructure, or a potential cost-saving measure. Without access to BEP's historical procurement records, this analysis remains speculative.

What are the implications of awarding this contract under full and open competition with only two bids?

Awarding this contract under full and open competition with only two bids suggests a moderately competitive environment. While it adheres to the principle of allowing all eligible sources to compete, the limited number of bidders might indicate potential barriers to entry, such as specialized requirements, contractor capacity limitations, or insufficient market awareness. From a taxpayer perspective, two bids may not guarantee the lowest possible price compared to a scenario with numerous competing offers. It raises questions about whether the competition was robust enough to drive optimal price discovery. Further investigation into why only two bids were submitted could reveal insights into market dynamics or procurement strategy effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 614 GEORGE WASHINGTON HWY, LINCOLN, RI, 02865

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $168,600

Exercised Options: $66,000

Current Obligation: $66,000

Actual Outlays: $29,550

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA21D002K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline