State Department awards $470K facilities support contract to Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $469,675 ($469.7K)

Contractor: Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2024-02-26

End Date: 2025-09-30

Contract Duration: 582 days

Daily Burn Rate: $807/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: INL BOGOTA - PD&S TASK ORDER

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $469,675.21 to OLGOONIK WORLDWIDE SERVICES LLC for work described as: INL BOGOTA - PD&S TASK ORDER Key points: 1. The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 2. The duration of the contract is 582 days, suggesting a medium-term need for services. 3. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 4. The award is a delivery order against a larger contract, implying it's part of an existing framework. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services. 6. The awarding agency is the Department of State, indicating a need for support at one of their facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $470K for a period of 582 days (about 19 months) suggests a monthly expenditure of roughly $81K. Without specific details on the scope of facilities support services, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure value for money, as it can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively. The absence of a small business set-aside might indicate that the scope of work or required expertise was not specifically tailored for smaller enterprises.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This suggests that while the competition was open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, possibly due to specific requirements or prior performance issues. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid, which generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, despite the exclusion of some sources, is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and service levels to secure the contract.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely personnel at the Department of State facility where these services are being rendered. The services delivered include facilities support, which could encompass maintenance, repair, janitorial, or other operational support. The geographic impact is localized to the specific facility managed by the Department of State. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of individuals by Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC for the duration of the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants further investigation into the reasons for exclusion.
Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs in the provided data makes it hard to assess service quality.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
The contract is for facilities support, a critical function for government operations.
The contractor, Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC, is likely experienced in providing such services.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of service providers, from large corporations to specialized small businesses. The market size for government facilities support is substantial, driven by the vast real estate portfolio managed by federal agencies. This contract represents a small portion of overall federal spending on facilities maintenance and operations, which is crucial for maintaining government infrastructure and ensuring operational continuity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the scope of work or the required qualifications were likely beyond the typical capacity or specialization of small businesses, or that larger, more experienced contractors were deemed more suitable. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans, so the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, but it implies that opportunities for small business subcontracting may be limited unless explicitly required by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of State's contracting officer and their representatives. As a delivery order against a larger contract, there may be existing oversight mechanisms in place. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where this award is recorded. However, specific details on performance monitoring, quality assurance, and dispute resolution processes are not provided in this data snippet. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Repair Services
Base Operations Support Services
Logistics and Support Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type
Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion
Lack of detailed scope of work in provided data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $469,675.21 to OLGOONIK WORLDWIDE SERVICES LLC. INL BOGOTA - PD&S TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OLGOONIK WORLDWIDE SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $469,675.21.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-02-26. End: 2025-09-30.

What is the specific scope of 'Facilities Support Services' covered under this contract?

The provided data identifies the contract under NAICS code 561210, which encompasses Facilities Support Services. This broad category typically includes services such as building operation and maintenance, cleaning, groundskeeping, pest control, and security services. However, the precise services rendered under this specific task order are not detailed. For instance, it could range from routine janitorial and landscaping to more complex building systems maintenance, HVAC repair, or minor renovation work. A more granular understanding of the Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to ascertain the exact nature and extent of the facilities support provided to the Department of State facility.

How does the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar services?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not clearly defined or when the duration and effort required are uncertain. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for the actual cost of labor (at specified hourly rates) and materials, plus a fee or profit. While offering flexibility, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns for the government compared to fixed-price contracts, as the final cost is not predetermined. For facilities support, fixed-price contracts are often preferred for routine services like janitorial or landscaping where the scope is predictable. However, for undefined repair or maintenance tasks, T&M can be appropriate if stringent oversight and labor hour limitations are imposed to control costs.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method, while aiming for broad competition, introduces a layer of complexity and potential risk. The 'exclusion of sources' implies that certain potential bidders were deliberately not invited to compete or were disqualified before the main solicitation. The risks lie in understanding the justification for this exclusion. If the exclusion was based on arbitrary or flawed criteria, it could limit the pool of qualified bidders, potentially leading to less competitive pricing or reduced innovation. It also raises questions about fairness and transparency in the procurement process. A thorough review of the agency's justification for excluding specific sources is crucial to ensure the integrity of the competition and to mitigate risks of protests or perceived impropriety.

What is the track record of Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC in providing facilities support to the federal government?

Olgoonik Worldwide Services LLC has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to facilities support and base operations. Analyzing their past performance data, available through federal procurement databases, would reveal their experience with similar task orders, contract values, and agencies. Key indicators to examine include on-time delivery, quality of services, adherence to budget, and any past performance issues or contract disputes. A positive track record with the Department of State or other agencies for similar services would suggest a lower risk for this current award. Conversely, any documented performance deficiencies would warrant closer scrutiny of this new contract's oversight and management.

How does the $470K contract value compare to historical spending on facilities support by the Department of State?

The $470K award represents a specific task order for facilities support services. To contextualize this value, it would be beneficial to compare it against the Department of State's overall historical spending on facilities support. This includes examining the total annual expenditure on such services, the average value of individual contracts or task orders, and the number of vendors the Department typically engages. If this $470K award is a typical size for a task order of this duration (approx. 19 months) and scope, it suggests standard procurement practices. However, if it appears significantly higher or lower than historical benchmarks, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing/underbidding, necessitating further investigation into the specific services required and market rates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 19AQMM22R0154

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3201 C ST STE 700, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $593,965

Exercised Options: $593,965

Current Obligation: $469,675

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19AQMM23D0049

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline