DOJ's $3.7M BI Suite contract awarded to TyGart Technology Inc. for FBI needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,756,516 ($3.8M)

Contractor: Tygart Technology Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2026-12-24

Contract Duration: 451 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (BI) SUITE

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRMONT, MARION County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26554

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3.8 million to TYGART TECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (BI) SUITE Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the Time and Materials pricing structure, which can fluctuate based on actual effort. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting a competitive environment for this requirement. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with the primary risk being potential cost overruns inherent in Time and Materials contracts. 4. Performance context is tied to the FBI's need for business intelligence capabilities. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on data analytics and business intelligence solutions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value is assessed based on its Time and Materials (T&M) pricing. While the total ceiling is $3.7 million, the actual expenditure will depend on the hours worked and the rates applied. Benchmarking T&M contracts is challenging without detailed labor categories and rates, but the duration and scope suggest a reasonable, albeit not exceptionally low, price point for specialized BI services. Further analysis would require comparing specific labor rates against market averages for similar skill sets.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but a full and open process generally suggests a healthy level of competition, which can drive down prices and improve the quality of proposals. The agency's decision to use this procurement method implies confidence in achieving a competitive outcome.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition provides taxpayers with assurance that the government sought the best possible value by allowing a wide range of potential contractors to bid, fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more cost-effective solutions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which will receive enhanced business intelligence capabilities. Services delivered will likely include data analysis, reporting, and visualization tools to support FBI operations. The geographic impact is primarily within the FBI's operational areas, though the specific location of service delivery is not detailed. Workforce implications may involve the need for skilled IT professionals and data analysts to implement and manage the BI suite.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The Business Intelligence (BI) market is a significant segment of the IT services industry, encompassing software, hardware, and services related to data analysis, visualization, and reporting. Federal spending in this area is substantial as agencies increasingly rely on data to improve operational efficiency, security, and decision-making. This contract fits within the broader trend of federal agencies investing in advanced analytics to manage complex datasets and gain actionable insights. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve looking at other federal contracts for BI software, implementation, and support services across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb: false'. Furthermore, the 'ss' (small business subcontracting) is also false. This suggests that small businesses are not specifically targeted for set-aside portions or subcontracting opportunities within this particular award. The implications for the small business ecosystem are that this specific contract may not directly contribute to their growth or participation, though TyGart Technology Inc. may engage small businesses in other capacities not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the FBI. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise concerning this contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, business-intelligence, data-analytics, department-of-justice, federal-bureau-of-investigation, tygart-technology-inc, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, west-virginia, it-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3.8 million to TYGART TECHNOLOGY INC. BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (BI) SUITE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TYGART TECHNOLOGY INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2026-12-24.

What is TyGart Technology Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly for Business Intelligence solutions?

TyGart Technology Inc. has a history of federal contracting, though specific details on their Business Intelligence (BI) solution delivery require deeper investigation. Examining their past performance on similar contracts, especially those involving data analytics, software implementation, and IT services for agencies like the Department of Justice or FBI, would provide crucial context. A review of their contract history in FPDS or other federal procurement databases would reveal the types of services they have provided, their performance ratings (if available), and any significant issues encountered. Understanding their experience with complex IT projects and their ability to meet deadlines and performance metrics is key to assessing their capability for this BI suite contract.

How does the $3.7 million ceiling compare to similar BI suite contracts awarded by the FBI or DOJ?

Benchmarking the $3.7 million ceiling requires comparing it against similar Business Intelligence (BI) suite contracts awarded by the FBI or the Department of Justice (DOJ) for comparable scope and duration. Without specific details on the deliverables, user base, and complexity of the BI solution, a direct comparison is difficult. However, federal spending on BI tools and services can range significantly, from smaller departmental licenses to large-scale enterprise-wide implementations costing tens of millions. If this contract covers a specific bureau or division's needs for a defined period, the $3.7 million might be within a reasonable range. A more precise assessment would involve analyzing the number of users, the types of data sources integrated, the required analytical capabilities, and the contract's period of performance against other relevant awards.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for a BI suite, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for a Business Intelligence (BI) suite is the potential for cost overruns, as the final price is not fixed and depends on the actual labor hours expended and materials used. This can lead to unpredictable spending for the government. Mitigation strategies typically involve establishing a clear ceiling price, closely monitoring contractor hours and progress, defining specific task orders with estimated efforts, and implementing robust oversight by the government's technical team. Strong contract administration, regular performance reviews, and clear communication channels with the contractor are essential to ensure that the work stays within scope and budget, and that the government receives value for the hours billed.

What specific performance metrics or KPIs will be used to evaluate the success of this BI suite implementation?

The specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this Business Intelligence (BI) suite contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, typical KPIs for such implementations often include metrics related to system uptime and availability, data accuracy and timeliness, user adoption rates, report generation speed, and the successful integration of various data sources. For the FBI, success might also be measured by the impact on operational efficiency, improved decision-making speed, or enhanced analytical capabilities for investigations. The contract likely includes a Performance Work Statement (PWS) that outlines these specific metrics and the acceptable performance levels, which will be used by the government to evaluate the contractor's performance throughout the contract period.

How does this contract align with the FBI's broader IT modernization strategy and data management goals?

This contract for a Business Intelligence (BI) suite directly aligns with the FBI's broader IT modernization strategy and data management goals by providing essential tools for leveraging vast amounts of data. Modern law enforcement agencies increasingly rely on advanced analytics to process, analyze, and derive insights from complex datasets related to criminal activity, investigations, and operational performance. A robust BI capability enables the FBI to move towards more data-driven decision-making, enhance situational awareness, identify patterns, and improve the efficiency of its operations. This investment supports the agency's objective to modernize its technological infrastructure and enhance its analytical capabilities in an evolving threat landscape.

What is the historical spending trend for BI solutions within the Department of Justice or the FBI?

Historical spending trends for Business Intelligence (BI) solutions within the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the FBI are not explicitly provided in the data. However, it is generally understood that federal agencies, including law enforcement and intelligence bodies, have been progressively increasing their investments in data analytics and BI capabilities over the past decade. This trend is driven by the need to manage large, disparate datasets, improve operational effectiveness, and enhance national security. To ascertain specific historical spending patterns for the FBI or DOJ, one would need to analyze aggregated contract data over several fiscal years, looking for keywords related to business intelligence, data analytics, reporting tools, and data warehousing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationNewspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory PublishersAll Other Publishers

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1543 FAIRMONT AVE, FAIRMONT, WV, 26554

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,283,194

Exercised Options: $3,756,516

Current Obligation: $3,756,516

Actual Outlays: $416,873

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15F06724A0000324

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-29

Current End Date: 2026-12-24

Potential End Date: 2029-12-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-04

More Contracts from Tygart Technology Inc

View all Tygart Technology Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending