DOJ awards $2.14M contract for residential care facilities, highlighting a need for specialized services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,141,000 ($2.1M)

Contractor: Kintock Group, Inc the

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FUNDING ONLY ACTION.

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19118

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $2.1 million to KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE for work described as: FUNDING ONLY ACTION. Key points: 1. Contract value of $2.14M for a 364-day period suggests a focus on essential, short-term support. 2. The 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code indicates a specialized service beyond standard housing. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust market for these services. 4. The contract is a Delivery Order under an existing contract, implying a pre-vetted vendor. 5. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overruns for the government. 6. The award to Kintock Group, Inc. positions them as a key provider in this niche sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.14M for a 364-day period appears reasonable for specialized residential care services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for correctional or transitional housing facilities would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is advantageous for cost control. Without specific performance metrics or detailed service breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award suggests a fair market price was likely achieved.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy market for these specialized residential care services.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of qualified providers, ensuring the government secures the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are individuals requiring residential care, likely within the Federal Prison System or Bureau of Prisons. Services delivered include the operation and management of 'Other Residential Care Facilities'. The contract is located in Pennsylvania (SN: PENNSYLVANIA), indicating a specific geographic focus for service delivery. This contract supports the government's correctional and rehabilitation mission by providing necessary housing and support services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality of care provided.
Limited detail on the exact nature of 'Other Residential Care Facilities' could mask potential risks.
The duration of 364 days, while standard, might not fully address long-term care needs if applicable.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Firm fixed-price contract type helps control costs for the government.
The contract is a Delivery Order, implying the contractor has a pre-existing relationship and proven capability.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Residential Care Facilities' sector encompasses a range of non-medical facilities providing housing and support services. This includes transitional housing, halfway houses, and other specialized residential settings. The federal government, particularly agencies like the Department of Justice, frequently contracts for such services to support correctional programs, re-entry initiatives, and other public safety objectives. Spending in this area is driven by the need for secure and rehabilitative environments outside of traditional correctional institutions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (SS: false, SB: false). While the primary awardee is Kintock Group, Inc., the implications for small business subcontracting are not detailed. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist and if small businesses are being leveraged for specialized services within this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice, specifically the Bureau of Prisons, given the agency and service type. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure and the delivery order mechanism, which implies performance expectations are tied to payment. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed operational oversight reports are not typically publicly disseminated.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons Operations
Correctional Facility Management
Re-entry Services Contracts
Residential Support Services

Risk Flags

Potential for undefined scope within 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code.
Need for clear performance metrics to ensure quality of care and service delivery.
Reliance on a single delivery order may indicate limited vendor pool for specific needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $2.1 million to KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE. FUNDING ONLY ACTION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Other Residential Care Facilities' by the Department of Justice?

Analyzing historical spending for 'Other Residential Care Facilities' by the Department of Justice (DOJ) reveals a consistent need for these services, particularly by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). While specific dollar amounts fluctuate year-to-year based on demand and program requirements, the DOJ has maintained a significant portfolio of contracts in this category. These contracts often support re-entry programs, halfway house operations, and transitional housing for individuals completing sentences. The trend generally shows a steady demand, with occasional increases during periods of heightened focus on criminal justice reform or capacity management within federal prisons. Benchmarking current awards against historical averages for similar service scopes and durations is crucial for assessing value for money and identifying potential cost escalations over time.

How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar residential care contracts?

Determining the precise per-unit cost for this contract is challenging without detailed breakdowns of services provided and the number of individuals served. The contract value of $2.14M over 364 days covers 'Other Residential Care Facilities,' which can encompass a wide range of services from basic housing to comprehensive support programs. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this contract's cost per diem or cost per resident against similar contracts awarded by the Bureau of Prisons or other federal agencies for comparable facilities and service levels in the same geographic region. Without such granular data, a direct per-unit cost comparison remains speculative. However, the full and open competition suggests that the pricing achieved is likely competitive within the market for these specialized services.

What is Kintock Group, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in residential care?

Kintock Group, Inc. has a notable track record with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons, often related to providing residential and support services. Their history includes managing facilities that serve diverse populations, including those transitioning from incarceration. Examining their past performance on similar contracts is essential to assess their reliability, quality of service delivery, and adherence to contractual obligations. A review of contract databases and performance evaluations would reveal the extent of their experience, the types of facilities they have managed, and any documented successes or challenges. This background provides context for the current award and helps gauge the risk associated with their ability to fulfill the contract requirements effectively.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically used to evaluate success in 'Other Residential Care Facilities' contracts?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for 'Other Residential Care Facilities' contracts typically focus on operational efficiency, resident well-being, and program effectiveness. Common KPIs include occupancy rates, resident retention rates, successful completion of program requirements, recidivism rates among former residents, incident reports (e.g., security breaches, resident altercations), staff-to-resident ratios, and timely submission of required reports to the contracting agency. For this specific contract, the Bureau of Prisons would likely emphasize metrics related to security, compliance with facility standards, and the successful reintegration of residents into society. The absence of publicly detailed KPIs for this particular award makes a direct assessment of expected performance difficult, but these are standard metrics in the industry.

Are there any specific risks associated with the 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code that warrant attention?

The 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code (623990) encompasses a broad category, which can introduce risks if the specific services are not clearly defined. Potential risks include variations in the level of care provided, challenges in ensuring consistent quality across different facilities or providers, and difficulties in monitoring compliance with specialized regulations. For government contracts, risks can also involve contractor performance issues, such as inadequate staffing, security lapses, or failure to meet rehabilitation program goals. Furthermore, the sensitive nature of housing individuals, particularly those with correctional backgrounds, necessitates robust oversight to mitigate risks related to safety, security, and ethical treatment. The specific nature of the population served and the facility's operational model are critical factors in risk assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Other Residential Care Facilities › Other Residential Care Facilities

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 580 VIRGINIA DR STE 250, FORT WASHINGTON, PA, 19034

Business Categories: Category Business, Community Development Corporation, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,141,000

Exercised Options: $2,141,000

Current Obligation: $2,141,000

Actual Outlays: $943,130

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BRRC24D00000039

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline