DOJ awards $3M contract for residential care services to Kintock Group, Inc. for one year

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,003,446 ($3.0M)

Contractor: Kintock Group, Inc the

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2024-10-01

End Date: 2025-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FUNDING ONLY ACTION.

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19134

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $3.0 million to KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE for work described as: FUNDING ONLY ACTION. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year term for residential care services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract duration of one year allows for periodic reassessment of needs and performance. 5. This award falls within the 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code, indicating specialized services. 6. The contractor, Kintock Group, Inc., has a history of federal contracts, suggesting some level of established performance. 7. Geographic focus on Pennsylvania is noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3 million for a one-year period for residential care services appears to be within a reasonable range, especially considering the specialized nature of such facilities. Benchmarking against similar contracts for correctional or residential support services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the ultimate value will depend on the quality and effectiveness of the services delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding process where multiple companies likely vied for the contract. The level of competition, while not explicitly detailed by the number of bidders, is generally expected to drive more competitive pricing and potentially better service offerings.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing services at the most competitive price, preventing potential overpayment that could arise from limited or sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are individuals requiring residential care services, likely within the Federal Prison System. The services delivered are expected to include housing, supervision, and support for residents. The geographic impact is concentrated in Pennsylvania, where the services will be provided. This contract supports jobs within the residential care and correctional support sector in Pennsylvania.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service quality variations given the fixed-price nature and the need for ongoing monitoring.
Dependence on Kintock Group, Inc. for critical residential care services requires robust performance management.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract type helps manage budget predictability.
Contract duration of one year allows for performance evaluation and potential adjustments.
Contractor has prior federal contract experience.

Sector Analysis

The Federal Prison System's need for residential care facilities falls within the broader 'Other Residential Care Facilities' sector, which encompasses establishments providing supervision and care for individuals. This sector is crucial for supporting government correctional and rehabilitation programs. Spending in this area is often driven by inmate populations and specific program requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve per-diem rates for similar facilities across different federal agencies or correctional systems.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, Kintock Group, Inc., is likely a larger entity capable of fulfilling the contract requirements independently.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Federal Prison System (Bureau of Prisons) within the Department of Justice. Accountability measures would include performance standards outlined in the contract, regular reporting requirements, and potential site inspections. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Operations
Correctional Facility Management
Residential Reentry Services
Inmate Support Services

Risk Flags

Performance Risk: Ensuring consistent quality of care and adherence to security protocols.
Contract Management Risk: Adequacy of government oversight to ensure contractor compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $3.0 million to KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE. FUNDING ONLY ACTION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KINTOCK GROUP, INC THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.

What is Kintock Group, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly for residential care services?

Kintock Group, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily from agencies like the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. Their awards often relate to providing residential services, including halfway house operations and detention services. Analyzing past contract performance, including any reported issues, contract modifications, or terminations, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in fulfilling the current award. Data from contract databases can reveal the volume and value of their previous federal work, offering insights into their experience level and capacity.

How does the awarded amount of $3,003,446 compare to similar residential care contracts awarded by the Federal Prison System or other agencies?

A direct comparison of the $3,003,446 award requires access to detailed data on similar contracts, including scope of services, duration, location, and number of individuals served. However, for a one-year contract for residential care, this amount suggests a significant operational scale. Benchmarking against per-diem rates or total contract values for facilities housing comparable populations would be necessary. Without specific comparable data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value, but it falls within the expected range for substantial correctional support services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential underperformance by the contractor in delivering quality residential care, leading to safety or security issues for residents. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen operational challenges, though the fixed-price nature itself mitigates government risk of escalating costs. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the Federal Prison System, clear service level agreements, regular reporting, and potentially site visits. The one-year duration also allows for reassessment if performance issues arise.

What is the expected effectiveness of the services provided under this contract in supporting the Federal Prison System's mission?

The effectiveness of these residential care services is crucial for the Federal Prison System's mission, particularly in facilitating inmate rehabilitation, reintegration into society, and reducing recidivism. High-quality residential care can provide a structured environment that supports educational programs, job training, and counseling. Conversely, substandard services could undermine these efforts and potentially lead to negative outcomes. The success will depend on the contractor's ability to meet performance standards and the alignment of the services with the specific needs of the inmate population being served.

What are the historical spending patterns for residential care facilities by the Department of Justice or the Federal Prison System?

Historical spending patterns for residential care facilities by the Department of Justice and the Federal Prison System have generally shown consistent investment in these services to manage inmate populations and support reentry programs. Spending levels can fluctuate based on inmate population trends, policy changes, and the availability of government-operated facilities. Analyzing past years' expenditures would reveal trends in contract values, the number of awards, and the primary contractors utilized. This context helps in understanding the scale and importance of this contract within the agency's overall budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Other Residential Care Facilities › Other Residential Care Facilities

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 580 VIRGINIA DR STE 250, FORT WASHINGTON, PA, 19034

Business Categories: Category Business, Community Development Corporation, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,003,446

Exercised Options: $3,003,446

Current Obligation: $3,003,446

Actual Outlays: $3,018,789

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BRRC24D00000039

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline