USDA's $83.6K MAXIMO MAS 9.1 Implementation contract awarded to Colossal Contracting LLC for 12,063 service hours

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $83,616 ($83.6K)

Contractor: Colossal Contracting LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-04-10

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 12063 / 1165056, TRM 200 MAXIMO MAS9.1 IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE HOURS, POP: 08 APR 2026

Place of Performance

Location: ANNAPOLIS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21401

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $83,615.71 to COLOSSAL CONTRACTING LLC for work described as: 12063 / 1165056, TRM 200 MAXIMO MAS9.1 IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE HOURS, POP: 08 APR 2026 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized IT implementation services. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a deliberate procurement strategy. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance period extends to April 2026, indicating a medium-term project. 5. The contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services', a broad IT category. 6. Limited raw data on specific deliverables makes in-depth value assessment challenging.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's fixed-price nature provides cost certainty. Benchmarking against similar MAXIMO implementation projects is difficult without more detailed scope information. However, the per-hour rate implied by the total award and service hours suggests a competitive market price for specialized IT services. The total value is relatively small, indicating a focused scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This indicates that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria, possibly related to specific capabilities or existing contracts. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive process was intended.

Taxpayer Impact: This procurement method aims to ensure fair pricing and access to the best value for taxpayers by allowing a broad range of qualified vendors to compete.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Delivers implementation services for the MAXIMO MAS 9.1 system. Likely impacts IT operations and asset management within APHIS. Workforce implications may include training and integration of new system functionalities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to gauge contractor effectiveness.
Potential for scope creep if implementation requirements are not tightly managed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical system implementation.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract reduces financial risk for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Clear end date for the contract provides project closure certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on enterprise asset management software implementation. The market for MAXIMO and similar platforms is competitive, with several specialized vendors offering implementation and support. The total spending on such services by federal agencies can range from millions to billions annually, depending on the scope and scale of IT modernization efforts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, potentially through subcontracting opportunities if Colossal Contracting LLC chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans, it's difficult to assess the direct benefit to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within APHIS, ensuring adherence to the contract terms and performance standards. Transparency is facilitated by the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which records contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

MAXIMO Software Implementation
IT Professional Services
Enterprise Asset Management Systems
Department of Agriculture IT Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for unclear scope definition
Limited performance data available
Unverified contractor experience in MAXIMO implementation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $83,615.71 to COLOSSAL CONTRACTING LLC. 12063 / 1165056, TRM 200 MAXIMO MAS9.1 IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE HOURS, POP: 08 APR 2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COLOSSAL CONTRACTING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $83,615.71.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-04-10.

What is the specific scope of work for the MAXIMO MAS 9.1 implementation?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'TRM 200 MAXIMO MAS9.1 IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE HOURS' with a total of 12,063 service hours. However, the specific modules or functionalities to be implemented, customization requirements, data migration strategies, and integration points with existing systems are not detailed in the summary data. A comprehensive understanding of the scope is crucial for assessing the value and risks associated with this contract. Further details would typically be found in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) attached to the contract.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar MAXIMO implementation services?

The total award is $83,615.71 for 12,063 service hours, implying an average blended hourly rate of approximately $6.93. This rate appears exceptionally low for professional IT implementation services, especially for a specialized system like MAXIMO. It is highly probable that the 'service hours' figure represents a specific component or a subset of the total effort, or that the 'award' amount is an estimate or a ceiling rather than the final obligated amount. Without clarification on what the 'service hours' and 'award' precisely represent in the context of the total contract value and scope, a meaningful comparison to market rates is not feasible. Typical rates for MAXIMO consultants can range from $100 to $300+ per hour depending on expertise and location.

What is the track record of Colossal Contracting LLC in delivering MAXIMO implementation services?

Information regarding Colossal Contracting LLC's specific track record with MAXIMO implementations is not available in the provided summary data. To assess their performance, one would need to review past performance evaluations, contract history, and client references related to similar projects. The 'co' field identifies the contractor, but without access to broader federal contract databases or specific performance reports, their expertise and reliability in this domain remain unverified by this data alone. A review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving complex IT systems, would be necessary.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks include scope creep, contractor underperformance, and integration challenges with existing APHIS systems. Mitigation strategies are suggested by the contract type: a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, which shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' also implies a selection process aimed at choosing a capable vendor. However, the limited scope of the provided data means specific risk mitigation plans detailed in the contract documents are unknown. Monitoring performance against the Statement of Work and ensuring clear communication channels are critical.

How does this contract fit into the broader IT modernization strategy of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)?

This contract for MAXIMO MAS 9.1 implementation likely supports APHIS's efforts to modernize its asset management capabilities. MAXIMO is an enterprise asset management (EAM) software used to manage physical assets, track maintenance, and optimize operations. Implementing or upgrading this system suggests APHIS is investing in better control over its infrastructure, equipment, and related maintenance activities. This aligns with common government IT modernization goals focused on efficiency, data-driven decision-making, and improved service delivery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 304 HARRY S TRUMAN PKWY STE G, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $83,616

Exercised Options: $83,616

Current Obligation: $83,616

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SD72B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline