Agriculture awards $5.5M HR Staffing contract to Your Recruiting Company, Inc. for 364 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,494,470 ($5.5M)

Contractor: Your Recruiting Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2027-04-07

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HR STAFFING AND RECRUITMENT

Place of Performance

Location: BELTSVILLE, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20705

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $5.5 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for work described as: HR STAFFING AND RECRUITMENT Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential HR staffing and recruitment services. 2. Awarded via BPA Call under full and open competition. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs. 4. Duration of 364 days indicates a short-term need. 5. Contract value is moderate for HR services. 6. Geographic focus on Maryland. 7. No small business set-aside noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $5.5 million for a one-year period for HR staffing and recruitment services appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for HR consulting services suggests that this award falls within a typical range for specialized recruitment needs. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the agency, which is a positive indicator of value. Without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., number of positions to be filled, complexity of roles), a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the overall price point seems aligned with market expectations for such services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all eligible vendors had the opportunity to bid. The fact that it was a BPA Call suggests it was likely competed among pre-qualified vendors on an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. With two bidders, the competition level was moderate, which generally allows for some price discovery and ensures a reasonable selection process. However, a higher number of bidders could potentially drive prices lower.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, even with two bidders, suggests that taxpayers benefited from a competitive process that likely resulted in a fair market price for the HR staffing services.

Public Impact

The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) will benefit from enhanced HR staffing and recruitment capabilities. Services are expected to support the agency's mission by ensuring adequate personnel are in place. The primary geographic impact is within Maryland, where the contractor is based. The contract will likely support the agency's workforce planning and talent acquisition efforts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition if the BPA itself was not widely competed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical HR functions for a year.
Scope creep could increase costs if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process (BPA Call).
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability.
Contractor is based in Maryland, potentially offering local expertise.
Clear end date for the contract.

Sector Analysis

The Human Resources Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541612) is a significant market within government contracting. Agencies frequently outsource recruitment and staffing needs to specialized firms to manage fluctuating workloads or access niche talent pools. This contract fits within the broader IT and Professional Services category, where agencies leverage external expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks for HR services vary widely based on scope, but a $5.5 million award for a year of comprehensive staffing support is within the expected range for a federal agency of the USDA's size.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award went to 'YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.', which may or may not be a small business itself. The lack of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited unless they are part of a larger subcontracting plan not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) contracting officer and program managers. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract simplifies financial oversight by establishing a set cost. Transparency is facilitated through the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), where contract awards are publicly reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

HR Staffing Services
Recruitment Services
Professional Services Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Department of Agriculture Contracts

Risk Flags

Moderate competition level (2 bidders).
Limited information on contractor past performance.
Potential for scope creep without strict management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $5.5 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.. HR STAFFING AND RECRUITMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Agricultural Research Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2027-04-07.

What is the specific scope of HR staffing and recruitment services required under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'HR STAFFING AND RECRUITMENT' under NAICS code 541612 (Human Resources Consulting Services). However, the specific details of the services are not elaborated. This typically includes tasks such as sourcing candidates, screening applications, conducting interviews, managing the hiring process, and potentially onboarding support. The Agricultural Research Service likely requires these services to fill critical vacancies, manage peak hiring periods, or access specialized skill sets not readily available internally. A more detailed statement of work (SOW) would be necessary to fully understand the scope, including the number and types of positions to be filled, performance metrics, and reporting requirements.

How does the $5.5 million contract value compare to similar HR staffing contracts awarded by the federal government?

The $5.5 million contract value for a 364-day duration for HR staffing and recruitment services is within a moderate range for federal contracts of this nature. Larger agencies or those with extensive hiring needs might award contracts in the tens or hundreds of millions. Smaller agencies or those with more targeted needs might award contracts in the hundreds of thousands. Given that this is for the Agricultural Research Service, a component of the USDA, the value appears proportionate to the agency's size and potential recruitment demands. Benchmarking against contracts with similar NAICS codes and durations would provide a more precise comparison, but the figure does not immediately suggest overpricing or underfunding without further context on service volume and complexity.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract for the Department of Agriculture?

Potential risks include the contractor's ability to deliver qualified candidates in a timely manner, especially for hard-to-fill positions. There's also a risk of scope creep if the agency's needs evolve beyond the initial agreement, potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed carefully, although the firm fixed-price structure mitigates this to some extent. Another risk is the contractor's performance not meeting expectations, impacting the agency's ability to maintain adequate staffing levels and operational efficiency. Finally, over-reliance on external recruiters could potentially diminish internal HR capacity or institutional knowledge over time.

What is the track record of 'YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.' in performing federal contracts?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of 'YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.' with federal contracts. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). These systems would provide details on past awards, performance ratings, and any past performance issues. Without this information, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and experience in fulfilling government requirements.

How does the competition level (2 bidders) impact the value received by the government?

A competition with two bidders represents a moderate level of competition. While it is better than a sole-source award, it may not be as advantageous for price discovery as a competition with a larger number of bidders. With only two offers, the government has limited options to compare, which could potentially lead to a higher price than if multiple firms were vying for the contract. However, if both bidders were highly qualified and competitive, the resulting price could still represent good value. The specific nature of the BPA and the pre-qualification process might also influence the number of bidders and the overall competitiveness.

What are the implications of the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award type for taxpayer dollars?

A 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award type is generally favorable for taxpayer dollars. It signifies that the government sought bids from all responsible sources capable of meeting the requirements, maximizing the pool of potential offerors. This broad competition typically drives down prices as companies vie for the contract, leading to a more cost-effective outcome. It also ensures that the government selects the best value solution available in the market. While this specific award had only two bidders, the initial intent and process of full and open competition aim to secure the best possible deal for taxpayers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Human Resources Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 1232SA26Q0333

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR STE 920, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,945,326

Exercised Options: $5,494,470

Current Obligation: $5,494,470

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 12805B23A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline