Commerce Department awards $16.2M contract for administrative management consulting services to Your Recruiting Company, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,241,216 ($16.2M)

Contractor: Your Recruiting Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2024-08-07

End Date: 2026-08-06

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: INITIATE A NEW TASK ORDER AGAINST THE ES BPA 1331L520A13ES0009 INCREMENTALLY FUND $2,000,000 TO THE CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $16.2 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for work described as: INITIATE A NEW TASK ORDER AGAINST THE ES BPA 1331L520A13ES0009 INCREMENTALLY FUND $2,000,000 TO THE CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. Services focus on administrative management and general management consulting, a common need across federal agencies. 3. The contract duration of 729 days suggests a medium-term engagement for specific project needs. 4. The award amount of $16.2 million represents a significant investment in external consulting expertise. 5. The contract is funded incrementally, with an initial task order of $2 million. 6. The contractor, Your Recruiting Company, Inc., is a new awardee for this specific type of service under this BPA.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $16.2 million for administrative management consulting over two years appears within a reasonable range for federal engagements of this nature. However, without specific details on the scope of work and deliverables, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar consulting contracts within the Department of Commerce or other agencies for comparable services would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing reflects competitive market rates for the expertise required. The incremental funding approach allows for flexibility but also necessitates ongoing scrutiny of spending against progress.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. As this is a BPA Call, the underlying BPA likely underwent a competitive process. The specific competition for this task order would depend on the terms of the BPA and whether it allowed for further competition among BPA holders or if it was a direct award under the BPA. The level of competition for the BPA itself is a key factor in ensuring fair pricing and access to a broad range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and a wider selection of qualified service providers, ultimately maximizing the value of federal spending.

Public Impact

The Department of Commerce benefits from specialized administrative and management consulting expertise to improve operational efficiency. Services delivered are expected to enhance general management practices within the agency. The primary geographic impact is likely within the Department of Commerce's headquarters and potentially other operational locations. The contract supports the administrative functions of the agency, indirectly impacting the workforce by potentially streamlining processes or providing strategic guidance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a significant sector within federal contracting, encompassing a wide range of advisory and assistance services. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to improve organizational efficiency, strategic planning, and operational effectiveness. Spending in this sector is driven by the need for specialized expertise that may not be available in-house. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the average contract values and durations for similar consulting services awarded to various federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false for this specific award. This suggests that the contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mandated in this task order. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on other awards or if the overall BPA has small business utilization goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Commerce's contracting officers and program managers responsible for the Office of the Secretary. The incremental funding mechanism allows for phased oversight, with reviews potentially occurring at each funding increment. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where award details are publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management, consulting-services, department-of-commerce, office-of-the-secretary, bpa-call, full-and-open-competition, labor-hours, maryland, mid-tier-contract, professional-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $16.2 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.. INITIATE A NEW TASK ORDER AGAINST THE ES BPA 1331L520A13ES0009 INCREMENTALLY FUND $2,000,000 TO THE CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (Office of the Secretary).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-07. End: 2026-08-06.

What is the specific scope of work for these administrative management and general management consulting services?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for this contract. It is categorized under NAICS code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' This broad category typically includes services such as strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, management studies, and general administrative support. To understand the precise deliverables, one would need to consult the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). The initial task order of $2,000,000 suggests a focused initial phase of work, with subsequent task orders potentially expanding the scope or continuing the engagement based on performance and evolving needs.

How does the $16.2 million award compare to typical spending on similar consulting services within the Department of Commerce?

Without access to a comprehensive database of all Department of Commerce consulting contracts, a direct comparison is difficult. However, $16.2 million over two years for administrative and management consulting is a substantial award. Federal agencies often spend significant amounts on such services to address complex organizational challenges, implement new strategies, or improve efficiency. To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze historical spending patterns for NAICS 541611 within the Department of Commerce, looking at average contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. This contract's value appears to be in the mid-to-high range for a single task order under a BPA, suggesting a significant project or ongoing support requirement.

What is the track record of Your Recruiting Company, Inc. in providing administrative management consulting services to the federal government?

The provided data identifies 'YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.' as the contractor. A thorough assessment of their track record would require examining their past federal contract awards, particularly those under NAICS code 541611 or similar management consulting categories. This would involve reviewing contract performance reports (if available), past performance evaluations, and any history of contract modifications or disputes. As this is an award against an existing BPA (ES BPA 1331L520A13ES0009), their inclusion on the BPA itself implies they met certain qualifications. However, the specific performance on this task order remains to be seen and will be evaluated over its duration.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Potential risks include scope creep, where the project's objectives expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns and delays. Another risk is the contractor's performance not meeting expectations, impacting the Department's operational goals. Furthermore, reliance on external consultants can sometimes lead to a knowledge transfer gap if not managed properly. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management, clearly defined deliverables and milestones, regular performance reviews, and strong communication channels between the government and the contractor. The incremental funding also serves as a risk mitigation tool, allowing the government to pause or re-evaluate the engagement at funding boundaries.

How does the use of a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) impact the competition and cost-effectiveness of this award?

Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) are established with vendors to streamline the procurement of supplies or services that are expected to be needed repeatedly. The initial establishment of a BPA typically involves a competitive process. For subsequent task orders issued against the BPA, the level of competition can vary. If the BPA allows for further competition among multiple BPA holders, it can maintain competitive pressure and potentially lead to better pricing for each task order. If it's a sole-source BPA or if task orders are issued without further competition, the cost-effectiveness relies heavily on the initial competitive pricing established for the BPA. In this case, the award is noted as 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' which likely refers to the initial BPA competition or the specific task order competition if applicable.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3975 FAIR RIDGE DR SUITE 300S, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,271,296

Exercised Options: $22,271,296

Current Obligation: $16,241,216

Actual Outlays: $11,760,048

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 15

Total Subaward Amount: $1,229,546

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1331L520A13ES0009

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-08-07

Current End Date: 2026-08-06

Potential End Date: 2026-08-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from Your Recruiting Company, Inc.

View all Your Recruiting Company, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending