Agriculture Department's $27.7M consulting contract awarded to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for administrative management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,693,639 ($27.7M)

Contractor: Your Recruiting Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2014-09-09

End Date: 2017-06-16

Contract Duration: 1,011 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20024

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $27.7 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of administrative management consulting services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration of over 3 years indicates a need for sustained support in administrative functions. 4. Performance context is administrative management, a broad category that requires adaptable consulting expertise. 5. This contract falls within the professional services sector, a common area for federal outsourcing. 6. The award was a delivery order, suggesting it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $27.7 million over roughly three years for administrative management consulting services seems within a reasonable range for federal contracts of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services awarded by agencies like the Department of Agriculture or other large federal bodies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The pricing structure, likely based on labor hours, needs to be evaluated against prevailing market rates for consultants with the required expertise to confirm if it represents good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The fact that it was competed openly suggests a robust market for administrative management and general management consulting services. The number of bidders is not specified, but open competition generally fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive rates to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through market forces, ensuring that the government receives services at competitive prices. It also promotes a wider pool of potential contractors, increasing the likelihood of finding the best value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the administrative departments within the Farm Service Agency, receiving support to improve operational efficiency. Services delivered include general management consulting, administrative support, and potentially process improvement initiatives. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the Farm Service Agency's administrative functions are likely concentrated. Workforce implications may involve the augmentation of existing federal staff with specialized consulting expertise, rather than direct replacement.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the administrative management needs are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on external consultants may reduce internal capacity building for administrative functions over the long term.
Ensuring the quality and relevance of consulting advice to the specific needs of the Farm Service Agency is crucial.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded fair pricing.
The contract duration indicates a recognized need for ongoing administrative support, suggesting a strategic approach.
The contractor, YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC., has secured a significant federal contract, implying a level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal contracting, with agencies frequently outsourcing specialized expertise to improve efficiency and address complex management challenges. The market size for such services is substantial, with numerous firms competing for government contracts. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large federal contracts for management consulting services across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically tied to small business set-asides for this particular award. The impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, primarily through any potential subcontracting opportunities that YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. might offer to small businesses as part of their overall service delivery, though this is not mandated by the contract terms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program officials within the Farm Service Agency. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance work statement and delivery schedules outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Management Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services
Professional Services Contracts
Department of Agriculture IT and Management Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds 3 years, requiring sustained oversight.
Scope of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' is broad and requires clear definition.
Potential for contractor performance issues over the extended period.
Need to ensure fair market value is achieved through competitive award.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $27.7 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Farm Service Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-09-09. End: 2017-06-16.

What is the track record of YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. in performing federal administrative management consulting contracts?

To assess the track record of YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC., a detailed review of their past federal contract performance would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, their values, durations, and agencies served. Performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be critical to understand their history of meeting deadlines, quality standards, and cost controls. A history of successful contract completions, positive performance reviews, and minimal disputes would indicate a strong track record. Conversely, a pattern of poor performance, contract terminations, or significant disputes would raise concerns about their capability to successfully execute this current $27.7 million contract.

How does the awarded value of $27.7 million compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts?

The awarded value of $27.7 million for administrative management consulting services over approximately three years needs to be benchmarked against comparable federal contracts. This involves identifying contracts with similar scopes of work (e.g., general management consulting, administrative process improvement, organizational efficiency) awarded by agencies of similar size and complexity, such as the Department of Agriculture or other large cabinet-level departments. Factors like the number of labor hours, types of expertise required (e.g., strategic planning, operational analysis, policy development), and the specific deliverables expected will influence cost. If this contract's value per labor hour or per year is significantly higher than similar, competitively awarded contracts, it could indicate potential overpricing or a less competitive outcome.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this administrative management consulting contract include potential misalignment between the contractor's proposed solutions and the agency's actual needs, leading to ineffective outcomes. Another risk is the contractor's ability to deliver consistent quality and expertise throughout the contract's duration, especially given the multi-year term. Performance degradation or an inability to adapt to evolving agency requirements could also pose a risk. Mitigation strategies typically involve a clearly defined Statement of Work (SOW), robust performance monitoring by the government, regular progress reviews, and performance-based payment structures. Ensuring strong government oversight and maintaining open communication channels with the contractor are crucial for proactive risk management.

How effective is the Farm Service Agency likely to be in overseeing this contract to ensure value for taxpayer money?

The effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency's oversight depends on several factors. Adequate funding and staffing for contract management personnel, including contracting officers' representatives (CORs), are essential. The agency's established processes for monitoring contractor performance, approving deliverables, and managing changes will play a significant role. A clear understanding of the contract's objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) by agency personnel is also critical. If the agency has a mature contract management system and dedicated resources, oversight is likely to be effective in ensuring value. Conversely, resource constraints or a lack of expertise in managing consulting services could diminish oversight effectiveness.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management consulting services within the Department of Agriculture?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting services within the Department of Agriculture (USDA) would reveal trends in demand, typical contract values, and the agencies or offices most frequently utilizing such services. This context helps determine if the $27.7 million awarded to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. is an outlier or consistent with past investments. Examining spending over the last 5-10 years can identify fluctuations, shifts in focus (e.g., towards digital transformation, efficiency drives), and the primary contractors that have historically secured these types of awards. Understanding this pattern provides a baseline for assessing the current contract's significance and potential future spending in this category.

What are the implications of awarding a delivery order versus a standalone contract for this service?

Awarding this as a delivery order implies it was issued under a pre-existing indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, likely competed previously on a broader scope. This approach can expedite the acquisition process for specific needs once the IDIQ is in place. For taxpayers, it suggests that the initial IDIQ competition likely established a baseline price structure. However, the specific value of this delivery order ($27.7M) still requires scrutiny to ensure it aligns with the terms of the IDIQ and represents fair market value for the defined services. The existence of an IDIQ suggests a strategic sourcing approach by the government for recurring needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3975 FAIR RIDGE DR SUITE 300S, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,693,639

Exercised Options: $27,693,639

Current Obligation: $27,693,639

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: AG3151C130024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline