Department of the Army awards $40.6M for Facilities Support Services to J & J Maintenance Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $40,594,589 ($40.6M)

Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-10-01

End Date: 2011-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,459 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Other

Official Description: HOUSEKEEPING AND FACILTIY O&M

Place of Performance

Location: TRAVIS AFB, SOLANO County, CALIFORNIA, 94535

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $40.6 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: HOUSEKEEPING AND FACILTIY O&M Key points: 1. Contract value of $40.6M over approximately 4 years indicates significant investment in facility upkeep. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust market for these services, potentially driving competitive pricing. 3. The contract's duration and scope present moderate performance and execution risks. 4. Facilities Support Services are critical for maintaining operational readiness and infrastructure integrity. 5. This award falls within the broader category of facility maintenance and management, a substantial segment of federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award of $40.6M over nearly 4 years averages to approximately $10.15M annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar facilities support contracts in California or for the Department of the Army, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the scale of the contract suggests a significant operational need. The pricing would need to be benchmarked against industry standards for janitorial, maintenance, and facility operations to determine if it represents good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. This method generally promotes a wider range of proposals and encourages competitive pricing. The presence of multiple bidders suggests a healthy market for facilities support services, which can lead to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the opportunity to secure the best possible price and quality through a broad bidding process, reducing the likelihood of overpayment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army personnel and operations at the facilities managed under this contract. Services delivered likely include janitorial, maintenance, repair, groundskeeping, and potentially other facility operational support. The geographic impact is concentrated in California, where the facilities are located. This contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector, potentially including local workforces in California.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services represent a significant portion of the government's operational spending, encompassing a wide range of activities necessary to maintain government buildings and infrastructure. This sector includes services like cleaning, maintenance, repair, pest control, and landscaping. The market is typically competitive, with numerous small, medium, and large businesses offering these services. Federal spending in this area is driven by the need to ensure safe, functional, and compliant facilities across various agencies and installations.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside, the prime contractor, J & J MAINTENANCE INC, may be a small business itself. Further analysis would be needed to confirm the contractor's size status. Regardless, large contracts like this often have subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, particularly in specialized areas of facility maintenance or support, contributing to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Army. Performance standards and service level agreements would be established to ensure accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support-services, department-of-the-army, california, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, facilities-maintenance, government-contracting, defense-spending, service-contract, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $40.6 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. HOUSEKEEPING AND FACILTIY O&M

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $40.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2011-09-29.

What is the track record of J & J MAINTENANCE INC with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess J & J MAINTENANCE INC's track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract modifications, disputes, or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar scope and value contracts, especially within the Department of Defense or for facilities support services, would provide insight into their capacity and reliability. A history of successful contract completion and positive performance reviews would indicate a lower risk profile for this current award.

How does the average annual cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts?

To benchmark the value, we would compare the average annual cost of approximately $10.15M ($40.6M / 4 years) against similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other federal agencies in California or comparable regions. Key comparison points would include the size and type of facilities supported, the scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, electrical, groundskeeping), and the contract duration. If comparable contracts for similar services and facility types are significantly lower or higher, it would indicate whether this award represents a potentially good or questionable value for the government.

What are the primary risks associated with a 4-year facilities support contract of this magnitude?

The primary risks associated with a 4-year, $40.6M facilities support contract include performance risk (ensuring the contractor consistently meets service level agreements and quality standards), financial risk (potential for cost overruns or contractor financial instability), and operational risk (disruptions to facility operations due to contractor issues). There's also a risk of vendor lock-in if the contractor's performance is adequate but not exceptional, making future competition more challenging. Effective contract management, clear performance metrics, and contingency planning are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the typical market size and competitive landscape for facilities support services?

The market for facilities support services is substantial and highly competitive, encompassing a wide range of services from basic janitorial to complex building systems maintenance. Federal spending in this sector is significant, driven by the vast inventory of government-owned and leased facilities. The landscape includes large, diversified facility management companies, as well as numerous small and medium-sized businesses specializing in specific services. Full and open competition, as seen in this award, is common, reflecting the availability of qualified vendors and the government's desire to leverage market competition for best value.

How has federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) trended over the past five years?

Federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) has generally remained robust, reflecting the ongoing need to maintain government infrastructure. While specific year-over-year fluctuations can occur due to budget cycles, agency priorities, and major infrastructure projects, the overall trend indicates consistent demand. Analyzing historical data from sources like FPDS or USAspending would reveal the total federal outlays for this category, showing whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained relatively stable. This trend provides context for the significance of individual contract awards like the one to J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DY03R0009

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Contractor Details

Address: 3755 S CAPITAL OF TEXAS H, AUSTIN, TX, 78704

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,594,589

Exercised Options: $40,594,589

Current Obligation: $40,594,589

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY04D0027

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-10-01

Current End Date: 2011-09-29

Potential End Date: 2011-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-26

More Contracts from J & J Maintenance Inc

View all J & J Maintenance Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending