J & J MAINTENANCE INC awarded $15.7M for facility operations and maintenance services by the Department of the Army

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,748,661 ($15.7M)

Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-30

End Date: 2010-09-23

Contract Duration: 1,454 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80913

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.7 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. The contract value of $15.7 million over approximately four years suggests a moderate annual spend for facility operations and maintenance. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract likely benefited from a competitive bidding process to ensure fair pricing. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, J & J MAINTENANCE INC. 4. The duration of 1454 days indicates a long-term need for these services by the Department of the Army. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to a standardized service offering within the facilities support sector. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, suggesting it is part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.7 million spread over roughly four years averages to approximately $3.9 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar facility operations and maintenance contracts in the Colorado region or for the Department of the Army, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor is responsible for managing costs to maintain profitability, which can be a positive indicator of cost control. Further analysis would require comparing this annual spend to similar contracts for facilities of comparable size and scope.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to drive down prices and improve the quality of services offered. The open competition suggests that the Department of the Army sought the best value through a broad solicitation process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of service options, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army personnel and operations at the facilities managed under this contract. The services delivered include essential facility operations and maintenance, ensuring the functionality and upkeep of government infrastructure. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Colorado, supporting federal operations within that state. The contract supports the workforce employed by J & J MAINTENANCE INC, contributing to local employment in Colorado.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or quality assurance details in the provided data.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise, despite the fixed-price nature.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations could pose a risk if performance degrades.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost management.
Long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need and potential for contractor expertise development.

Sector Analysis

Facility operations and maintenance is a significant sector within the broader facilities support services industry. This contract falls under the NAICS code 561210, which encompasses establishments primarily engaged in operating and maintaining buildings and other facilities, on a contract or fee basis. The market for these services is driven by government and private sector entities requiring specialized expertise in managing complex infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or per facility for similar government contracts.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The award to J & J MAINTENANCE INC, whose size is not specified, means that opportunities for small business participation would depend on the prime contractor's own subcontracting plans and policies, which are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance monitoring details are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Facilities Engineering Services
Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO)
Government Property Management

Risk Flags

Potential for quality degradation due to fixed-price structure.
Contractor performance risk over the contract duration.
Scope definition clarity for facility maintenance services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.7 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2010-09-23.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility operations and maintenance services by the Department of the Army in Colorado?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facility operations and maintenance by the Department of the Army in Colorado requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data beyond this single contract. While this contract awarded $15.7 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC, it represents only one instance. A thorough analysis would involve aggregating spending data for similar NAICS codes (e.g., 561210) and contract types within the specified geographic region and agency over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, the number of awards, and the primary contractors involved. Such a pattern analysis could identify periods of increased or decreased investment in facility maintenance, potential budget fluctuations, and the overall scale of the Army's commitment to facility upkeep in Colorado.

How does the awarded amount compare to industry benchmarks for similar facility operations and maintenance contracts?

Comparing the $15.7 million award to industry benchmarks for facility operations and maintenance requires detailed information about the scope, scale, and specific services included in the contract, as well as the size and type of facilities managed. Benchmarks often consider factors like cost per square foot, cost per building, or cost per service type (e.g., HVAC maintenance, janitorial services). Without these specifics, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests J & J MAINTENANCE INC is responsible for cost control. If this contract covers a large installation or multiple facilities, the total value might be within a reasonable range, but without comparative data on similar government contracts or private sector equivalents, assessing value for money remains preliminary.

What is J & J MAINTENANCE INC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in facility operations and maintenance?

To assess J & J MAINTENANCE INC's track record, one would need to examine their complete federal contract history. This includes the number of contracts awarded, their values, the agencies they served, and the types of services provided. Key performance indicators such as past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or terminations would be crucial. For facility operations and maintenance, it would be important to see if they have successfully managed contracts of similar size and complexity. A review of their history would reveal their experience level, reliability, and ability to meet federal requirements, providing insight into the likelihood of successful performance on this $15.7 million award.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for facility operations and maintenance?

While firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are designed to provide cost certainty and shift risk to the contractor, they can present specific challenges in facility operations and maintenance. A primary risk is that the contractor, J & J MAINTENANCE INC, might cut corners on essential maintenance or repairs to maximize profit, potentially leading to a decline in facility condition or premature equipment failure. Conversely, if the scope of work is not precisely defined or unforeseen issues arise (e.g., natural disasters, unexpected infrastructure failures), the contractor may incur significant losses, potentially leading to disputes or a desire to exit the contract. Effective oversight is crucial to ensure quality standards are maintained despite the FFP structure.

How does the competition level (full and open) typically influence pricing and service quality for facility support services?

Full and open competition generally fosters a more competitive environment, which tends to drive down prices as multiple bidders vie for the contract. This increased competition can also lead to higher service quality as contractors strive to differentiate themselves through performance and innovation. For facility support services, a broad solicitation allows the Department of the Army to potentially receive a wider range of technical approaches and pricing structures. The outcome of this $15.7 million award suggests that the competitive process was deemed sufficient to meet the government's needs, likely resulting in a fair market price and a satisfactory level of service quality from J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 3755 S CAPITAL OF TEXAS H, AUSTIN, TX, 78704

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,969,503

Exercised Options: $15,748,661

Current Obligation: $15,748,661

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY04D0027

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline