Naval Academy Building Modernization Contract Awarded to Forrester Construction for $17.76 Million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,760,133 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Forrester Construction Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-02-26

End Date: 2012-11-14

Contract Duration: 1,357 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: HUBBARD HALL RM 9-94 RESTORE AND MODERNIZE BUILDING 260 AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

Place of Performance

Location: ANNAPOLIS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21402

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: HUBBARD HALL RM 9-94 RESTORE AND MODERNIZE BUILDING 260 AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND Key points: 1. The contract for Hubbard Hall modernization at the US Naval Academy was awarded to Forrester Construction Company. 2. This project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 3. The award was made via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration was 1357 days, indicating a significant, multi-year project.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $17.76 million for a major building modernization project appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of qualified contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process likely ensured taxpayer funds were used efficiently for this significant infrastructure upgrade.

Public Impact

Modernization of a key facility at the prestigious US Naval Academy. Impacts training and living conditions for midshipmen and staff. Supports the construction industry and local employment in Maryland.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This project is within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar projects would typically consider factors like square footage, complexity of renovations, and location.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the project scope inherently excluded small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy, under the Department of Defense, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight mechanisms for construction projects would apply, including site inspections and progress reporting.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. HUBBARD HALL RM 9-94 RESTORE AND MODERNIZE BUILDING 260 AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-02-26. End: 2012-11-14.

What was the specific scope of work for the Hubbard Hall modernization, and how did it align with the final contract value?

The scope involved restoring and modernizing Building 260 at the US Naval Academy. While the contract value was $17.76 million, the precise details of the modernization (e.g., structural, electrical, HVAC, aesthetic upgrades) and how they precisely determined the final price are not detailed here. A breakdown of costs by work category would clarify value.

Were there any significant delays or cost overruns during the project's execution, and how were they managed?

The project duration was 1357 days (approx. 3.7 years), which is substantial. Without access to project management records, it's impossible to determine if there were delays or cost overruns beyond the initial contract. The fixed-price nature suggests the contractor bore the risk, but change orders could have impacted the final cost.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for the government in this specific contract?

Full and open competition is generally the most effective method for ensuring best value. The fact that multiple bids were likely received and evaluated suggests a competitive price was obtained. However, without knowing the number of bids or the price range, a definitive assessment of 'best value' is difficult.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N6247704R0012

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12231 PARKLAWN DR, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20852

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,760,133

Exercised Options: $17,760,133

Current Obligation: $17,760,133

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247704D0035

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-02-26

Current End Date: 2012-11-14

Potential End Date: 2012-11-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-08-05

More Contracts from Forrester Construction Company

View all Forrester Construction Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending