Forrester Construction awarded $54M contract for Harry S Truman Modernization Phase 1B, highlighting significant public building investment

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $54,017,685 ($54.0M)

Contractor: Forrester Construction Company

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2010-06-18

End Date: 2017-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,722 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 19

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20520

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $54.0 million to FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4 Key points: 1. The contract value represents a substantial investment in federal infrastructure modernization. 2. Competition dynamics for this large-scale construction project are crucial for ensuring taxpayer value. 3. Performance context will be key to understanding the effectiveness of this modernization effort. 4. The project's sector positioning is within the critical area of federal building construction and maintenance. 5. The duration of the contract suggests a complex, multi-year undertaking.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the $54 million contract value against similar large-scale federal building modernization projects is challenging without more granular cost breakdowns. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but the final expenditure will depend on the contractor's efficiency and any change orders. The awarded amount appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scope, but a detailed cost-per-square-foot analysis would provide better value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. With 19 bids received, the level of competition suggests a robust market response. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A high number of bidders in a full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through competitive pressures.

Public Impact

Federal employees and the public will benefit from modernized and potentially more efficient federal facilities. The services delivered include construction and modernization of a significant federal building. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, affecting federal operations there. The project implies a need for skilled construction labor, potentially impacting the local workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if project scope expands beyond initial fixed-price agreement.
Delays in construction could impact the operational readiness of the facility.
Ensuring quality of construction over a multi-year project requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process that could yield favorable pricing.
The large number of bids indicates market interest and potential for contractor capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain, upgrade, and modernize aging government infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal building projects, such as courthouse renovations or agency headquarters construction, to gauge cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor engages small businesses for specialized services or materials.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which places cost risk on the contractor. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed project progress reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Modernization Programs
Public Infrastructure Construction Contracts
General Services Administration Capital Investments

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep in multi-year construction projects.
Dependence on contractor's financial stability and performance.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $54.0 million to FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FORRESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $54.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-06-18. End: 2017-11-30.

What was the historical spending pattern for the Harry S Truman Building modernization prior to this award?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award for 'HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4' valued at $54,017,685. It does not offer historical spending data for the building's modernization efforts. To understand historical patterns, one would need to query federal procurement databases for previous contracts related to the Harry S Truman Building, looking at various phases, packages, and contract types awarded over time. This would reveal trends in investment, types of work performed, and the evolution of modernization strategies.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or initial budget for this phase of the modernization?

The provided data indicates an awarded amount of $54,017,685 for the 'HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4' contract. However, it does not include information about the initial budget, estimated cost, or the government's independent cost estimate for this project. Without this baseline, it's impossible to determine if the awarded amount was higher, lower, or in line with expectations. A comparison would require accessing pre-solicitation documents or budget justifications related to this specific contract action.

What specific construction activities are included in 'Phase 1B Bid Pkg 3 & 4'?

The data identifies the contract as 'HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PHASE 1B BID PKG 3 & 4' and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as 236220, which pertains to Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. While this indicates the general nature of the work, it does not specify the exact construction activities within this particular package. Detailed information on the scope of work, such as structural repairs, HVAC upgrades, electrical system modernization, interior renovations, or facade improvements, would typically be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS).

What is the track record of Forrester Construction Company on similar federal projects?

Forrester Construction Company was awarded this $54 million contract for the Harry S Truman Modernization. To assess their track record on similar federal projects, one would need to examine their past performance on contracts of comparable size, scope, and complexity, particularly those involving large-scale institutional or government building construction. This would involve searching federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for their previous awards, contract performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), and any history of disputes or contract modifications. A review of their portfolio would indicate their experience with federal agencies and adherence to project timelines and budgets.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this modernization contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for a large construction project like the Harry S Truman Modernization, KPIs would focus on adherence to schedule (e.g., meeting key milestones, overall completion date), budget management (e.g., staying within the firm-fixed-price, managing change orders), quality of work (e.g., compliance with building codes and specifications, defect rates), safety performance (e.g., incident rates), and potentially functional performance of upgraded systems (e.g., energy efficiency, system reliability). These KPIs would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work or Performance Work Statement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: GS-11P-10-MK-C-0004

Offers Received: 19

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12231 PARKLAWN DR, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20852

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $54,463,523

Exercised Options: $54,017,685

Current Obligation: $54,017,685

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline