EMCOR Government Services awarded $19.4M for Navy facilities support, highlighting a competitive contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,428,778 ($19.4M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-10-01

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $53.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RBOS BASE YEAR FUNDING

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: RBOS BASE YEAR FUNDING Key points: 1. The contract demonstrates a competitive award process for essential facilities support. 2. Fixed-price terms suggest a focus on cost certainty for the government. 3. The duration of the contract indicates a need for sustained service delivery. 4. The award to a single entity implies a focus on specialized capabilities. 5. Geographic concentration in Washington D.C. suggests localized operational needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The base year funding of $19.4 million for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of services typically required by the Department of the Navy. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities maintenance contracts for federal agencies suggests that this award falls within expected cost ranges. The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability, which is a positive indicator of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple capable vendors were allowed to bid. The presence of 8 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and encourages vendors to offer their most competitive terms and pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive award process as it is likely to have driven down the final price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from reliable facilities maintenance and operations. Services ensure the readiness and functionality of naval installations. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management sector in the Washington D.C. area. End users within the Navy receive essential support services for their daily operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, represent a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services including building operation and maintenance, cleaning, and groundskeeping. Federal spending in this area is consistently high due to the vast real estate portfolio managed by various agencies. Comparable contracts often involve multi-year durations and substantial funding, reflecting the ongoing need for facility upkeep.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and did not include a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific subcontracting goals or reporting, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though large prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized support roles.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight. As a firm-fixed-price contract, performance monitoring is key to ensuring compliance. The Department of Defense has established Inspector General offices that can investigate allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, allowing for public scrutiny of awarded amounts and terms.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, washington-dc, services, operations-and-maintenance, large-contract, defense-sector

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. RBOS BASE YEAR FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-10-01. End: 2011-09-30.

What is the track record of EMCOR Government Services with similar federal contracts?

EMCOR Government Services has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense and other agencies requiring facilities support. Their portfolio often includes large-scale operations and maintenance, energy efficiency projects, and base support services. Analyzing their past performance on similar firm-fixed-price contracts can provide insights into their reliability, cost control, and ability to meet stringent government requirements. Reviewing past performance evaluations and any documented disputes or contract terminations can offer a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and potential risks associated with this award.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Navy or other DoD components?

The $19.4 million base year funding for this facilities support contract with the Department of the Navy can be benchmarked against similar awards. Contracts for base operations support, facilities maintenance, and management services for naval installations or other DoD entities often range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over their full performance periods. Factors influencing cost include the size and complexity of the facilities, geographic location, specific services required (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing, janitorial), and contract duration. A comparison with contracts of similar scope and duration, adjusted for inflation and regional cost differences, would be necessary for a precise value assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support services?

The primary risk with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for facilities support services lies in the potential for scope creep or unforeseen circumstances that increase the contractor's costs beyond what was anticipated. While FFP offers cost certainty to the government, if the contractor underestimates the effort or encounters unexpected issues (e.g., aging infrastructure requiring more repairs than projected), they may incur losses or seek to reduce service quality to maintain profitability. Conversely, if the government's needs change significantly, modifications to the FFP contract can be complex and costly. Effective government oversight is crucial to manage these risks and ensure that the contracted services are delivered as intended within the agreed-upon price.

What is the typical duration and funding profile for large-scale facilities support contracts?

Large-scale facilities support contracts, especially those awarded by major federal agencies like the Department of Defense, often have durations of multiple years, typically ranging from 3 to 10 years, including option periods. The funding profile is usually incremental, with a base year and subsequent option years funded annually through appropriations. The total potential value of such contracts can reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. The initial award amount, like the $19.4 million base year here, represents only a portion of the contract's total potential value over its entire performance period.

How does the number of bidders in a full and open competition impact pricing and service quality?

A higher number of bidders in a full and open competition generally leads to more competitive pricing as vendors strive to offer the most attractive proposals to win the contract. This increased competition can drive down costs for the government. Furthermore, a larger pool of bidders can enhance service quality, as contractors are motivated to differentiate themselves through superior performance, innovation, and customer service to secure and retain the contract. The presence of 8 bidders in this case suggests a robust competitive environment, likely benefiting taxpayers through better value and potentially higher service standards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008009R0478

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,428,778

Exercised Options: $19,428,778

Current Obligation: $19,428,778

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008010D0464

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-10-01

Current End Date: 2011-09-30

Potential End Date: 2011-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-07-30

More Contracts from Emcor Government Services, Inc

View all Emcor Government Services, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending