EPA's $20.2M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Ecology and Environment Inc. in 2001

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,195,268 ($20.2M)

Contractor: Ecology and Environment Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2001-01-15

End Date: 2006-01-01

Contract Duration: 1,812 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: LANCASTER, ERIE County, NEW YORK, 14086

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $20.2 million to ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $20.2 million over 1812 days. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Potential risk associated with cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type. 4. Services fall under Facilities Support Services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded in 2001. Benchmarking pricing against similar contracts from that era is challenging due to data limitations. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing by allowing all eligible vendors to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality.

Public Impact

Ensures operational continuity for EPA facilities. Supports environmental protection mission through facility maintenance. Potential for long-term contractor relationship impacting future procurements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type can incentivize cost overruns.
Lack of small business participation noted.
Contract duration is significant, requiring ongoing performance evaluation.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Supports critical EPA operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government buildings and infrastructure. Spending in this sector is consistent across federal agencies to ensure facility functionality.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses did not participate in this contract, either as prime contractors or potentially as subcontractors. This could represent a missed opportunity for small business engagement in federal contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor meets performance standards and manages costs effectively under the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure. Regular performance reviews and financial audits are crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type.
No small business participation.
Long contract duration.
Potential for cost overruns.
Limited data on performance outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $20.2 million to ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-01-15. End: 2006-01-01.

What was the specific scope of facilities support services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 561210 for Facilities Support Services. This typically includes a range of services such as operation, maintenance, and repair of buildings and grounds. Specific details would require reviewing the contract's statement of work, which is not included in the provided data.

How effectively did the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure manage contractor costs and ensure value for money?

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts can be challenging for value realization as they may incentivize higher costs to increase the fixed fee, though the fee itself is fixed. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and performance metrics are essential to mitigate risks and ensure the EPA received good value. Without performance data, it's difficult to definitively assess effectiveness.

What was the impact of awarding this contract to a single entity for an extended period on competition and innovation?

Awarding a contract for 1812 days (nearly 5 years) to a single entity, even under full and open competition initially, can limit opportunities for other firms to compete and introduce new solutions. While it provides stability, it necessitates robust performance management to ensure continued service quality and prevent complacency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Contractor Details

Address: 368 PLEASANT VIEW DR, LANCASTER, NY, 23

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,142,496

Exercised Options: $5,142,496

Current Obligation: $20,195,268

Timeline