DoD awards $29.3M facilities support contract to Centerra Integrated Facilities Services for USAG Stuttgart in CY2025

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,256,827 ($29.3M)

Contractor: Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-01-01

End Date: 2025-12-15

Contract Duration: 348 days

Daily Burn Rate: $84.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: OVERARCHING USAG STUTTGART BASOPS SERVICES CY2025

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.3 million to CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC for work described as: OVERARCHING USAG STUTTGART BASOPS SERVICES CY2025 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call, indicating potential for streamlined procurement. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process. 3. Contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 4. The duration of 348 days is standard for an annual service contract. 5. The award amount represents a significant investment in base operations support. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, suggesting large business prime contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $29.3 million for a one-year period of performance for facilities support services at USAG Stuttgart appears to be within a reasonable range for large military installations. Benchmarking against similar large-scale base operations support contracts would provide a more definitive assessment of value for money. The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates close monitoring to ensure costs do not escalate beyond initial expectations and to confirm that the contractor is providing efficient services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a healthy level of competition was sought.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging innovation from a wider pool of potential contractors.

Public Impact

Service members and their families stationed at USAG Stuttgart will benefit from maintained facilities and infrastructure. Essential services such as facility maintenance, repair, and potentially custodial services will be delivered. The geographic impact is concentrated at USAG Stuttgart, Germany. The contract supports a workforce of personnel required to perform the facilities management tasks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs in the provided data makes assessing service quality difficult.
Geographic location in Germany may introduce logistical and oversight complexities.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Contractor has experience in integrated facilities services, implying capability.
BPA Call award mechanism can indicate pre-negotiated favorable terms.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract is for base operations support, a critical component of maintaining military installations. The market for such services is substantial, with numerous large and small businesses capable of providing comprehensive facility management. Spending benchmarks for similar contracts vary widely based on installation size, location, and scope of services, but annual contracts often range from millions to tens of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor is likely a large business given the scope and value. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this detail, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to meet subcontracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the requiring activity at USAG Stuttgart. Performance monitoring, invoicing review, and compliance checks are standard accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like SAM.gov. Inspector General jurisdiction may be involved if specific allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Services
Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Logistics and Support Services
Defense Infrastructure Management

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type requires diligent oversight to control costs.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data hinders immediate assessment of service quality.
Potential for cost escalation due to unforeseen facility issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.3 million to CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC. OVERARCHING USAG STUTTGART BASOPS SERVICES CY2025

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-01. End: 2025-12-15.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at USAG Stuttgart?

Historical spending data for facilities support services at USAG Stuttgart is crucial for contextualizing the current $29.3 million award. Analyzing previous years' contract values, including any fluctuations or trends, can reveal whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable investment. It also helps in identifying if the same contractor or competitors have consistently won these awards. Understanding past spending can highlight potential cost efficiencies achieved or areas where costs have escalated, providing a baseline for evaluating the current contract's value for money and identifying any anomalies that warrant further investigation into contractor performance or market dynamics.

How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to similar contracts at other Army installations in Europe?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost of services against similar contracts at other Army installations in Europe is essential for assessing value for money. Without specific unit metrics (e.g., cost per square foot maintained, cost per service call), a direct comparison is challenging. However, if data on the scope of services provided (e.g., total square footage, types of maintenance) can be obtained, it could be compared to publicly available data for comparable installations. Significant deviations from the norm, either higher or lower, would prompt further inquiry into the specific service mix, local labor costs, and the efficiency of the contractor's operations. This analysis helps determine if USAG Stuttgart is receiving competitive pricing for its facilities support.

What is Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC's track record with similar DoD contracts?

Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC's track record with similar DoD contracts is a key indicator of their capability and reliability. A review of their past performance, particularly on large-scale base operations or facilities management contracts, would reveal their history of meeting performance requirements, managing costs, and adhering to schedules. Information on contract awards, modifications, and any past performance issues or disputes would provide insight into their operational effectiveness. Assessing their experience with international installations, if applicable, would also be relevant given the contract's location in Germany. A strong performance history suggests a lower risk for this contract, while a history of issues might indicate potential challenges.

What are the specific performance metrics and KPIs used to evaluate contractor performance on this contract?

The specific performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate contractor performance are critical for ensuring accountability and service quality. While not detailed in the provided data, typical KPIs for facilities support contracts include response times for service requests, completion rates for preventative maintenance, energy efficiency targets, and customer satisfaction scores. The contract's Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) would outline these metrics and the methods for surveillance. A robust set of measurable KPIs, tied to contractor payment and incentives, provides a clear framework for assessing whether the contractor is delivering the required services effectively and efficiently, thereby safeguarding taxpayer investment.

What is the potential risk associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this scope of services?

The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type carries inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. This structure can lead to cost overruns if the scope of work expands unexpectedly or if labor hours are not efficiently managed. For facilities support services, where unforeseen issues can arise, the risk is that the contractor may incur higher-than-anticipated labor and material costs. Effective government oversight, including detailed monitoring of labor hours, material costs, and the necessity of work performed, is crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives fair value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13530 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DR SUITE 500,, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,256,827

Exercised Options: $29,256,827

Current Obligation: $29,256,827

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91WFU21A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline