GSA's $13.1M Facilities Services Contract Awarded to Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,105,124 ($13.1M)

Contractor: Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-10-01

End Date: 2013-03-13

Contract Duration: 2,720 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE REDETERMINATION

Sector: Other

Official Description: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: KANSAS CITY, JACKSON County, MISSOURI, 64131

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13.1 million to CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC for work described as: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.1 million over its period of performance. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad bidder pool. 3. Contract type is Fixed Price Redetermination, allowing for price adjustments. 4. Services provided fall under 'Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings'. 5. The contract duration was approximately 2720 days. 6. The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $13.1 million over its extended period suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar facilities maintenance contracts would be necessary to determine if the pricing was competitive. The Fixed Price Redetermination contract type implies potential for price fluctuations, which warrants scrutiny to ensure costs remained reasonable.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors were invited to bid. The presence of 7 bidders indicates a healthy level of interest and competition for this type of service. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and potentially leads to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award, as multiple companies vied to win the contract.

Public Impact

Federal buildings managed by the General Services Administration benefit from these operations and maintenance services. Ensures the functionality and upkeep of government facilities, supporting the continuity of government operations. The services contribute to maintaining a safe and operational environment for federal employees and visitors. Geographic impact is concentrated in Missouri, where the contract was performed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Fixed Price Redetermination contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Lack of detailed performance data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's effectiveness and efficiency.
The long duration of the contract (over 7 years) may have allowed for price creep without sufficient justification.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
The contract was performed by Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC, indicating established operational capabilities.
The contract falls under a standard service category (NAICS 561790), suggesting a predictable service requirement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the facilities management and building services sector, a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector includes a wide range of services from janitorial to complex building operations. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies to maintain their real estate portfolios. Comparable contracts often involve similar service scopes and values, depending on the size and complexity of the facilities managed.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and there is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited for this specific award. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors, the details of which are not provided.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the GSA's Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms of the Fixed Price Redetermination contract, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance and cost justification data may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Operations and Maintenance
Government Facilities Management Services
General Services Administration Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Fixed Price Redetermination contract type.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Long contract duration may obscure cost efficiency over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13.1 million to CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CENTERRA INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2013-03-13.

What was the specific justification for the Fixed Price Redetermination contract type, and how were price adjustments managed?

The Fixed Price Redetermination (FPR) contract type is typically used when the costs of contract performance are not well-defined at the outset, often due to uncertainties in labor, material, or overhead costs. For this GSA contract, the FPR likely allowed for adjustments to the price based on actual costs incurred, subject to negotiation and agreement between the government and Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC. The government would have established criteria and ceilings for these redeterminations to control costs. Detailed justification for choosing FPR over other contract types, and the specific mechanisms for price redetermination (e.g., frequency, cost elements considered, profit/fee adjustments), would be found in the contract's negotiation file and award documentation. Without access to these internal documents, it's difficult to provide precise details on how price adjustments were managed and justified throughout the contract's life.

How did the actual final contract value compare to the initial estimated value, if available?

The provided data indicates a total award amount of $13,105,123.62. However, this figure represents the final obligated amount or total value over the contract's life, not necessarily an initial estimated value. Fixed Price Redetermination contracts, by their nature, allow for price adjustments during performance. To compare initial estimates with the final value, one would need access to the contract's baseline cost estimates or initial target prices established at the time of award. This information is typically found within the contract's negotiation and modification history, which is not publicly detailed in the provided summary data. Therefore, a direct comparison between an initial estimate and the final value cannot be made with the current information.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and did the contractor meet them?

The provided data summary does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance evaluation results for this contract. For facilities operations and maintenance contracts, typical KPIs might include response times for service requests, building system uptime, energy efficiency targets, cleanliness standards, and safety compliance. The effectiveness of Centerra Integrated Facilities Services, LLC in meeting these would have been assessed by the GSA's Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) throughout the contract period. Performance evaluations are often documented in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) records, which are not detailed here. Without access to CPARS or specific contract clauses outlining KPIs, it is impossible to determine if the contractor met performance expectations.

What is the typical annual spending for similar facilities maintenance contracts managed by the GSA?

Annual spending for GSA facilities maintenance contracts can vary significantly based on the size, type, and location of the buildings managed. For large federal complexes or multiple buildings, annual spending could range from several hundred thousand dollars to tens of millions. This contract's total value of approximately $13.1 million over roughly 7.5 years equates to an average annual spend of about $1.75 million. This figure falls within a moderate range for comprehensive facilities operations and maintenance services, particularly for a portfolio of significant federal properties. Benchmarking against other GSA contracts for similar building types and service scopes would provide a more precise comparison.

How does the number of bidders (7) compare to the average number of bidders for GSA facilities services contracts?

Receiving 7 bids for a facilities services contract under full and open competition is generally considered a healthy level of competition. The average number of bidders can fluctuate based on market conditions, the perceived value and complexity of the contract, and the specific industry segment. For large, complex service contracts, 7 bidders often indicates significant interest from the market. In some highly specialized or niche service areas, the number of bidders might be lower, while for more commoditized services, it could potentially be higher. This number suggests that GSA successfully attracted a reasonable pool of qualified vendors, which is positive for achieving competitive pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE REDETERMINATION (A)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12250 EL CAMINO REAL STE 300, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,105,124

Exercised Options: $13,105,124

Current Obligation: $13,105,124

Timeline