PCL Construction Services awarded $29.8M contract for Army Aviation Support Facility in New Mexico

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,843,399 ($29.8M)

Contractor: PCL Construction Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-07-27

End Date: 2012-09-30

Contract Duration: 796 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 18

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY, NEW MEXICO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, SANTA FE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, SANTA FE COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

Place of Performance

Location: SANTA FE, SANTA FE County, NEW MEXICO, 87501

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.8 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. for work described as: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY, NEW MEXICO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, SANTA FE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, SANTA FE COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Key points: 1. Contract value of $29.8M for construction services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Firm-fixed-price contract type suggests defined scope and cost. 4. Project duration of 796 days. 5. Located in Santa Fe, New Mexico. 6. Contract awarded by the Department of the Army. 7. No small business set-aside indicated.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $29.8 million for an aviation support facility appears reasonable given the scope of commercial and institutional building construction. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects for military aviation infrastructure would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type generally offers cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope was well-defined at the time of award.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 18 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this project. A competitive bidding process typically leads to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this construction project likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome for taxpayers, as contractors vied to offer the best value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the New Mexico Army National Guard, who will receive a new aviation support facility. The project delivers construction services for a critical military infrastructure asset. The geographic impact is localized to Santa Fe County, New Mexico. The construction workforce in the Santa Fe area will likely see employment opportunities during the project's duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise.
Delays in project completion could impact operational readiness of the aviation unit.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost control.
Full and open competition suggests competitive pricing.
Experienced contractor, PCL Construction Services, Inc., likely brings expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for military infrastructure. The construction market for such facilities is driven by government defense spending and the need for specialized operational spaces. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other aviation support facility constructions or large-scale military building projects within the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary contract was awarded to a large business, and the impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether PCL Construction Services, Inc. utilizes small business subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and project management personnel within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified construction services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Army National Guard Facilities
Aviation Infrastructure
Department of Defense Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for construction delays
Risk of cost overruns if scope changes
Ensuring specialized aviation infrastructure meets operational needs

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.8 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.. ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY, NEW MEXICO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, SANTA FE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, SANTA FE COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-07-27. End: 2012-09-30.

What is the track record of PCL Construction Services, Inc. with similar Department of Defense projects?

PCL Construction Services, Inc. is a large, well-established construction firm with a significant history of undertaking complex projects, including those for the Department of Defense. While specific details on past aviation support facilities are not provided here, their portfolio often includes military barracks, training facilities, and other institutional buildings. A review of their contract history with the DoD would reveal their experience in delivering projects on time and within budget, as well as any past performance issues or commendations. Their size and experience suggest a capacity to manage large-scale government contracts effectively, but a deeper dive into their specific DoD project history is recommended for a comprehensive assessment.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this project?

The provided data indicates an awarded amount of $29,843,399. Without access to the original estimated cost or budget set by the Department of the Army for this Aviation Support Facility, a direct comparison is not possible. However, the fact that the contract was awarded under full and open competition with 18 bids suggests that the awarded price was competitive. If the awarded amount was significantly below the initial estimate, it could indicate efficient bidding or potentially an underestimated scope. Conversely, if it was close to or exceeded the estimate, it might suggest a more accurate initial assessment or a highly sought-after project. Further analysis would require access to the government's pre-solicitation cost estimates.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract?

Key performance indicators for a construction contract like this typically revolve around schedule adherence, quality of work, safety compliance, and adherence to the contract specifications. For the Army Aviation Support Facility, KPIs would likely include meeting construction milestones, achieving specified building standards (e.g., structural integrity, environmental controls), maintaining a low incident rate for workplace safety, and ensuring all systems (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, specialized aviation support systems) function as intended. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract emphasizes timely completion and adherence to the defined scope as critical performance metrics.

What is the potential impact of the project duration (796 days) on the Army National Guard's operations?

A project duration of 796 days, approximately 2.2 years, for an Army Aviation Support Facility signifies a substantial construction timeline. The primary impact on the Army National Guard's operations would be the potential disruption or relocation of aviation units and support personnel during the construction period. This could necessitate temporary housing or alternative facilities, potentially incurring additional costs or logistical challenges. Furthermore, the delay in occupying the new, presumably upgraded, facility could postpone anticipated improvements in operational efficiency, maintenance capabilities, or training readiness that the new facility is intended to provide. Effective transition planning and interim operational strategies would be crucial to mitigate these impacts.

Are there any specific risks associated with building aviation support facilities compared to other types of institutional construction?

Yes, building aviation support facilities presents unique risks compared to standard institutional construction. These risks often include the need for specialized infrastructure such as reinforced flooring, high-bay doors, specialized ventilation for fuel and exhaust, and potentially hazardous material handling protocols (e.g., fuels, hydraulic fluids). The integration of complex aircraft maintenance equipment and systems requires precise installation and adherence to stringent safety and operational standards. Furthermore, proximity to active airfields introduces aviation safety risks during construction. The structural requirements to support heavy aircraft and specialized maintenance equipment can also add complexity and cost, increasing the potential for unforeseen issues during the build.

What is the historical spending trend for similar aviation support facilities by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending trends for similar aviation support facilities by the Department of the Army would likely show a pattern of significant investment in infrastructure to support aviation readiness. These projects are often large-scale and costly due to the specialized nature of the facilities required for aircraft maintenance, storage, and operations. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on modernization needs, unit deployments, and overall defense budget allocations. Analyzing past contracts for similar facilities would reveal average project costs, typical durations, and the prevalence of different contract types (e.g., fixed-price vs. cost-plus). This data would help contextualize the $29.8 million award for the New Mexico facility within broader Army infrastructure investment strategies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912PP10R0014

Offers Received: 18

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: PCL U.S. Holdings Inc (UEI: 245222591)

Address: 2000 S COLORADO BLVD #2-500, DENVER, CO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,843,399

Exercised Options: $29,843,399

Current Obligation: $29,843,399

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline