GSA Awards $38M Contract to PCL Construction for Cape Girardeau Courthouse Construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,064,721 ($38.1M)

Contractor: PCL Construction Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-03-17

End Date: 2005-12-31

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: GS06P02GZC0518 - PCL CONSTRUCTION CAPE GIRARDEAU,U.S. COURTHOUSE

Place of Performance

Location: CAPE GIRARDEAU, CAPE GIRARDEAU County, MISSOURI, 63703

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $38.1 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. for work described as: GS06P02GZC0518 - PCL CONSTRUCTION CAPE GIRARDEAU,U.S. COURTHOUSE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to PCL Construction Services, Inc. for $38,064,721. 2. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market participation. 4. The project aims to construct a U.S. Courthouse in Cape Girardeau, Missouri.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $38 million for a federal courthouse construction project appears within a reasonable range for such a significant undertaking. However, without specific project scope details and comparable project costs, a precise valuation is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The 'Full and Open Competition' method indicates that multiple bidders were likely considered, which generally promotes competitive pricing. The final price reflects the outcome of this competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this federal infrastructure project, with the expectation of value derived from the completed courthouse facility.

Public Impact

Construction of a new federal courthouse will enhance judicial services in the Cape Girardeau region. The project creates construction jobs and stimulates local economic activity. Federal building projects are subject to various regulations and standards, ensuring quality and safety.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for public buildings, involves significant capital investment and adherence to stringent federal standards. Benchmarks for courthouse construction vary widely based on size, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

While PCL Construction Services, Inc. is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal building projects. Oversight would typically involve monitoring construction progress, quality, and adherence to contract terms.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, mo, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $38.1 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.. GS06P02GZC0518 - PCL CONSTRUCTION CAPE GIRARDEAU,U.S. COURTHOUSE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-17. End: 2005-12-31.

What specific features and square footage are included in the $38 million courthouse construction budget?

The provided data does not detail the specific features or square footage of the Cape Girardeau U.S. Courthouse. A comprehensive cost breakdown would be necessary to understand how the $38 million budget is allocated across different aspects of the construction, such as building size, materials, specialized security features, and interior finishing.

What were the key factors that led to PCL Construction being selected over other bidders in the full and open competition?

While the contract was awarded through full and open competition, the specific evaluation criteria and the winning proposal's strengths are not detailed. Typically, selection is based on a combination of factors including technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price. PCL's bid likely offered the best overall value according to the GSA's evaluation framework.

How does the cost per square foot for this courthouse compare to similar federal construction projects?

Without the square footage of the courthouse and detailed cost breakdowns, a per-square-foot cost comparison is not possible. Benchmarking would require access to project specifications and cost data from other federal courthouse construction projects of similar scale and complexity.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: PCL U.S. Holdings Inc (UEI: 245222591)

Address: 2000 S COLO BLVD # 2-500, DENVER, CO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,064,721

Exercised Options: $38,064,721

Current Obligation: $38,064,721

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-03-17

Current End Date: 2005-12-31

Potential End Date: 2005-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-02-25

More Contracts from PCL Construction Services, Inc.

View all PCL Construction Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending