Army's Herbert Hoover Dike Project Costs $37M for Structure Replacements

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,955,088 ($37.0M)

Contractor: Harry Pepper & Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-09-27

End Date: 2019-01-08

Contract Duration: 1,929 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION - STRUCTURE REPLACEMENTS S-268 (C-8)&S-272 (C-13)

Place of Performance

Location: OKEECHOBEE, OKEECHOBEE County, FLORIDA, 34974

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.0 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION - STRUCTURE REPLACEMENTS S-268 (C-8)&S-272 (C-13) Key points: 1. The project involved significant structural replacements for the Herbert Hoover Dike. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract was awarded to Harry Pepper & Associates Inc. 4. The sector is Construction, specifically heavy and civil engineering.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $36.96 million for structure replacements appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale civil engineering projects would be necessary to definitively assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was utilized, which typically promotes competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of contractors to bid. This method is generally favorable for achieving fair market prices.

Taxpayer Impact: The $36.96 million expenditure represents taxpayer investment in critical infrastructure, aiming for long-term flood control and safety benefits.

Public Impact

Enhances flood control and public safety around Lake Okeechobee. Supports regional water management and environmental stability. Represents a significant federal investment in aging infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which often involves large-scale, complex projects. Spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on project scope and location.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the prime contractor is likely a large firm, and opportunities for small businesses may have been limited or not pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve project management and quality assurance to ensure adherence to contract terms and specifications.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.0 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION - STRUCTURE REPLACEMENTS S-268 (C-8)&S-272 (C-13)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-27. End: 2019-01-08.

What was the primary driver for the extensive duration of this contract?

The exceptionally long contract duration of 1929 days (over 5 years) for structure replacements suggests a phased approach to rehabilitation, potentially due to the scale of the dike, logistical challenges, or funding schedules. Further investigation into the project's phased execution and specific construction milestones would clarify the rationale behind this extended timeline.

Does the lack of small business participation indicate a lack of opportunity or a strategic choice?

The absence of small business participation (sb: false) could stem from several factors. The specialized nature of the work might favor large, experienced firms, or subcontracting opportunities may not have been effectively utilized. It warrants further review to determine if outreach efforts were sufficient or if the project scope inherently limited small business involvement.

How does the final cost compare to initial estimates for these structure replacements?

The provided data does not include initial cost estimates, making a direct comparison impossible. To assess the value and effectiveness of this contract, it would be crucial to obtain original cost projections and analyze any variances. Understanding cost overruns or savings would provide insight into the accuracy of initial planning and execution efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912EP13R0027

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 9000 REGENCY SQUARE BLVD FL 1, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32211

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $36,955,088

Exercised Options: $36,955,088

Current Obligation: $36,955,088

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-09-27

Current End Date: 2019-01-08

Potential End Date: 2019-01-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-25

More Contracts from Harry Pepper & Associates Inc

View all Harry Pepper & Associates Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending