Army Awards $13.1M Construction Contract to Harry Pepper & Associates for Conservation Facilities
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,107,489 ($13.1M)
Contractor: Harry Pepper & Associates Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-05-19
End Date: 2009-12-30
Contract Duration: 1,321 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200608!600816!96CE!W912EP!USA ENGINEER DIST JACKSONVILLE !W912EP06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060519!20080301!009821422!009821422!009821422!N!HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC !215 CENTURY 21 DR !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32216!45000!025!12!MIAMI !DADE !FLORIDA !+000000500000!N!N!000009748475!Y219!OTHER CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!002!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE County, FLORIDA, 33101
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.1 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: 200608!600816!96CE!W912EP!USA ENGINEER DIST JACKSONVILLE !W912EP06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060519!20080301!009821422!009821422!009821422!N!HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC !215 CENTURY 21 DR !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32216!45000!025!12!MIAMI !DADE… Key points: 1. The contract value of $13.1 million is significant for this type of construction. 2. Harry Pepper & Associates Inc. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' category suggests a specialized construction need. 4. The contract duration of over 3 years indicates a substantial project scope.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.1 million for 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' is difficult to benchmark without more specific project details. However, for a definitive contract of this size, it appears within a reasonable range for specialized construction.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting multiple bids were solicited. However, only one awardee is listed, which might indicate a highly specialized requirement or a limited number of qualified bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive process, even if resulting in a single awardee, aims to secure fair pricing for taxpayers. The final price of $13.1 million reflects the outcome of this process.
Public Impact
This contract supports infrastructure development in conservation, potentially impacting environmental projects. The award to a Florida-based company may provide local economic benefits. The project's duration suggests a long-term investment in federal facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited visibility into the specific nature of the 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities'.
- Potential for cost overruns given the long duration and specialized nature of the work.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract is for a firm fixed price, providing cost certainty.
- Project supports conservation efforts.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Construction sector, specifically 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction'. Federal spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, environmental projects, and facility maintenance. Benchmarks vary widely based on project type and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. There is no specific information provided on set-aside goals or the extent of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating oversight from a major federal agency. The definitive contract type suggests a structured procurement process, but further details on performance monitoring and accountability would be needed for a full assessment.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific project details for 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities'.
- Single awardee despite 'full and open competition' designation.
- No indication of small business subcontracting.
- Long contract duration increases potential for unforeseen costs.
- Contract awarded in 2006, with an end date in 2009, suggesting the project is complete but historical data may lack current relevance.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.1 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC. 200608!600816!96CE!W912EP!USA ENGINEER DIST JACKSONVILLE !W912EP06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060519!20080301!009821422!009821422!009821422!N!HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC !215 CENTURY 21 DR !JACKSONVILLE !FL!32216!45000!025!12!MIAMI !DADE !FLORIDA !+000000500000!N!N!000009748475!Y219!OTHER CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-05-19. End: 2009-12-30.
What specific conservation or development activities does 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' entail, and how does this impact the project's value?
The term 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' is broad and likely encompasses a range of specialized infrastructure related to environmental protection, resource management, or land development. Without specific details, it's hard to pinpoint the exact activities. However, such facilities can include things like water treatment plants, research stations, or specialized land management structures. The value of $13.1 million suggests a project of considerable scale and complexity within this specialized domain.
Given the 'full and open competition' designation but a single awardee, what are the potential risks to price discovery and overall value for money?
While designated as 'full and open competition,' a single awardee can sometimes indicate that only one bidder met the stringent requirements, or that the market for such specialized services is limited. This can potentially reduce competitive pressure, leading to a price that might be higher than if multiple strong contenders were present. However, if the solicitation was well-defined and the single bidder was highly qualified, the price could still represent good value. Further analysis of the bid process and technical evaluations would be necessary.
What is the expected effectiveness of these 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' in achieving their intended conservation or development goals?
The effectiveness of the facilities hinges entirely on their specific design, construction quality, and intended purpose, which are not detailed in the provided data. If the project successfully delivers well-built infrastructure aligned with clear conservation or development objectives, it could be highly effective. However, without knowing the precise goals or the agency's post-construction utilization plans, assessing effectiveness remains speculative. The long-term operational success and environmental impact are key indicators.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)
Address: 215 CENTURY 21 DR, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32216
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-05-19
Current End Date: 2009-12-30
Potential End Date: 2009-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-28
More Contracts from Harry Pepper & Associates Inc
- Pump Station — $84.7M (Department of Defense)
- Picayune Merrit Pump Station — $65.4M (Department of Defense)
- HHD Structure Replacements, S-271 (C10-A), Reconstruction Palm — $51.9M (Department of Defense)
- HHD Culverts 11&16 — $46.5M (Department of Defense)
- Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation, Structure Replacements, S-274 (C-12A) and S-278 (C-2) Reconstruction, Palm Beach and Hendry County, Florida — $45.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)