Army awards $130.7M contract for Fort Lewis building construction to M. A. Mortenson Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,895,617 ($16.9M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-06-28
End Date: 2009-08-07
Contract Duration: 1,136 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200608!601601!2100!W912DW!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT SEATTLE !W912DW06C0016 !A!N! !N! ! !20060628!20080102!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIERCE !WASHINGTON!+000016648000!N!N!000016648000!Y119!OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE & SERVICE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!B! !D!N!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: TACOMA, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98433
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.9 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: 200608!601601!2100!W912DW!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT SEATTLE !W912DW06C0016 !A!N! !N! ! !20060628!20080102!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIER… Key points: 1. The contract value of $130.7 million is significant for construction projects. 2. M. A. Mortenson Company, a large firm, secured this award. 3. The project falls under the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code. 4. The risk associated with construction projects can be high due to potential delays and cost overruns.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $130.7 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar federal building contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value.
Public Impact
Local economy in Washington state may see a boost from construction jobs. Military personnel at Fort Lewis will benefit from improved facilities. The construction sector experiences increased activity and potential for follow-on work.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for construction delays impacting project completion.
- Cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations.
- Ensuring compliance with environmental and safety regulations during construction.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating competitive pricing.
- Experienced contractor with a history of large-scale projects.
- Project supports critical military infrastructure at Fort Lewis.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically for administrative and service buildings. Federal spending in this area is often tied to military base modernization and infrastructure improvements.
Small Business Impact
While the primary award went to a large firm, opportunities for small businesses may exist through subcontracting on this project. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the U.S. Army Engineer District Seattle, indicating established oversight mechanisms. Monitoring progress and adherence to contract terms will be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep leading to cost increases.
- Dependency on a single large contractor for project completion.
- Risk of unforeseen environmental or geological issues at the construction site.
- Ensuring timely delivery of materials and labor in a competitive market.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, wa, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.9 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. 200608!601601!2100!W912DW!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT SEATTLE !W912DW06C0016 !A!N! !N! ! !20060628!20080102!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIERCE !WASHINGTON!+000016648000!N!N!000016648000!Y119!OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE & SERVICE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-06-28. End: 2009-08-07.
What specific administrative and service building functions will this contract address at Fort Lewis?
The contract specifies 'OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE & SERVICE BUILDINGS' without detailing specific functions. This could encompass a range of facilities such as barracks, administrative offices, training centers, or support structures essential for base operations. A more detailed scope of work would clarify the exact purpose and impact on personnel.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract to ensure successful delivery?
Key performance indicators for this construction contract would likely include adherence to the project schedule, staying within the awarded budget, meeting quality standards for materials and workmanship, and ensuring compliance with all safety and environmental regulations. Regular progress reports and site inspections would be used to monitor these KPIs.
How does the fixed-price contract type mitigate risks for the government and the contractor?
A fixed-price contract type shifts the risk of cost overruns primarily to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage costs efficiently. For the government, it provides cost certainty, assuming the scope of work is well-defined. However, if the scope changes significantly, change orders could increase the total cost.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc. (UEI: 130731797)
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55422
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-06-28
Current End Date: 2009-08-07
Potential End Date: 2009-08-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-08-01
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Clin 0001 Base BID Repair EHW 1 Phase 2 NSB Kings BAY GA — $154.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)