DoD Awards $154.5M for Kings Bay Repair Phase 2, Awarded to M. A. Mortenson Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $154,554,192 ($154.6M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-09-26
End Date: 2024-09-16
Contract Duration: 2,182 days
Daily Burn Rate: $70.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CLIN 0001 BASE BID REPAIR EHW 1 PHASE 2 NSB KINGS BAY GA
Place of Performance
Location: KINGS BAY, CAMDEN County, GEORGIA, 31547
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $154.6 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CLIN 0001 BASE BID REPAIR EHW 1 PHASE 2 NSB KINGS BAY GA Key points: 1. The contract is for repair work at NSB Kings Bay, GA. 2. M. A. Mortenson Company, the sole awardee, has a significant contract value. 3. The contract duration is substantial at 2182 days. 4. This falls under heavy and civil engineering construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $154.5M for a 2182-day duration suggests a significant project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale civil engineering projects would be necessary to fully assess value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The significant contract value means taxpayer funds are being allocated for critical infrastructure repair, with the expectation of competitive pricing driving efficiency.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay. Supports critical infrastructure maintenance and repair services. Provides employment opportunities within the construction sector in Georgia.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may present risks for cost escalation.
- Sole awardee for a large contract warrants scrutiny of competition effectiveness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Addresses critical infrastructure needs for national defense.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which involves large-scale infrastructure projects. Spending benchmarks in this sector are highly project-specific, but the value indicates a major undertaking.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this prime contract, as it was awarded to M. A. Mortenson Company. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are participating as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is a definitive contract awarded by the Department of the Navy. Oversight will be crucial to ensure adherence to the firm fixed price, manage the long duration, and verify project completion according to specifications.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration presents potential for cost escalation.
- Sole awardee for a large contract warrants scrutiny of competition effectiveness.
- Lack of small business prime awardee.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, ga, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $154.6 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. IGF::OT::IGF CLIN 0001 BASE BID REPAIR EHW 1 PHASE 2 NSB KINGS BAY GA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $154.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-09-26. End: 2024-09-16.
What is the breakdown of the $154.5M contract value across the 2182-day period, and how does it compare to industry standards for similar repair and construction projects?
A detailed breakdown of the contract value is not provided in the data. However, the total value of $154.5M over approximately six years suggests an average annual expenditure of roughly $25.75M. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar large-scale civil engineering and repair projects within the Department of Defense and the broader construction industry to assess its reasonableness and value for taxpayer money.
Given the long duration of the contract (2182 days), what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks associated with potential cost overruns, material price fluctuations, and labor availability?
As a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, the primary responsibility for managing cost overruns and price fluctuations typically lies with the contractor, M. A. Mortenson Company. However, the long duration necessitates robust government oversight to monitor performance, ensure efficient resource utilization, and potentially incorporate contract clauses for unforeseen circumstances or significant market shifts, though FFP aims to limit such adjustments.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure competitive pricing and identify the best value solution for this critical repair project at NSB Kings Bay?
The 'full and open competition' method is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby fostering a competitive environment that should lead to better pricing and innovative solutions. To assess effectiveness, one would need to examine the number of bids received, the range of proposed prices, and the evaluation criteria used by the Department of the Navy to determine if the selected contractor, M. A. Mortenson Company, truly represented the best value considering both cost and technical merit.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6945018R0905
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc.
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55422
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $154,554,192
Exercised Options: $154,554,192
Current Obligation: $154,554,192
Actual Outlays: $3,224,995
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 27
Total Subaward Amount: $92,358,785
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-09-26
Current End Date: 2024-09-16
Potential End Date: 2024-09-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-14
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
- Option Period Four — $128.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)