J Kokolakis Contracting Awarded $63.7M for West Point Barracks Construction, Completing Project in 2022

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $63,722,017 ($63.7M)

Contractor: J Kokolakis Contracting Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-09-19

End Date: 2022-11-11

Contract Duration: 1,514 days

Daily Burn Rate: $42.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF GRANT BARRACKS, WEST POINT

Place of Performance

Location: WEST POINT, ORANGE County, NEW YORK, 10996

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $63.7 million to J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF GRANT BARRACKS, WEST POINT Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in military infrastructure at West Point. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a clear scope and budget, potentially limiting cost overruns. 3. The duration of 1514 days indicates a complex, long-term construction project. 4. The award was made under full and open competition, implying a competitive bidding process. 5. The project's completion in late 2022 suggests the construction phase is now concluded. 6. The contract value of $63.7 million places it as a substantial federal construction award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $63.7 million for barracks construction at West Point appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. While direct comparisons are difficult without specific project details, large-scale institutional construction projects of this nature often fall within this range. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, and the award was made through a competitive process, which typically drives better pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this significant construction project. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, two bids indicate that the market was responsive and that the government received at least one competitive offer.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition, even with two bidders, generally ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by preventing inflated pricing that might occur with sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Cadets and personnel at West Point will benefit from improved living and working quarters. The project delivers essential infrastructure upgrades to a premier military academy. The construction work likely had a localized economic impact in New York through job creation and material sourcing. The successful completion of the barracks project supports the operational readiness and training capabilities of the U.S. Military Academy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for construction delays impacting project timelines and costs, though mitigated by fixed-price contract.
Ensuring quality of construction meets military standards for barracks facilities.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and transparent procurement process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage budget certainty.
Project completion suggests successful execution of construction services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically focusing on institutional and commercial building construction. The federal government is a major client for construction services, particularly for infrastructure projects at military bases, federal buildings, and public facilities. The market for such large-scale projects is competitive, with established firms capable of undertaking complex builds. Benchmarks for similar barracks or dormitory construction projects would typically consider factors like square footage, location, and specific amenities required.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was competed broadly, and larger firms likely submitted bids. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data, but it is common practice for large prime contractors to engage small businesses for specialized construction trades or material supply.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight mechanisms. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Oversight would typically involve contract administration by the Army, ensuring adherence to specifications, timelines, and quality standards. The Inspector General's office could investigate any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction, Army
Barracks and Dormitory Construction
Federal Building Construction
Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

Long contract duration increases risk exposure.
Moderate competition level (2 bidders) warrants monitoring for price efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $63.7 million to J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC. IGF::OT::IGF GRANT BARRACKS, WEST POINT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $63.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-09-19. End: 2022-11-11.

What was the specific scope of work for the IGF::OT::IGF GRANT BARRACKS project at West Point?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'IGF::OT::IGF GRANT BARRACKS, WEST POINT' and falls under 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.' While the exact scope isn't detailed, it implies the construction or renovation of barracks facilities to house military personnel at the U.S. Military Academy. This would typically involve site preparation, foundation work, structural construction, installation of utilities (electrical, plumbing, HVAC), interior finishing, and potentially landscaping and exterior improvements to ensure modern, safe, and functional living quarters for cadets and staff.

How does the $63.7 million award compare to other federal barracks construction projects?

Comparing the $63.7 million award requires context regarding the scale and specific requirements of the project. Large-scale barracks construction at major military installations can range significantly. For instance, projects involving new construction of multiple buildings, extensive site work, or high-tech integration could easily exceed this amount. Conversely, smaller renovation projects or those in lower-cost-of-labor areas might be less. Given West Point's status as a premier institution and the project's duration (1514 days), $63.7 million appears to be within a reasonable range for a substantial barracks construction or renovation effort, especially considering the firm-fixed-price nature which often includes contingencies.

What are the potential risks associated with a 1514-day construction contract?

A contract duration of 1514 days (approximately 4 years) presents several inherent risks. These include potential cost escalation due to inflation in labor and material prices over the extended period, although the firm-fixed-price contract aims to mitigate this. There's also a risk of unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, historical artifacts) that could lead to delays and change orders. Furthermore, the long duration increases the likelihood of design changes or evolving military requirements that may necessitate modifications. Contractor performance risk is also amplified over a longer period, as is the risk of supply chain disruptions. Effective project management, contingency planning, and robust contract administration are crucial to managing these risks.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' designation imply for taxpayer value?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' designation is a strong indicator of potential value for taxpayers. It signifies that the government actively sought bids from all qualified contractors, fostering a competitive environment. This process typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award by offering their best terms. It also increases transparency and reduces the risk of cronyism or awarding contracts at inflated prices. While only two bids were received in this instance, the principle of open competition remains a key mechanism for ensuring that federal funds are spent efficiently and that the government obtains goods and services at market-driven prices.

What is the significance of the 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' contract type for this project?

The 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' (FFP) contract type is significant because it places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor, J Kokolakis Contracting Inc. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. This provides the government, and by extension the taxpayers, with a high degree of cost certainty. While it may lead to slightly higher initial bid prices to account for contractor risk, it significantly reduces the potential for unexpected cost increases during the project's long duration. This contract type is generally preferred for projects with well-defined scopes, like construction, where risks can be reasonably assessed.

How has spending on construction at West Point evolved over time?

Historical spending data on construction specifically at West Point is not directly available from the provided snippet. However, federal spending on military construction, including at academies like West Point, generally fluctuates based on military readiness needs, infrastructure modernization initiatives, and congressional appropriations. Major projects like barracks upgrades are often planned years in advance and funded through specific military construction budgets. Trends in federal construction spending are influenced by economic conditions, defense priorities, and the overall federal budget. This $63.7 million award represents a significant single investment in West Point's infrastructure during the period it was active.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912DS18B0003

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1500 OCEAN AVE STE A, BOHEMIA, NY, 11716

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $65,084,017

Exercised Options: $63,722,017

Current Obligation: $63,722,017

Actual Outlays: $2,415,212

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline