Army Corps of Engineers contract for educational buildings awarded to J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC for over $61M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $61,195,921 ($61.2M)

Contractor: J Kokolakis Contracting Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-05-20

End Date: 2008-08-15

Contract Duration: 1,183 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200508!500231!2100!W912DS!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT NEW YORK !W912DS05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050520!20071214!009704180!009704180!009704180!N!J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC !585 ROUTE 25A !ROCKY POINT !NY!11778!99071!071!36!ORANGE !ORANGE !NEW YORK !+000032628193!N!N!000060569408!Y139!OTHER EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WEST POINT, ORANGE County, NEW YORK, 10996

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $61.2 million to J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC for work described as: 200508!500231!2100!W912DS!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT NEW YORK !W912DS05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050520!20071214!009704180!009704180!009704180!N!J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC !585 ROUTE 25A !ROCKY POINT !NY!11778!99071!071!36!ORANGE !ORAN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1183 days suggests a significant, long-term project. 3. The award to a single contractor, J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC, warrants scrutiny for potential performance risks. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, specifically the USA Engineer District New York. 6. The contract type is a Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $61,195,920.50 for construction of educational buildings appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar projects for the Army Corps of Engineers would be necessary to determine value for money. The firm fixed price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if managed effectively. However, without specific details on the scope of work and comparable project costs, a definitive assessment of value is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates there were 5 bids received. A competitive environment with multiple bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The fact that five bids were submitted suggests a healthy level of interest in this contract opportunity.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more competitive price than a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely students and staff of educational institutions that will utilize the constructed or renovated buildings. The services delivered involve the construction or renovation of commercial and institutional buildings, specifically categorized under 'OTHER EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS'. The geographic impact is centered in New York, as indicated by the contracting office (USA ENGINEER DISTRICT NEW YORK) and the contractor's location. The contract supports the construction workforce, including laborers, tradespeople, and project managers employed by J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed price does not adequately account for unforeseen construction challenges.
Performance risk associated with the contractor's ability to deliver the project on time and to specifications.
Dependence on a single contractor for a large-scale project could lead to delays if the contractor faces financial or operational issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The project addresses the need for educational facilities, contributing to public infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220), is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape. This contract falls within the broader category of construction services procured by the Department of Defense. Federal spending in this sector often supports infrastructure development and maintenance for military bases and related facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale construction contracts awarded by agencies like the Army Corps of Engineers for similar types of facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the USA Engineer District New York, part of the Army Corps of Engineers. Accountability measures would include contract milestones, performance reviews, and adherence to the firm fixed price agreement. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
Department of Defense Facilities Construction
Educational Building Construction Projects
Firm Fixed Price Construction Awards
Federal Construction Contracts in New York

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to fixed-price nature.
Contractor performance risk on a large, long-duration project.
Limited small business participation indicated.
Need for detailed benchmarking against similar projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $61.2 million to J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC. 200508!500231!2100!W912DS!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT NEW YORK !W912DS05C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20050520!20071214!009704180!009704180!009704180!N!J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC !585 ROUTE 25A !ROCKY POINT !NY!11778!99071!071!36!ORANGE !ORANGE !NEW YORK !+000032628193!N!N!000060569408!Y139!OTHER EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $61.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-20. End: 2008-08-15.

What is the track record of J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?

Analyzing the federal contract history of J KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC reveals multiple awards, primarily within the Department of Defense and specifically with the Army Corps of Engineers. This particular contract (W912DS05C0011) for educational buildings represents a significant award amount. Further investigation into past performance reviews, any contract modifications, and the types of projects undertaken would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record. Examining data on contract closeouts and any disputes or terminations would also be crucial for a complete assessment of their reliability as a federal contractor.

How does the awarded amount of $61.2 million compare to similar educational building construction contracts by the Army Corps of Engineers?

To benchmark the $61.2 million award, a comparative analysis of similar educational building construction contracts by the Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. This would involve identifying contracts with comparable scope, size, and complexity, ideally within the same geographic region or time frame. Factors such as square footage, specific educational facility type (e.g., K-12, higher education, vocational), and the extent of renovations versus new construction would need to be considered. Without this comparative data, it is difficult to definitively state whether the awarded amount represents excellent, fair, or questionable value for money. However, the duration of over three years suggests a substantial project.

What are the primary risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract of this magnitude and duration?

The primary risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract of this magnitude ($61.2 million) and duration (1183 days) revolve around potential cost overruns for the contractor and the government's ability to ensure quality and scope adherence. For the contractor, unforeseen site conditions, material price escalations, or labor shortages could lead to significant financial losses if not adequately accounted for in the initial bid. For the government, the risk lies in ensuring the contractor delivers the project according to specifications and quality standards within the fixed price. Scope creep, if not managed through formal change orders, can also become an issue. Robust oversight and clear contract terms are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the significance of the NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) in the context of this contract?

The NAICS code 236220 signifies that the contract is for the construction of buildings intended for commercial or institutional use, rather than residential or industrial purposes. In the context of this Army Corps of Engineers contract, it specifically points to the construction or renovation of facilities that serve an educational function, such as schools, training centers, or academic buildings. This classification helps in understanding the type of construction services required and allows for comparison with other federal contracts within the same industry segment. It also informs the selection of appropriate construction standards and regulatory compliance.

How might the 'OTHER EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS' designation impact the project's requirements and execution?

The 'OTHER EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS' designation suggests a broad scope that could encompass a variety of educational facility types beyond standard K-12 schools or universities. This might include specialized training centers, vocational schools, research facilities, or administrative buildings associated with educational institutions. The impact on project requirements and execution could involve unique architectural designs, specific technological infrastructure needs (e.g., labs, specialized classrooms), stringent safety protocols, and compliance with diverse educational standards. The contractor must be adaptable to potentially varied functional requirements within the educational sector.

What does the number of bids (5) suggest about the market for this type of construction service for the Army Corps of Engineers?

Receiving five bids for this construction contract suggests a moderately competitive market for the services required by the Army Corps of Engineers in the New York district. While five bidders indicate that multiple firms were interested and capable of undertaking the project, it is not an exceptionally high number for a contract of this size. This level of competition is generally considered healthy, likely contributing to a reasonable price discovery process. However, it also implies that the market might not be saturated with potential bidders, and the government should continue to monitor contractor performance and market dynamics to ensure sustained competition for future requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 585 ROUTE 25A, ROCKY POINT, NY, 11778

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline