DoD's $800K Environmental Remediation Contract Awarded to EA Engineering for Services in New Jersey

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $799,595 ($799.6K)

Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2031-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $438/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) DATED NOVEMBER 2025

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKAWAY, MORRIS County, NEW JERSEY, 07866

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $799,595.45 to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) DATED NOVEMBER 2025 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on environmental remediation, a critical but often costly service. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of five years (1825 days) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-fee pricing structure provides some cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 6. The specific remediation services required are detailed in a Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this specific $799,595.45 contract is challenging without knowing the scope of work and the specific environmental conditions being addressed. However, the contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) allows for cost reimbursement with a fixed fee, which can be efficient for services where exact costs are difficult to predict upfront. The number of bids (4) suggests a reasonable level of interest and potential for competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple potential bidders were allowed to submit proposals. With four bids received, the competition level appears moderate. This suggests that the agency sought a broad range of qualified contractors, and the pricing should reflect market conditions to some extent.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging high-quality service delivery.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from ensuring environmental compliance and mitigating potential hazards at its facilities. Services delivered will involve environmental remediation, addressing contamination and restoring sites. The geographic impact is focused on New Jersey, where the remediation activities will take place. The contract supports a specialized workforce in environmental engineering and remediation services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Environmental remediation services are a critical component of the broader environmental services industry, which includes consulting, engineering, waste management, and site cleanup. This sector is driven by regulatory compliance, corporate responsibility, and government mandates. The market size for environmental remediation is substantial, with significant spending from both public and private sectors. This contract fits within the government's ongoing efforts to manage and remediate contaminated sites, particularly those associated with military operations.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. However, large prime contractors like EA Engineering often engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services or to meet broader subcontracting goals. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether EA Engineering actively seeks out and utilizes small business partners for this specific project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Army. The Performance Work Statement (PWS) will define the specific deliverables and performance standards, against which the contractor's work will be measured. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, new-jersey, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, remediation-services, long-term-contract, environmental-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $799,595.45 to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) DATED NOVEMBER 2025

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $799,595.45.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2031-03-31.

What is the typical cost structure for environmental remediation services of this nature, and how does a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) arrangement compare?

Environmental remediation projects often involve significant uncertainties regarding the extent of contamination, necessary cleanup methods, and unforeseen site conditions. This complexity makes fixed-price contracts challenging. Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are common in such scenarios. Under CPFF, the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs incurred and pays a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This structure provides cost control for the government by capping the profit margin, while allowing flexibility to address unknown variables. Compared to other structures like Firm Fixed Price (FFP), CPFF offers more protection against cost overruns due to unforeseen issues, but requires robust government oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and the fixed fee remains appropriate for the effort.

How does the number of bids (4) influence the potential value for money in this contract?

Receiving four bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this environmental remediation contract. While more bids generally lead to better price discovery and potentially lower prices, four bidders can still provide sufficient competition to drive value. It indicates that the opportunity was attractive enough for several qualified firms to invest resources in preparing proposals. The government's ability to secure good value will depend on the thoroughness of the evaluation process, the clarity of the Performance Work Statement (PWS), and the specific technical and cost proposals submitted by each bidder. A competitive range of proposals allows the contracting officer to negotiate effectively.

What are the potential risks associated with a five-year contract duration for environmental remediation?

A five-year duration for environmental remediation presents several potential risks. Firstly, environmental regulations and best practices can evolve over this period, potentially requiring scope adjustments or additional work not initially anticipated. Secondly, unforeseen site conditions or the discovery of new contaminants could significantly increase costs and extend timelines beyond initial estimates, even with a CPFF structure. Thirdly, contractor performance can degrade over long periods, necessitating diligent oversight. Finally, market conditions for specialized remediation services or materials might change, impacting the long-term cost-effectiveness if not adequately managed through contract clauses or future negotiations.

What is EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC's track record with federal environmental remediation contracts?

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC has a significant history of performing environmental services for federal agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their portfolio typically includes site investigation, remediation design, construction, and long-term monitoring. Publicly available contract data often shows them as a frequent awardee for various environmental projects across different military branches and civilian agencies. Their experience suggests a familiarity with federal contracting processes, regulatory requirements (like CERCLA and RCRA), and the complexities of large-scale environmental cleanup projects. Assessing their specific performance on past contracts, including timeliness, budget adherence, and quality of work, would require a deeper dive into contract performance reports and agency evaluations.

How does this contract's value compare to other federal environmental remediation spending?

The $799,595.45 value of this specific delivery order is relatively modest within the broader context of federal environmental remediation spending. The Department of Defense alone spends billions annually on environmental restoration, cleanup, and compliance activities across its global installations. Many individual cleanup projects, especially those involving large Superfund sites or extensive contamination, can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over their lifecycles. This contract likely represents a specific task order under a larger IDIQ contract, focusing on a defined scope of work at a particular location in New Jersey. Its value is typical for localized or specific remediation tasks rather than comprehensive site-wide cleanups.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 SCHILLING CIR STE 400, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,461,113

Exercised Options: $2,461,113

Current Obligation: $799,595

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DQ22D3025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-01

Current End Date: 2031-03-31

Potential End Date: 2031-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-14

More Contracts from EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

View all EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending