Army awards $13M contract for architectural and engineering services to M. A. Mortenson Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,111,333 ($16.1M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-04-19
End Date: 2009-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,260 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200608!600774!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ06C0019 !A!N! !N! ! !20060419!20051207!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!23975!061!20!FORT RILEY !GEARY !KANSAS !+000000330000!N!N!000000000000!C219!OTHER ARCHITECT & ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !921190!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FORT RILEY, GEARY County, KANSAS, 66442
State: Kansas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.1 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: 200608!600774!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ06C0019 !A!N! !N! ! !20060419!20051207!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!23975!061!20!FORT RILEY !GEAR… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The total value of the contract is $13,073,179.70. 3. The contract is for architectural and engineering services, a common need for military construction and infrastructure projects. 4. The awarding agency is the Department of the Army, specifically the US Engineer District Kansas City.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $13.07 million for architectural and engineering services appears reasonable for a definitive contract of this duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
This contract supports infrastructure development and maintenance at Fort Riley, Kansas. Architectural and engineering services are crucial for planning and executing military construction projects. The duration of the contract (over 3 years) indicates a significant project requiring sustained professional services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the scope of services.
- No information on small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Clear awarding agency and location.
Sector Analysis
Architectural and engineering services are essential for government infrastructure projects. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on agency needs and overall construction activity.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication of small business participation in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the scope was not suitable for small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District, which has established oversight mechanisms for such procurements. However, specific oversight details for this contract are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Other General Government Support
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed scope of work.
- No information on small business subcontracting.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Limited insight into the specific engineering challenges addressed.
Tags
other-general-government-support, department-of-defense, ks, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.1 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. 200608!600774!2100!W912DQ!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT KANSAS CTY!W912DQ06C0019 !A!N! !N! ! !20060419!20051207!008904385!008904385!130731797!N!M A MORTENSON COMPANY !700 MEADOW LN N !MINNEAPOLIS !MN!55422!23975!061!20!FORT RILEY !GEARY !KANSAS !+000000330000!N!N!000000000000!C219!OTHER ARCHITECT & ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !921190!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-04-19. End: 2009-09-30.
What specific architectural and engineering tasks were included in this contract?
The provided data classifies the service under NAICS code 921190 (Other General Government Support) and PSC code C219 (ARCHITECT & ENGINEERING SERVICES). However, the specific tasks, deliverables, and project scope are not detailed in this record. Further documentation would be required to understand the precise nature of the services procured.
What was the competitive landscape for this contract, and did it result in significant cost savings?
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' indicating multiple bids were likely received. While this suggests a competitive process, the data does not quantify the cost savings achieved compared to a baseline or sole-source scenario. The final award price of $13.07 million reflects the outcome of this competition.
What is the long-term impact of these architectural and engineering services on the Fort Riley infrastructure?
The contract duration of over three years suggests a substantial project. These services are critical for ensuring that infrastructure at Fort Riley is well-planned, designed, and executed, contributing to the base's operational readiness and modernization. The specific long-term impact depends on the nature of the projects undertaken.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Public Administration › Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support › Other General Government Support
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc.
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55422
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-04-19
Current End Date: 2009-09-30
Potential End Date: 2009-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-09-29
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Clin 0001 Base BID Repair EHW 1 Phase 2 NSB Kings BAY GA — $154.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)