DoD awards $11.15M contract for planning, procurement, and construction services to PCL Construction Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,150,087 ($11.2M)
Contractor: PCL Construction Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-28
End Date: 2010-05-30
Contract Duration: 1,340 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CT-M, CONTRACT[119214]PLNG PR&C ADAL
Place of Performance
Location: AURORA, ARAPAHOE County, COLORADO, 80011
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.2 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. for work described as: CT-M, CONTRACT[119214]PLNG PR&C ADAL Key points: 1. Contract awarded to PCL Construction Services, Inc. for $11.15 million. 2. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a defense-related need. 4. The contract duration is 1340 days, suggesting a significant project.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.15 million for planning, procurement, and construction services appears within a reasonable range for large-scale institutional projects. Benchmarking against similar Department of the Army construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple qualified bidders can participate.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring the government receives the best value through competitive bidding.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding processes for large construction projects. The Department of the Army's investment in construction services supports military infrastructure. PCL Construction Services, Inc. plays a role in executing government construction projects.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific project details makes it difficult to assess value for money.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-duration construction projects.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a significant duration.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contract awarded to a known entity in the construction sector.
- Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) limits cost uncertainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which is a significant area of government spending, particularly for infrastructure development and facility maintenance. Benchmarks for similar projects vary widely based on scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, though the prime contractor may subcontract portions of the work.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve contract management by the Department of the Army to ensure PCL Construction Services, Inc. adheres to the terms, timelines, and quality standards of the firm-fixed-price contract. Regular progress reports and site inspections are standard accountability measures.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (1340 days) increases exposure to market fluctuations.
- Lack of specific project scope makes value assessment difficult.
- No indication of small business participation.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions in construction projects.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, co, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.2 million to PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.. CT-M, CONTRACT[119214]PLNG PR&C ADAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2010-05-30.
What specific planning, procurement, and construction activities are encompassed by this $11.15 million contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's strategic objectives?
The contract details are limited, but 'planning, procurement, and construction' suggests a comprehensive approach to facility development or renovation. This could include architectural design, material acquisition, and the physical building process. Alignment with strategic objectives would depend on the specific military installation or mission requirements the project serves, such as troop housing, training facilities, or operational support structures.
Given the 1340-day duration, what are the primary risks associated with cost escalation or scope creep for this firm-fixed-price contract?
While a firm-fixed-price contract aims to mitigate cost escalation, risks can still arise from unforeseen site conditions, material price volatility, or changes in regulatory requirements. Scope creep is a risk if the contract's definition of 'planning, procurement, and construction' is not precisely delineated, allowing for additions or modifications that increase costs beyond the initial agreement. Robust change order management is crucial.
How effectively does the 'full and open competition' award method ensure optimal value and quality for the Department of the Army in this specific construction contract?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. For construction, this method should theoretically lead to a high-quality outcome at a competitive price. The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the responsiveness of bidders, and the government's evaluation process to select the most advantageous offer, not just the lowest price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9128F06R0006
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: PCL U.S. Holdings Inc (UEI: 245222591)
Address: 2000 S COLORADO BLVD STE 2-500, DENVER, CO, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,150,087
Exercised Options: $11,150,087
Current Obligation: $11,150,087
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-28
Current End Date: 2010-05-30
Potential End Date: 2010-05-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-04-09
More Contracts from PCL Construction Services, Inc.
- CMC Services for the Utilities Infrastructure Project AT the Denver Federal Center — $66.3M (General Services Administration)
- Pre-Construction Services — $38.5M (Department of Defense)
- Gs06p02gzc0518 - PCL Construction Cape Girardeau,U.S. Courthouse — $38.1M (General Services Administration)
- M -(334785) B-52 Two-Bay Phase Maintenance Dock, Minot AFB, ND. Construct Project # Qjvf092012 — $33.9M (Department of Defense)
- Construct a NEW 120-BED Nursing Home — $33.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
View all PCL Construction Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)