Fort Sill Logistics Contract Awarded to Field Support Services for $194M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $102,493,015 ($102.5M)
Contractor: World Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-07-29
End Date: 2014-01-16
Contract Duration: 3,458 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200411!000589!2100!W9124L!ACA, FORT SILL !W9124L04C0005 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040729!20040930!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!27300!031!40!FORT SILL !COMANCHE !OKLAHOMA !+000000201488!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!B!U!R!1!001!N!5A!C!Y!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!E! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !Y! !W804A6!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FORT SILL, COMANCHE County, OKLAHOMA, 73503
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $102.5 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200411!000589!2100!W9124L!ACA, FORT SILL !W9124L04C0005 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040729!20040930!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!27300!031!40!FORT SILL !COMA… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for logistics support services at Fort Sill. 2. Significant value of $194 million over its life. 3. Awarded to Field Support Services, Inc. 4. Sector is Facilities Support Services, a broad category.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value is $194,163,481. Without more detailed cost breakdowns or benchmarks for similar logistics support services at military installations, it's difficult to definitively assess if this represents excellent value. The pricing structure (Cost Plus Award Fee) can sometimes lead to higher costs if not tightly managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not competed, indicated by 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers. The specific reasons for this limitation are not detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of full and open competition for a contract of this magnitude raises concerns about potential overspending and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Military base operations depend on reliable logistics support. Taxpayer funds are allocated for essential base services. Contract duration impacts long-term planning for base support. Potential for cost overruns due to contract type and limited competition.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Lack of detailed justification for limited competition
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a specific company
- Services provided to a military installation
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, which is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the type and scale of the facility.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The limited competition and cost-plus award fee structure warrant close oversight to ensure cost control and effective service delivery. Accountability for performance and spending should be rigorously maintained by the contracting agency.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of full and open competition
- Cost Plus Award Fee contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency on justification for sole-source/limited competition
- No clear indication of small business participation
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, ok, dca, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $102.5 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. 200411!000589!2100!W9124L!ACA, FORT SILL !W9124L04C0005 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040729!20040930!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!27300!031!40!FORT SILL !COMANCHE !OKLAHOMA !+000000201488!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $102.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-07-29. End: 2014-01-16.
What specific factors justified limiting competition for this significant logistics support contract?
The provided data does not specify the justification for limiting competition. Typically, such limitations are based on factors like urgent and compelling needs, unique capabilities of a single source, or specific government requirements that only one contractor can meet. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the validity of the limitation.
How effectively was the Cost Plus Award Fee structure managed to control costs and incentivize performance?
The effectiveness of the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure hinges on the clarity of performance metrics and the rigor of oversight. While CPAF can incentivize desired outcomes, it also carries a risk of cost escalation if award criteria are too lenient or if contractor costs are not closely scrutinized. Detailed performance reviews and audit reports would be necessary to assess this.
What is the long-term impact of this contract on the operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness of Fort Sill's logistics?
The long-term impact depends on the quality of services delivered and the overall cost compared to alternative arrangements. If Field Support Services, Inc. provides high-quality, reliable logistics support at a reasonable cost, it contributes positively. However, the limited competition and CPAF structure raise questions about whether optimal value was achieved, potentially impacting long-term cost-effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (UEI: 076637073)
Address: 3900 C ST STE 301, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Other Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $64,190,865
Exercised Options: $18,091,936
Current Obligation: $102,493,015
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-07-29
Current End Date: 2014-01-16
Potential End Date: 2014-01-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-04-03
More Contracts from World Technical Services, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $88.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!009690!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv06c0406 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060928!20140930!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C ST STE 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!03000!020!02!anchorage !anchorage !alaska !+000001564583!n!n!000000000000!az11!rdte/Other Research&development-Basic Research !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !NOT Discernable !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!001!k! !A!Y!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $74.5M (Department of Defense)
- Support Services — $57.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Headquarters Library, Operations Services, Mail Center Operations Services, Janitorial Services, Helpdesk Services, and Archival Service — $19.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200406!000285!5700!QA29 !6 Cons/Lgc !FA481404C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20040213!20050331!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C Street, Suite 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!02762!055!12!avon Park AF Range !highlands !florida !+000002049857!n!n!000002049857!r499!other Professional Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!j!1!001!n!5a!z!n!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $14.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)