DHS awarded $57.2M for facilities support services to World Technical Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $57,199,620 ($57.2M)
Contractor: World Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2004-10-01
End Date: 2009-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,611 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: NORTH CHARLESTON, CHARLESTON County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29405
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $57.2 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in essential operational support. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open approach, potentially driving competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration of over 4 years suggests a need for sustained service delivery. 4. Performance context is tied to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's operational needs. 5. Sector positioning is within facilities support services, a critical component of government operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $57.2 million over approximately 4.3 years averages to about $13.3 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for federal agencies requires detailed market analysis, but the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. Without specific per-unit data, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award mechanism is a positive indicator.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This specific designation suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded for defined reasons, possibly related to specific capabilities or prior performance. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'limited' competition level implies fewer than a truly unrestricted full and open competition, which could impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process, even if limited, as it generally leads to better pricing than a sole-source award. However, the exclusion of certain sources warrants scrutiny to ensure no potential cost savings were foregone.
Public Impact
Federal law enforcement personnel benefit from well-maintained training facilities. Services delivered include essential facility operations and maintenance. Geographic impact is concentrated around the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in South Carolina. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for personnel involved in facilities management and support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition to reduce price discovery.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes assessing effectiveness difficult.
- Firm-fixed-price contracts can shift risk to the contractor, but may also include contingency costs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, indicating some level of market engagement.
- Long-term contract duration suggests a stable and predictable service requirement.
- Focus on facilities support is critical for agency operational continuity.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government buildings and infrastructure. This sector is characterized by a mix of large, established providers and smaller specialized firms. The market size is substantial, with significant annual federal spending allocated to these services across various agencies. This contract fits within the broader trend of federal agencies outsourcing non-core functions to specialized contractors to ensure efficient operations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to World Technical Services, Inc., it is unlikely that significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were mandated unless specified within the contract terms, which are not detailed here. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests the primary focus was on securing specialized capabilities from larger, established firms.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Buildings and Facilities Maintenance
- Government Operations Support Services
- Law Enforcement Training Infrastructure
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may impact price discovery.
- Contract performance history not detailed.
- Specific value-for-money metrics not provided.
Tags
facilities-support, department-of-homeland-security, federal-law-enforcement-training-center, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, limited-competition, south-carolina, support-services, world-technical-services-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $57.2 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $57.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-10-01. End: 2009-02-28.
What is the track record of World Technical Services, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?
World Technical Services, Inc. (WTS) has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to facilities support and logistics. A review of federal procurement data would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance. Key indicators to examine include contract values, agencies served, performance ratings (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar scope and scale contracts is crucial for assessing their capability to meet the requirements of this DHS award. Their past performance provides a baseline for evaluating their reliability and effectiveness in delivering the contracted services.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?
A comprehensive comparison of the awarded price to market rates for similar facilities support services would require detailed analysis of the contract's scope of work and the specific services provided. Benchmarking would involve identifying comparable contracts awarded by other federal agencies or state/local governments for similar facilities, considering factors like square footage, types of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping), and geographic location. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract suggests a defined cost ceiling. Without granular data on labor rates, material costs, and overhead specific to this contract, a precise value-for-money assessment relative to the market is difficult, but the competitive award mechanism is a positive sign.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities support contract?
Primary risks associated with this facilities support contract include potential cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price structure does not adequately account for unforeseen operational challenges or price escalations, although the FFP structure aims to mitigate this by placing risk on the contractor. Performance risk exists if the contractor fails to deliver services to the required standards, potentially impacting the operations of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. There's also a risk related to the 'limited' competition, which could mean that alternative, potentially more cost-effective solutions or providers were not fully explored. Contractor personnel reliability and security clearances are also critical risk factors in a federal law enforcement training environment.
How effective has World Technical Services, Inc. been in fulfilling past facilities support contracts?
Assessing the effectiveness of World Technical Services, Inc. in fulfilling past facilities support contracts requires access to performance evaluations and historical data that are not directly provided in the summary data. Typically, federal agencies maintain performance records (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) that rate contractors on factors such as technical performance, cost control, schedule adherence, and management. A thorough review of these records would indicate WTS's historical success rate, identify any recurring issues, and provide insights into their ability to consistently meet or exceed contract requirements. Without this specific performance data, effectiveness is inferred from the contract award itself and the competitive nature of the procurement.
What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center?
Historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) would provide crucial context for evaluating the $57.2 million award. Analyzing past contracts for similar services at FLETC would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and awarded contractors. This analysis could identify periods of increased or decreased spending, potential cost efficiencies achieved over time, or shifts in service providers. Understanding this historical context helps determine if the current contract represents a significant increase or decrease in spending, and whether it aligns with long-term facility management strategies and budget allocations for FLETC operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (UEI: 076637073)
Address: 3900 C STREET, SUITE 803, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $57,199,620
Exercised Options: $57,199,620
Current Obligation: $57,199,620
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-10-01
Current End Date: 2009-02-28
Potential End Date: 2009-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-06-12
More Contracts from World Technical Services, Inc.
- 200411!000589!2100!w9124l!aca, Fort Sill !W9124L04C0005 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040729!20040930!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C Street, Suite 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!27300!031!40!fort Sill !comanche !oklahoma !+000000201488!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!u!r!1!001!n!5a!c!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !Y! !W804A6!0001! ! — $102.5M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $88.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!009690!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv06c0406 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060928!20140930!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C ST STE 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!03000!020!02!anchorage !anchorage !alaska !+000001564583!n!n!000000000000!az11!rdte/Other Research&development-Basic Research !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !NOT Discernable !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!001!k! !A!Y!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $74.5M (Department of Defense)
- Headquarters Library, Operations Services, Mail Center Operations Services, Janitorial Services, Helpdesk Services, and Archival Service — $19.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200406!000285!5700!QA29 !6 Cons/Lgc !FA481404C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20040213!20050331!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C Street, Suite 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!02762!055!12!avon Park AF Range !highlands !florida !+000002049857!n!n!000002049857!r499!other Professional Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!j!1!001!n!5a!z!n!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $14.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)